> Anyway now that that stuff’s out of the way, here’s the penultimate and most educated answer you’ll get about whether or not Elites should become ‘Spartans’ (as a title).
>
> No.
>
> Spartans represent the best warriors of the human race. The reason Spartan IIs were named Spartan IIs, was because they were effectively the first new generation of soldiers genetically-hand picked, trained from the age of 6, and augmented to be the most powerful human soldiers in the 2500s. Just like the greatest soldiers of humanity’s past, the Spartans of Sparta, who legends say would only allow strong children to live, and would train them effectively from birth to fight. It is an entirely HUMAN term, from HUMAN mythology.
You make some good points but it could be argued that a Spartan used to be an entirely Greek term from Greek mythology yet the Spartan name was later adopted and expanded by the human culture of the 2500’s, when this happened the term evolved and changed such as how modern Spartans wear full body while the Greek ones didn’t. Now yes there’s plenty of major differences between the Sangheili adopting the term and modern Humanity adopting the term, a big one being that it took hundreds of years for humanity to give their own soldiers the name while I’m expecting the Sangheili that work with us to do it within a decade but the fact that terms like this can expand beyond race and culture makes it a possibility that the sangheili could use the term too and once they do the term would continue to change and evolve just as it has been since Halsey decided on the name all those years ago.
This evolution of the term has been naturally evolving throughout the Halo franchise. We began with the SIIs that had a lot of obvious differences from their Ancient Greek counterparts, then there’s the IIIs which had a lot of things that were different from the IIs like the more flexible age restrictions and had a mentality of quantity over quality, then with introduction of the IVs the ideology of using children is out the window along with a large number of other changes. Throwing out the idea that only Humans can be Spartans will just be continuing the evolution of the term Spartan.
But again this just goes down to how everyone’s opinion of what a spartan is is different. If you think that a Spartan is human term and that should never change then that’s fine.
> As well, just because the Arbiter is cooperating with the UNSC does NOT mean him, or his followers are a part of the UNSC’s navy, honorary or otherwise. However it DOES mean the possibility of being granted the ability to train with and accompany UNSC naval forces exists. What this means, basically, is not that an Elite would become a member of a Spartan squad, but rather that Elite forces, and vice versa Spartan forces, may be put in a situation to effectively ‘tag along’ with a Spartan Squad or Elite Squad under the premise of full cooperation for the duration of the mission. And Elites would be allowed to utilize War Games simulations alongside Spartans for training purposes.
This does make sense and it is a possibility. I can even imagine cool ways of how it could work for some really cool situations.
But it has just one flaw. Having Fire teams consisting of mixes of both SIVs and Sangheili wouldn’t exist. Which would really suck because having a team with mixed troops could lead to so many cool characters. I want mixed teams that work together just like Majestic does but the only difference is that some of the members would be Sangheili. Can you imagine just how cool that would be!
> Spartans are human soldiers that have been augmented as part of a Spartan program. Nothing more, nothing less. If the title of ‘Spartan’ was available to Elites then why not open it up to the Jackals too? And the Hunters, and the Drones, and the Grunts, and the rest of Humanity while we’re at it.
>
> Spartans in the Halo universe are products of a Spartan program.
So your of the opinion that a Spartan has to come from a Spartan program and also be a human? This is fine but I have to ask what about the Greek Spartans? They weren’t part of a Spartan program so that kinda breaks this. Along with the fact that there’s a Spartan branch and as far as we know there are only Spartans from Spartan programs in this branch but what if someone like one of those project Javelin soldiers that were supposed to be super soldiers too were to become part of the branch because they meet the necessary requirements but don’t need to go through a Spartan program to meet the requirements? Would they not be allowed to join because they didn’t go through a Spartan program? Will they have to unnecessarily go through a Spartan program to get in? And even if they were allowed to join the branch would they still not be considered true Spartans even though they are just as good as any other Spartan, fight along side their fellow Spartans and meet every mental and physical trait that a Spartan should have? Just because they didn’t go through an unnecessary program that they don’t need in order to meet the requirements. And in your opinion why is being human a requirement even if a non human solider meets all the physical and mental requirements?
And since that I am of the opinion that one’s species shouldn’t get in the way of becoming a Spartan then yes. Grunts, Jackals, Drones etc should have that opportunity as long as they meet the physical and mental requirements of becoming a Spartan and as long as they can be trusted, though I find it hard to believe that one of these species would be able to meet these requirements without major alterations to their bodies and minds. And pretty much all Humans that can be trusted have the option already. All they have to do is sign up, prove their worthiness and join the Spartans which is is something that I think that all sentient species should have.
> Spartans should remain Spartans. The Elites can have their title “Elite” simply be the equal to the title “Spartan”.
Elite is just a nick name, theirs nothing honorable about it and it’s not an equivalent to the Spartan title. But I can see what you mean, Having both SIVs and Elites be considered Spartans could be confusing.
I want to make the point that this would only be a title not what they would often be referred as. A Spartan is a title but a Spartan IV is a solider from the Spartan IV program which should be treated like two different things. So While SIVs and Elites will both be Spartans by title they’ll still be referred to as Elites and SIVs on missions so that players can still make that distinction.
One last thing that I want to say is that I’m sure all of you have counter arguments prepared by the time you finish reading this but I want you to know that what I’m saying is based on what my opinion of what a Spartan is and as I said before everyone has their own definition so I in no way expect to convince you to change your opinions and because of all these different oppinions I doubt that we’ll ever come to a mutual agreement.