This armor will look great on next gen, as long as it doesn’t get “decimator-ed”.
.
One of the few armors from the earliest customisation in halo.
One of the few classics not in halo 5.
Cqb, EOD, and rogue.
EOD and CQB, made it to reach.
EOD made it to 3 because of its storm Trooper resemblance.
Rogue didn’t because it looked like scout.
…
Cqb has been my favorite since it was teased in a halo 2 update image with a flamethrower just before halo 3 released. 10 years?
There are 4 more updates to come. There is still hope =)
> 2533274983213185;1:
> This armor will look great on next gen, as long as it doesn’t get “decimatored”.
> .
> One of the few armors from the earliest customisation in halo.
> One of the few classics not in halo 5.
> Cqb, EOD, and rogue.
>
> EOD and CQB, made it to reach.
> EOD made it to 3 because of its storm Trooper resemblance.
> Rogue didn’t because it looked like scout.
> …
> Cqb has been my favorite since it was teased in a halo 2 update image with a flamethrower just before halo 3 released. 10 years?
What do you mean by that? Decimatored?
> 2533274909139271;2:
> There are 4 more updates to come. There is still hope =)
The updates are not stopping in June.
Yeah, love the cqb helmet. The Reach version over the 3 one. Would like to see it return hopefully doesnt get too much of a redesign. Pls 343i
> 2533274813061580;4:
> > 2533274909139271;2:
> > There are 4 more updates to come. There is still hope =)
>
>
> The updates are not stopping in June.
Yay! Link?
Wearing this for soo many years other helmets just look bad.
Or maybe I just like cqb too much, and other armors just don’t fit me.
“Give me back my face!”-rorschach.
I’m all for CQB as well but didn’t you already make a thread about this two or so weeks ago?
> 2533274803493024;3:
> > 2533274983213185;1:
> > This armor will look great on next gen, as long as it doesn’t get “decimatored”.
> > .
> > One of the few armors from the earliest customisation in halo.
> > One of the few classics not in halo 5.
> > Cqb, EOD, and rogue.
> >
> > EOD and CQB, made it to reach.
> > EOD made it to 3 because of its storm Trooper resemblance.
> > Rogue didn’t because it looked like scout.
> > …
> > Cqb has been my favorite since it was teased in a halo 2 update image with a flamethrower just before halo 3 released. 10 years?
>
>
> What do you mean by that? Decimatored?
Decimator is a horrible redesign of noble 6’s armor.
Decimated: to cause great destruction or harm to.
…
But the topic is cqb
The elegant and unique t shaped visor.
How can an iconic armor not be considered?
When they keep giving us theese ugly new armors in updates.
Cqb if done well would bring back practicality over theese overly aesthetic armors.
Armor designed to improve survivability in close quarters combat.
Ugly armors, like decimator?
Cqb.
Other than the shoulders it does improve survivability in quarters.
Square, they are just grapple points.
I miss HAZOP.
That was the coolest set in Halo 4.
> 2535465266874213;12:
> I miss HAZOP.
> That was the coolest set in Halo 4.
The sad face helmet?
Aka the upside down cqb visor.
One thing I noticed 343 did compared to Bungie is that the helmets Bungie made looked like they could actually work as actual functional helmets, alot of the helmets 343 made don’t seem very practical, just for style, like the Wetwork and LOCUS hemlets, the CQB helmet would be an excellent addition as long as 343 doesn’t mess with it too much, we all saw what they did with the ODST helmet in Halo 4
> 2535428966216937;14:
> One thing I noticed 343 did compared to Bungie is that the helmets Bungie made looked like they could actually work as actual functional helmets, alot of the helmets 343 made don’t seem very practical, just for style, like the Wetwork and LOCUS hemlets, the CQB helmet would be an excellent addition as long as 343 doesn’t mess with it too much, we all saw what they did with the ODST helmet in Halo 4
Don’t forget scanner, that dvd player on your face might be ok if you were a pilot.
But not for the battlefield.
. …
There aren’t too many “practical” armor designs in 4 or 5.
> 2533274983213185;15:
> > 2535428966216937;14:
> > One thing I noticed 343 did compared to Bungie is that the helmets Bungie made looked like they could actually work as actual functional helmets, alot of the helmets 343 made don’t seem very practical, just for style, like the Wetwork and LOCUS hemlets, the CQB helmet would be an excellent addition as long as 343 doesn’t mess with it too much, we all saw what they did with the ODST helmet in Halo 4
>
>
> Don’t forget scanner, that dvd player on your face might be ok if you were a pilot.
> But not for the battlefield.
> . …
> There aren’t too many “practical” armor designs in 4 or 5.
DVD player XD. I’m glad I’m not the only one who thinks it. It kinda reminds me of the HD drive for 360, like they couldn’t get it immortalized in real life so they immortalized it in a game instead