> > Halo 2-3 was a huge drop in the fun…i got bored of halo 3 so fast because it was just like halo 2 except slower and less fun. What woudl’ve made it better is if they made it more similar to halo 2 but with better graphics…more maps…and a new campaign.
> >
> > Instead i got bored of halo 3 within months. <mark>Reach took weeks…just because it wasn’t a good game to begin with.</mark>
>
> Why play it for weeks then if it was bad from the start?
>
> Think before you type.
Right here. Anyone that was unhappy with it without the idea of adapting or attempting to get used to it, is a hypocrite for playing “For weeks”.
If anything, judging from this post alone, Halo doesn’t seem like the franchise for you. There are plenty of games out there for you to lack in skill and criticize their developers. Problem is, YOU don’t make up the target audience. Barely even a thousandth of it.
OP, do your self a favor and just shut up and drop it, all you’re doing is digging your self a little hole, you act like a noob, you are calling the people at 343i ignorant.
I like sprint, yes Halo doesn’t need sprint, but sprint is one of the few AAs that don’t break the game play, you can still kill a person sprinting, they can’t jump higher than any one else, all they’re doing is running faster. Just because it didn’t work in Reach, doesn’t mean it wont work in Halo 4.
If you really think you’re smarter than the people at 343i, then how about this, you go make your own video game.
> Halo 2-3 was a huge drop in the fun…i got bored of halo 3 so fast because it was just like halo 2 except slower and less fun.
> What would’ve made it better is if they made it more similar to halo 2 but with better graphics…more maps…and a new campaign.
What?
So you got bored of Halo 3 becasue it was to much like Halo 2. But you’re also saying it would be better if it was more similar to Halo 2. That’s being a little contradicting.
> > Don’t kid yourself when you know it’s true my friend.
>
> Got any more lacking responses that don’t help further your argument? You don’t even need us posting in here as such. You’re own argument is flawed in so many capacities.
>
>
> Again, you get no say/right to tell the industry how to do it’s job when it’s job is to Sell Games.
>
> Guess what Bungie/343 has been doing? Selling Games.
>
>
> You’ve got a plethora of search engines out there to put that proof right in your face.
>
>
>
> Please put this baby to bed.
I’m just saying… i like halo…and there’s a good chance i might not even buy halo 4. that’s why i’m complaining. I don twant them to ruin what was once a fun game. Halo will never be Halo 2 ever again…not even Halo 2 with no button combos. Even that would top Halo 3 or Reach, but no it will never happen.
> Just to get this straight. I’m all for change…good change…not…bad change.
Well, YOU don’t decide the quality. The collective community does and that results in sales and rating. Reach wasn’t lacking anywhere as near as bad as you claim it did.
You know what they do to a product that is “broken” and “Faulty”? They scrap or recall them.
In games, they stop releasing the product and shut servers down.
Hasn’t come anywhere close to happening for Reach yet.
> I’m just saying… i like halo…and there’s a good chance i might not even buy halo 4. that’s why i’m complaining. I don twant them to ruin what was once a fun game. Halo will never be Halo 2 ever again…not even Halo 2 with no button combos. Even that would top Halo 3 or Reach, but no it will never happen.
Sorry but it sucks to be you then. That goes for anyone that can’t appreciate what they’re getting.
Halo will never be Halo 2 again.
Good. Not in a negative way but Halo 2 had it’s chance, made it’s mark and now we should move on to bigger and better things.
When it comes to remakes, most old school fans overly criticize it anyway b/c it’s a fact you cannot strike lightning twice. You can come close but you’re not living out the Glory Days again. That’s why they’re relegated to The Glory Days. Don’t ruin that experience.
Good quote about Extinction and Evolution from our good friend Dr. Ian Malcom
“This isn’t some species that was obliterated by deforestation, or, or the building of a dam. Dinosaurs had their shot, and nature selected them for extinction.”
The Halo formula worked and had it’s chance. So does this one. Just not for you. Move on.
> > Just to get this straight. I’m all for change…good change…not…bad change.
>
> Well, YOU don’t decide the quality. The collective community does and that results in sales and rating. Reach wasn’t lacking anywhere as near as bad as you claim it did.
>
>
>
> You know what they do to a product that is “broken” and “Faulty”? They scrap or recall them.
>
> In games, they stop releasing the product and shut servers down.
>
>
>
> Hasn’t come anywhere close to happening for Reach yet.
All i have to say is reach compared to black ops…at least black ops kept 90% of its fans lol. They proved that the type of change Reach had was drastic and bad. People want a Halo game not a whole other game. If you want a new game go play something else but dont ruin halo for its true fans.
No but seriously they should focus more on balancing weapons and maps around sprint…
While I agree with you on Sprint, the title is a little too harsh. If they add new things great. I’m hoping that there will be a section where ‘classic’ Halo (Halo 2, Halo 3) can still be played.
> > > Just to get this straight. I’m all for change…good change…not…bad change.
> >
> > Well, YOU don’t decide the quality. The collective community does and that results in sales and rating. Reach wasn’t lacking anywhere as near as bad as you claim it did.
> >
> >
> >
> > You know what they do to a product that is “broken” and “Faulty”? They scrap or recall them.
> >
> > In games, they stop releasing the product and shut servers down.
> >
> >
> >
> > Hasn’t come anywhere close to happening for Reach yet.
>
> All i have to say is reach compared to black ops…at least black ops kept 90% of its fans lol. They proved that the type of change Reach had was drastic and bad. People want a Halo game not a whole other game. If you want a new game go play something else but dont ruin halo for its true fans.
>
> No but seriously they should focus more on balancing weapons and maps around sprint…
Black Ops didn’t change a lot, it was just a bad game.
> <mark>All i have to say is reach compared to black ops</mark>…at least black ops kept 90% of its fans lol. They proved that the type of change Reach had was drastic and bad. People want a Halo game not a whole other game. If you want a new game go play something else but dont ruin halo for its true fans.
>
> No but seriously they should focus more on balancing weapons and maps around sprint…
You’ve said all you have to say and it goes nowhere except to the realms of “ME ME ME”. It’s very present in the entire thread and not just the OP.
Again, thankfully, Halo isn’t built around “What you think.” b/c it’s clearly one sided.
They’re giving the people what they want. I know this b/c the games are being CONSTANTLY played. It’s fact. Sitting right in front of me.
With your posting, there is no “But seriously” b/c you keep contradicting yourself with selfishness and personal preference.
In all seriousness - Go play Black Ops then. It’s got everything you apparently want. Don’t tell me to go play something else when I easily can BUT still enjoy Halo. You’re not enjoying Halo.
Who’s the one that should honestly “go play something else”?
> While I agree with you on Sprint, the title is a little too harsh. If they add new things great. I’m hoping that there will be a section where ‘classic’ Halo (Halo 2, Halo 3) can still be played.
One fo the reasons i called him ignorant was because of his comment about power weapons respawning at random times so the experienced players wont dominate.
honestly…who the hell i sgoing to be experienced at halo 4? its a completely new game…especially maps …everyone has an equal opportunity to learn it.
That whole comment he said nearly made me despise every halo game ever made.
> > While I agree with you on Sprint, the title is a little too harsh. If they add new things great. I’m hoping that there will be a section where ‘classic’ Halo (Halo 2, Halo 3) can still be played.
>
> One fo the reasons i called him ignorant was because of his comment about power weapons respawning at random times so the experienced players wont dominate.
>
> honestly…who the hell i sgoing to be experienced at halo 4? its a completely new game…especially maps …everyone has an equal opportunity to learn it.
>
> That whole comment he said nearly made me despise every halo game ever made.
…You realize that quote notates on the test of time? It’s not going to happen “Day One”.
You keep digging your own hole. Quit while you’re ahead.
> > <mark>All i have to say is reach compared to black ops</mark>…at least black ops kept 90% of its fans lol. They proved that the type of change Reach had was drastic and bad. People want a Halo game not a whole other game. If you want a new game go play something else but dont ruin halo for its true fans.
> >
> > No but seriously they should focus more on balancing weapons and maps around sprint…
>
> You’ve said all you have to say and it goes nowhere except to the realms of “ME ME ME”. It’s very present in the entire thread and not just the OP.
>
> Again, thankfully, Halo isn’t built around “What you think.” b/c it’s clearly one sided.
>
> They’re giving the people what they want. I know this b/c the games are being CONSTANTLY played. It’s fact. Sitting right in front of me.
>
>
> With your posting, there is no “But seriously” b/c you keep contradicting yourself with selfishness and personal preference.
>
>
> In all seriousness - Go play Black Ops then. It’s got everything you apparently want. Don’t tell me to go play something else when I easily can BUT still enjoy Halo. You’re not enjoying Halo.
>
> Who’s the one that should honestly “go play something else”?
OBviously you don’t care about halo’s future…if you want it to be so differentfrom the previous titles.
> > While I agree with you on Sprint, the title is a little too harsh. If they add new things great. I’m hoping that there will be a section where ‘classic’ Halo (Halo 2, Halo 3) can still be played.
>
> One fo the reasons i called him ignorant was because of his comment about power weapons respawning at random times so the experienced players wont dominate.
>
> honestly…who the hell i sgoing to be experienced at halo 4? its a completely new game…especially maps …everyone has an equal opportunity to learn it.
>
> <mark>That whole comment he said nearly made me despise every halo game ever made.</mark>
How does that statement have ANY bearing on the other Halos?
> > > While I agree with you on Sprint, the title is a little too harsh. If they add new things great. I’m hoping that there will be a section where ‘classic’ Halo (Halo 2, Halo 3) can still be played.
> >
> > One fo the reasons i called him ignorant was because of his comment about power weapons respawning at random times so the experienced players wont dominate.
> >
> > honestly…who the hell i sgoing to be experienced at halo 4? its a completely new game…especially maps …everyone has an equal opportunity to learn it.
> >
> > <mark>That whole comment he said nearly made me despise every halo game ever made.</mark>
>
> How does that statement have ANY bearing on the other Halos?
Just knowing he has been the one behind the multiplayer. The multiplayer hasn’t been fun since Halo 3. Even then it got boring fast. It was like a downgrade from Halo 2. They are really good at downgrading…ahem…theatre mode in reach. no 1-50 ranks.
> > While I agree with you on Sprint, the title is a little too harsh. If they add new things great. I’m hoping that there will be a section where ‘classic’ Halo (Halo 2, Halo 3) can still be played.
>
>
> One fo the reasons i called him ignorant was because of his comment about power weapons respawning at random times so the experienced players wont dominate.
>
> honestly…who the hell i sgoing to be experienced at halo 4? its a completely new game…especially maps …everyone has an equal opportunity to learn it.
>
> That whole comment he said nearly made me despise every halo game ever made.
At bold
He never said anything on random spawning weapons. the stupid article said that. It has never been confirmed or denied so no one knows.
Honestly
Amazing players are going to destroy bad players, even with this random element, We did it in bloom and we will do it do it again with that “system” (hope to god its false)
You can not limit player skill, No matter how hard someone tries.
> > > <mark>All i have to say is reach compared to black ops</mark>…at least black ops kept 90% of its fans lol. They proved that the type of change Reach had was drastic and bad. People want a Halo game not a whole other game. If you want a new game go play something else but dont ruin halo for its true fans.
> > >
> > > No but seriously they should focus more on balancing weapons and maps around sprint…
> >
> > You’ve said all you have to say and it goes nowhere except to the realms of “ME ME ME”. It’s very present in the entire thread and not just the OP.
> >
> > Again, thankfully, Halo isn’t built around “What you think.” b/c it’s clearly one sided.
> >
> > They’re giving the people what they want. I know this b/c the games are being CONSTANTLY played. It’s fact. Sitting right in front of me.
> >
> >
> > With your posting, there is no “But seriously” b/c you keep contradicting yourself with selfishness and personal preference.
> >
> >
> > In all seriousness - Go play Black Ops then. It’s got everything you apparently want. Don’t tell me to go play something else when I easily can BUT still enjoy Halo. You’re not enjoying Halo.
> >
> > Who’s the one that should honestly “go play something else”?
>
> OBviously you don’t care about halo’s future…if you want it to be so differentfrom the previous titles.
Halo 2 was radically different from Halo 1 and look how well that game did. Halo 3 changed again and was a bigger success.