Reach takes far more skill than Halo 3. Just saying.
If you’re talking about default Reach, lol.
Shouldn’t this be in the Reach forum?
However yeah I would agree as Reach is a more complex game.
> Reach takes far more skill than Halo 3. Just saying.
Just… WHY?
0/10.
Don’t flame bait.
> > Reach takes far more skill than Halo 3. Just saying.
>
> Just… WHY?
OP just doesn’t give alot of details to why…
> Reach takes far more skill than Halo 3. Just saying.
I agree, with bloom and the nessesity to pace your shots reach does require more skill…dosen’t mean it’s a better game though.
Facts about Reach
- More sticky aim
- Bigger hitboxes with sniper
- More splash damage with explosives
- Worse strafing mechanics than H3
- Took over a year to have settings that actually made people want to play the game competitively
- Even with new settings the last MLG event didn’t sellout team passes
-Nades have an even more randomness when it comes to bouncing physics
-Maps… Penance
-CTF,TS,and oh wait 1 hill map
-Theater 0.5
Don’t take offense OP my post turned into a rant
> Reach takes far more skill than Halo 3. Just saying.
facedesk
While I do like Halo 3 more, and a lot more, can we argue with the Pros? The Pros of Reach (who were mostly all pros in Halo 3 as well) say Reach is better (Needs source). They have more experience with both games than we do… But I still think Halo 3 is better because of the Ranked playlists, and how there’s so much competition compared to just 2, Arena and MLG. Plus a lot more but I will not go on about it.
> Reach takes far more skill than Halo 3. Just saying.
Your joking right? Reach takes NO SKILL to rank up, the more time you spend the higher your rank. Halo 3 required both wins and true skill. Anyone who thinks Reach takes skill is blind because that’s a joke
Halo 3 Takes more Skill …
OP has not played Halo 3 as much as Reach.