Reach takes more skill than 3

Reach takes far more skill than Halo 3. Just saying.

If you’re talking about default Reach, lol.

Shouldn’t this be in the Reach forum?

However yeah I would agree as Reach is a more complex game.

> Reach takes far more skill than Halo 3. Just saying.

Just… WHY?

0/10.

Don’t flame bait.

> > Reach takes far more skill than Halo 3. Just saying.
>
> Just… WHY?

OP just doesn’t give alot of details to why…

> Reach takes far more skill than Halo 3. Just saying.

I agree, with bloom and the nessesity to pace your shots reach does require more skill…dosen’t mean it’s a better game though.

Facts about Reach

  • More sticky aim
  • Bigger hitboxes with sniper
  • More splash damage with explosives
  • Worse strafing mechanics than H3
  • Took over a year to have settings that actually made people want to play the game competitively
  • Even with new settings the last MLG event didn’t sellout team passes
    -Nades have an even more randomness when it comes to bouncing physics
    -Maps… Penance
    -CTF,TS,and oh wait 1 hill map
    -Theater 0.5

Don’t take offense OP my post turned into a rant

> Reach takes far more skill than Halo 3. Just saying.

facedesk

While I do like Halo 3 more, and a lot more, can we argue with the Pros? The Pros of Reach (who were mostly all pros in Halo 3 as well) say Reach is better (Needs source). They have more experience with both games than we do… But I still think Halo 3 is better because of the Ranked playlists, and how there’s so much competition compared to just 2, Arena and MLG. Plus a lot more but I will not go on about it.

> Reach takes far more skill than Halo 3. Just saying.

Your joking right? Reach takes NO SKILL to rank up, the more time you spend the higher your rank. Halo 3 required both wins and true skill. Anyone who thinks Reach takes skill is blind because that’s a joke

Halo 3 Takes more Skill …

OP has not played Halo 3 as much as Reach.