It really is with its matchmaking they finally got right and the more balanced br type gun and no more terrable spawns and them nerfing armorlock was the best thing to put this game as mu fav. halo no matter what you post here I know halo reach is the best halo. Thank me if you think im right
If this claim is true then might have to check, if not then back to Halo 3.
This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not post spam.
I haven’t played the december update so I can’t comment on that which is why I was curious.
0 thanks.
No.
> It really is with its matchmaking they finally got right and the more balanced br type gun and no more terrable spawns and them nerfing armorlock was the best thing to put this game as mu fav. halo no matter what you post here I know halo reach is the best halo. Thank me if you think im right
Are you kidding me kid halo reach is the worst halo game in the series it has the least people online, the worst fan base, and the game is sooooo inconsistent.
None of the Halo Games are superior to each other. That’s just personal preference talking again.
Oh and by the way, Halo: Reach is a spin-off Halo Title and it isn’t part of the Official First Trilogy since that spot belongs to Combat Evolved, Halo 2 and Halo 3.
Halo Wars, Halo 3: ODST, Halo: Reach and Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary are all spin-offs.
> None of the Halo Games are superior to each other. That’s just personal preference talking again.
>
> Oh and by the way, Halo: Reach is a spin-off Halo Title and it isn’t part of the Official First Trilogy since that spot belongs to Combat Evolved, Halo 2 and Halo 3.
>
> Halo Wars, Halo 3: ODST, Halo: Reach and Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary are all spin-offs.
halo wars was a spinoff and pretty much the only one all the others where first person shooters that had a story that had something to do with the covies
> halo wars was a spinoff and pretty much the only one all the others where first person shooters that had a story that had something to do with the covies
Same genre doesn’t mean same plot. The Halo trilogy consists of the three games in which you play as the Master Chief. ODST, Wars, and Reach are all spin-offs. Anniversary isn’t a spin-off so much as it is a revision of part of the trilogy.
(Of course, technically there are now two Halo trilogies, the second consisting of Halos 4-6.)
Reach isn’t even part of the Halo <mark>tri</mark>logy…
> > None of the Halo Games are superior to each other. That’s just personal preference talking again.
> >
> > Oh and by the way, Halo: Reach is a spin-off Halo Title and it isn’t part of the Official First Trilogy since that spot belongs to Combat Evolved, Halo 2 and Halo 3.
> >
> > Halo Wars, Halo 3: ODST, Halo: Reach and Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary are all spin-offs.
>
> halo wars was a spinoff and pretty much the only one all the others where first person shooters that had a story that had something to do with the covies
But they never focused on the story and actions of John-117 did they. The Official Halo Titles have John 117, The Master Chief as the protagonist. He is the main character of the Official Halo Series.
Halo: CE
Halo 2
Halo 3
Halo 4 (TBR)
Halo 5 (TBR)
Halo 6 (TBR)
These are all the official Halo Games. Any games that aren’t those but are set in the Halo Universe are indeed spin-off titles, even in some of those spin-offs keep the same Gameplay Mechanics as the Official Games.
In the back of my head, I keep wanting to call this out as a troll post.
But on topic, Reach isn’t the best Halo game yet. It has the potential to be, if they removed bloom completely and made sprint the only available armor ability, but I doubt that would happen. 
> In the back of my head, I keep wanting to call this out as a troll post.
>
> But on topic, Reach isn’t the best Halo game yet. It has the potential to be, if they removed bloom completely, fixed the weapon sandbox so that no-bloom doesn’t leave it horrendously broken, and then made sprint the only available armor ability, but I doubt that would happen.
Reach isn’t exactly part of the trilogy, I love it most because of its forge and customs.
wtf, reach isnt a part of the trilogy.
and thats a pretty bold statement, reach is only slightly better than ce and 2 because of its netcode.
> None of the Halo Games are superior to each other. That’s just personal preference talking again.
-Yoink-. Superiority itself is nothing more than the ranking of personal preference. There is no conflict between it and the subjective viewpoints brought to the discussion of which Halo is better or worse since both opperate by the same terms. I cannot possibly mean “Reach sucks rancid goat nubblies” by any other way than “I feel that it is the most deficient game of the series given my own tastes and experiences.” So it should just be taken as read that I, for instance, only speak for myself but may still be hitting upon something which you can appeciate too (hence the dialog) so such clumsy, and painfully obvious, clarifications can be avoided.
Reach is the worst of them all. And yeah I know I am gonna name some things that have been named several times but this is why reach is so bad.
Bloom, AA’s, no ranking system, no bleedthrough (default reach)
I wasn’t aware Reach was part of the trilogy. I’m fairly sure the trilogy includes CE, H2, and then H3. Yeah, I’m pretty sure that’s right. Unless of course we’re counting to potato when we think “trilogy”.
This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not flame or attack other members.
IDK about that but it is definitely not as bad as people say. It offers more than any other halo game has ever offered that’s for sure, but it has so much more potential.
If Arena/Invasion/Firefight could be utilized correctly, then holy -Yoink-.