This is ridiculous, Social isn’t ranked, if I get busy and have to quit I should be able to do that in a social game. -Yoink-.
I agree, why would anyone care about the outcome of a social game? It’s just supposed to be for fun, not competitive.
> 2533274866783302;2:
> I agree, why would anyone care about the outcome of a social game? It’s just supposed to be for fun, not competitive.
Not banned anymore, that was quick, but I don’t even feel like playing anymore, that left a bad taste in my mouth. Quitting social shouldn’t cause a ban, PERIOD.
> 2533274866783302;2:
> I agree, why would anyone care about the outcome of a social game? It’s just supposed to be for fun, not competitive.
Unfortunately, 343i seems to think adding “Social” to a gamemode makes it “Social”.
> 2533274939018653;4:
> > 2533274866783302;2:
> > I agree, why would anyone care about the outcome of a social game? It’s just supposed to be for fun, not competitive.
>
>
> Unfortunately, 343i seems to think adding “Social” to a gamemode makes it “Social”.
A lot of 343’s thinking when it comes to this game is rather unfortunate.
I agree, Social isn’t meant to be as serious. It has join in progress, and quitting really shouldn’t be penalized for the non-ranked playlists.
> 2533274843225273;6:
> I agree, Social isn’t meant to be as serious. It has join in progress, and quitting really shouldn’t be penalized for the non-ranked playlists.
Glad to see people are actually agreeing with my topic, I figured I would get nothing but people telling me how wrong I am. Glad to see there are still some sensible people here.
Well, you’re echoing popular sentiment, and social shouldn’t really have bannable quits. It’s… Well… Social… It’s supposed to be for people who want to play online and not give a rat’s bum if they crap on the game…
> 2535462037955640;8:
> Well, you’re echoing popular sentiment, and social shouldn’t really have bannable quits. It’s… Well… Social… It’s supposed to be for people who want to play online and not give a rat’s bum if they crap on the game…
So why is 343 not doing anything to change this?
> 2533274831534658;9:
> > 2535462037955640;8:
> > Well, you’re echoing popular sentiment, and social shouldn’t really have bannable quits. It’s… Well… Social… It’s supposed to be for people who want to play online and not give a rat’s bum if they crap on the game…
>
>
> So why is 343 not doing anything to change this?
Probably busy making more shallow REQs to spam us with. As funny as the Food Themed skins were from the Infinity Armoury update are, I just sighed and saw them as more collectibles that are barring me and my DMR from reuniting. Don’t forget they have to fix the connection issues many people have been having too if it’s still present (haven’t been on Halo 5 for a bit).
Why do you keep posting your replies as a spoiler?
Agreed. The banhammer should be swift and brutal during ranked games, but social should be fun and with the ability to come and go if I need to.
Hopefully if we get enough posts in here about this to get 343 to change this.
Honestly you should still get banned, maybe not as strictly enforced though. Quitters are a plague in this game and you are only adding to the problem. Even in a social playlist it gets annoying when people are constantly quitting out.
Quitting should get you a ban in all types. Don’t join a match if you can’t play it out.
Its an illusion. Its pretty much ranked with levels hidden, same as warzone which is supposed to be chill. Social is not supposed to do that, those are games you go in pop someone and go out.
Ofcourse not, just don’t quit. It’s annoying for your teammates, ranked or social. If you can’t play for the next 10 minutes don’t start the game. If you don’t want a ban, finish your games. Plain and simple.
> 2533274807054874;14:
> Honestly you should still get banned, maybe not as strictly enforced though. Quitters are a plague in this game and you are only adding to the problem. Even in a social playlist it gets annoying when people are constantly quitting out.
The real problem is this trash they call a ranking system and not having options for people who play alone. Like how can they not include individual performance into your rank along with wins/loses?
While yeah it’s social and rank isn’t involved quitting still ruins the game for others playing. You leave them at a disadvantage and they start getting killed more and that usually leads to others quitting. So I still think the ban rules should be in effect. The ban hammer isn’t near as strict as some try to claim. If you are getting bans you deserve them. Don’t start or play games unless you can finish them.
> 2535429600314933;12:
> Agreed. The banhammer should be swift and brutal during ranked games, but social should be fun and with the ability to come and go if I need to.
This!
Having a true social playlist would give casual gamers an option. Social should be totally unranked(no hidden CSR), it shouldn’t count towards your stats and it should have JIP and allow quitting. Betrayals should still be punished though.
As for ranked - it should be strictly enforced. And it should be one gamertag plays ranked per live subscription. I wouldn’t mind if I had to register to play it, as that would mean an end to smurf accounts. I’m sick of playing against “unranked” players at the end of the month. Anyone who gets banned just creates a second account and comes straight back on, what a joke.