As much as I am dying for Halo 4, I don’t want to be begging for more info after every new piece of info we get, mainly because I have other things to do. But did you guys remember Reach, overhyped with the 3 or 4 vidocs they made.
First of all, that’s bad commercializing. You don’t want to do that to a fan base that has been disappointed once already. If they give us specific info, then they’re stuck with forcing us to use it at launch.
Look at Black Ops 2. Yeah, they may have released a detailed trailer and may have released adds already (And whatever CoD craps turns to gold apparently), but to be honest that game looks like crap and will now be stuck looking like crap thanks to the early trailer. It’s best we wait it out until they feel it’s perfect.
try your best to not think of a way to rage please, i don’t want it to be that kind of thread. I just want the community to realize this.
You think this was bad? You should have been around before 343 revealed all this Halo 4 news and BS’d on most of the Sparkasts/weekly updates. 
So sick of hearing this. Reach wasn’t a bad game. Quit toting that around as if it were fact.
All I want to know is the forge.
i’m just saying that they should keep a low profile from now to e3.
Who’s begging for info? We’ve been getting to know a lot about the game for the past few weeks now.
> So sick of hearing this. Reach wasn’t a bad game. Quit toting that around as if it were fact.
Reach had potential, it felt like a rushed game to me. There was really no point in file shares, screen shots, film clips, and such. It was a joke to add that in the game when you can’t even view it. Finding opponents that were decent to play against almost never happens. I don’t want that to happen again, so yes I’m toting this around as if it is fact.
> All I want to know is the forge.
I want the ability to spawn A.I. and dead bodies in forge( assorted aliens and marines).
> So sick of hearing this. Reach wasn’t a bad game. Quit toting that around as if it were fact.
If it was vanilla Reach, then i found it to be garbage.
TU gametypes are much better and while do get bored after a while, less rage is experienced in game.
Despite what others and I may say about Reach; IMO it’s still a Halo game. Far from the best but a Halo game nonetheless.
Otherwise, i would have traded this game in ages ago were it not for my love of Halo. Bungie tried too hard to be like shadowrun (a good game in it’s own right) and ended up nerfing staples of the series in the process (dual wielding, high jump heights, fast movement speeds, strafes etc.)
> Who’s begging for info? We’ve been getting to know a lot about the game for the past few weeks now.
obviously you’re the one person not begging. careful with your words when submitting in a forum full of people concerned for this game (and yes i’m aware you’ll make a come back like everyone else saying, “I could say the same” so i just saved you the trouble).
> > So sick of hearing this. Reach wasn’t a bad game. Quit toting that around as if it were fact.
>
> Reach had potential, it felt like a rushed game to me. There was really no point in file shares, screen shots, film clips, and such. It was a joke to add that in the game when you can’t even view it. Finding opponents that were decent to play against almost never happens. I don’t want that to happen again, so yes I’m toting this around as if it is fact.
Reach out of the BOX might not of been a failure but it was a big let down to most …
But it has gotten much better with each update 343i does
> > So sick of hearing this. Reach wasn’t a bad game. Quit toting that around as if it were fact.
>
>
> If it was vanilla Reach, then i found it to be garbage.
>
>
> TU gametypes are much better and while do get bored after a while, less rage is experienced in game.
>
>
> Despite what others and I may say about Reach; IMO it’s still a Halo game. Far from the best but a Halo game nonetheless.
It’s only natural that people want to know more.
Take a chill pill.