Yup, I saw that while watching the MLG tournement they had at E3. Personally I don’t mind not having it. I know this might bug quite a few people though. There is also a new scoring system, which I kinda like. Assists have been redone. You can get a assist for distracting an enemy while a teammate kills them. There’s so much shown off as far as multiplayer from the MLG tournement. It’s on youtube if you want to watch it. It was presented by Gamespot so it’s on their channel
OLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
From E3 or can’t remember there was a progression rank system and a ranked system with letter and numbers for people that want to be ranked.
> HALO 4 PROGRESSION SYSTEM - CLICK HERE FOR PICTURE
It’s possible there will be more than one kind of ranking system…
> From E3 or can’t remember there was a progression rank system and a ranked system with letter and numbers for people that want to be ranked.
Wow I didn’t see that, do you have a screenshot?
i remember seeing this and hoping that they do an mlg playlist with true skill or this game will be very unappealing after a while towards competitive players
They could being doing a mix of halo 3 and reach. You need cR (now called xp but same thing as cR) and need a certain # rank with it to rank up.
That may be the progression system.
There may be a 1-50 system or something different in Halo 4. In the Xbox Smartglass trailer for Halo 4 there is one scene which said “Frankie just go promoted to A-10” I think. I’m not sure.
If 343i combines the Reach’s progression system and the Halo 3’s Skill system, It would be very awesome. Best of both worlds?
Frankie already said that it is not 1-50 raking system… OLD
> That may be the progression system.
>
> There may be a 1-50 system or something different in Halo 4. In the Xbox Smartglass trailer for Halo 4 there is one scene which said “Frankie just go promoted to A-10” I think. I’m not sure.
>
> If 343i combines the Reach’s progression system and the Halo 3’s Skill system, It would be very awesome. Best of both worlds?
A mix of the 2 is best for everyone
and i think thats what we are getting
> > From E3 or can’t remember there was a progression rank system and a ranked system with letter and numbers for people that want to be ranked.
>
> Wow I didn’t see that, do you have a screenshot?
Can someone find me the screensot of Frankie spartan with the letter/number kinda rank on the side of the regular EXP. I’m kinda lost every video showing it was taken down by Microsoft or put private. I remember someone made a screenshot of it and post it either on Neogaf or waypoint but I can’t find it.
Also there is more proof than that. Frankie actually said they would not put a 1-50 rank in Halo 4 because it encourage boosting.
Honestly, I feel a 1-50 system combined with an EXP/cR system is probably the safe way to go if they want to please the majority fans. It does add a lot of replay value to the game and allows players to strive for something challenging to receive, despite the frustrations that go along with it.
Reach failed in that area, because it didn’t matter if you won or lost, you still got cR toward your next rank. Sure players could still strive for the next rank or a new armor piece, but all you had to do was enter and finish a game and you got what you wanted eventually. That simply doesn’t add enough challenge to the game, and challenge is what keeps the majority of players coming back for more.
I don’t want to speak for everyone, because I know everyone has their own opinions and personal tastes, but in my opinion a 1-50 system is the way to keep players playing. I don’t know about you guys, but I can ignore all the stupid boosters/second accouters, etc. they never stopped me from playing Halo 3 for hours trying to get that 50, and it’s not their fault that I never achieved it… I just wasn’t good enough.
> A mix of the 2 is best for everyone
>
> and i think thats what we are getting
I share the sentiment. Reward players for being good, but give players who are familiar with another system the chance to rank up within a decent amount of time as well.
I’m all for having a progression system and then a separate “competitive” ranking system.
Not only is this old, it proves nothing. Especially when it’s been said by the pros who got to play that 343i mentioned there could be 2 forms of a ranking system. Progressive for a fact and potentially a true skill form.
This is old…
2 systems actually. we have the standard progression system. but modified so those who play the objective and contribute more to the team get more rewarded. think of it as reaches 2.0
then we have something like 1-50 a letter and a number. in your second screen shot you can see this “frankie has reached the rank of A-7”
now thats obv. a place holder. but think of A-Z being the 1-50 where it takes a few good games to go up or a few bad games to go down. then the number 1- whatever being the one that can change from game to game. so one game you could be doing amazing and end up a-8 but the next game you get stomped on and now your A-3.
We already had proof there wouldn’t be 1-50 when Frankie said so months ago…
> 2 systems actually. we have the standard progression system. but modified so those who play the objective and contribute more to the team get more rewarded. think of it as reaches 2.0
>
> then we have something like 1-50 a letter and a number. in your second screen shot you can see this “frankie has reached the rank of A-7”
>
> now thats obv. a place holder. but think of A-Z being the 1-50 where it takes a few good games to go up or a few bad games to go down. then the number 1- whatever being the one that can change from game to game. so one game you could be doing amazing and end up a-8 but the next game you get stomped on and now your A-3.
And all of that is just speculation. None of us know anything about how the ranking system will turn out.
> We already had proof there wouldn’t be 1-50 when Frankie said so months ago…
>
>
> > 2 systems actually. we have the standard progression system. but modified so those who play the objective and contribute more to the team get more rewarded. think of it as reaches 2.0
> >
> > then we have something like 1-50 a letter and a number. in your second screen shot you can see this “frankie has reached the rank of A-7”
> >
> > now thats obv. a place holder. but think of A-Z being the 1-50 where it takes a few good games to go up or a few bad games to go down. then the number 1- whatever being the one that can change from game to game. so one game you could be doing amazing and end up a-8 but the next game you get stomped on and now your A-3.
>
> And all of that is just speculation. None of us know anything about how the ranking system will turn out.
true. but we do know there will be a second ranking system due to the picture weve seen. that was just my idea on the A-7 rank. it does make sense.