Please stop it already

Games Other Halo
1

Can people give 343i a break? First time with halo, they give them hate. Get a poster, 4 codes, 5 maps, 2 helmets, 8 specs, and all I read from these players, except for the beatiful people who actually respect halo, and it’s creators.

But this complaining drones on and on, and on… This thread will stop your pathetic problems.

Level cap- as a Christmas present for those without the LE, you’ll level up after Christmas.

XP Limit- will be fixed in a week.

Textural glitches and collision mesh fallthroughs- will be fixed in a matter of time, which means you won’t be able to go into the vent in complex, not walk in the pillars I. Haven, and the accosional, but rare( contradiction much?) will stop.

DMR reticule having no flinch- Will be NERFd in the coming days or so.

Here’s the main problems people complain about, this game has been out for 3 weeks. Not even a month. And people complain on how it’s bad, and poorly made. This is 343i’s FIRST time making halo, have half of you played the campaign, I’m talking to the whiners, well? Have you, now? THIS is the issue with COD. The campaign is bland, so they make a multiplayer used in 4 other games. World at War, COD4, MW, and Black Ops. Same multiplayer, people apparently love it. Halo is known for it’s story, not multiplayer. How many people call yourselves true fans when you haven’t played campaign? Halo shouldn’t be treated as such. Because updates will come. and your mother’s will take you to McDonald’s. Happy? For all the people that are true fans and agree with me, Halo ninjas, respect ya’ll.

2

Oh God, “true fans” again. That horrid term.

I don’t have a problem with complaining, but I wish it was phrased more respectfully.

3

Please stay at the topic at the topic at hand, please.

4

> Oh God, “true fans” again. That horrid term.
>
> I don’t have a problem with complaining, but I wish it was phrased more respectfully.

You can call it criticism. Somewhere deep within the hoard of whining cry babies is a group of mature people who actually enjoy the game, but maturely point out the faults in the game in hopes that the developers will acknowledge them.

5

Some of the same people who will choose yes will also curse the ground that 343i walks. They are the same people who have been against certain changes down to their core, but yet, bought the game. Very disturbing…

6

but they get buried under an avalanche of the following:

-343i suxxors
-343i thankyou
-343i fix this
-help me
-this is -Blam!-
-this sucks
-stop complaining
-343i, don’t worry
-mindless spam

7

Criticism is what makes the world go around.

By the way, yes, it’s 343i’s first Halo game, yet they did a pretty good job on the Anniversary remake, the DLC maps in Halo Reach weren’t half as bad as these ones, and they had 4-5 Halos to base their game on. They had the blueprint mapped out, they just chose to ignore it.

8

A rabidly optimistic defence is just as unhelpful as heated vitriol, in my opinion.

9

Somewhere deep within, is the right choice of words, it is true hardly anyone makes actual accurate criticism or good points while doing their daily whining.

A few tweaks here and there and the game would benefit of course, but the game at its core is very satisfying and feels like a evolution of Halo 3 in most respects with some additions from Halo 2, Halo Reach within.

My only concern, want, from 343i at this point is the addition of a Classic Slayer Playlist. One without Armor Abilities, Personal Ordinances, would be nice :3.

10

> Halo is known for it’s story, not multiplayer. **

LOL WHAT???
You can’t be serious? Halo is definitely much more well known for its multiplayer than campaign. Halo’s story didn’t put it on the map, multiplayer did.

That statement in itself is just dumb.

11

> By the way, yes, it’s 343i’s first Halo game, yet they did a pretty good job on the Anniversary remake, the DLC maps in Halo Reach weren’t half as bad as these ones, and they had 4-5 Halos to base their game on. They had the blueprint mapped out, they just chose to ignore it.

AND they have several members from Bungie who worked on Halo in the past.

I’m tired of this “it’s their first game” line of reasoning. That is a terrible excuse that doesn’t hold up to any realistic scrutiny. It’s not like these are all folks who have never developed a game before, nor is it like Halo is an all new property.

343i is stacked with experienced developers and backed by the vast resources of Microsoft. They have a rich universe and two console generations of popular games to go by.

And this is the best they could do?

I can’t help but wonder how much better Halo 4 could have been had they not wasted time and resources milking the Halo franchise with Halo CE Anniversary. Instead of making a cheap retro cash grab, they could have used that extra year to bolster H4.

12

> > Halo is known for it’s story, not multiplayer. **
>
> LOL WHAT???
> You can’t be serious? Halo is definitely much more well known for its multiplayer than campaign. Halo’s story didn’t put it on the map, multiplayer did.
>
> That statement in itself is just dumb.

This is incorrect I won’t even bother…

13

The story has always been quite fantastic, and has only needed small improvements game wise now and then, Halo 4’s story is overall very good and is continuing to be just as good with Spartan Ops.

It was Multiplayer however that attracted most casual people over the years, and will be what keeps the game alive in general until Halo 5 is released. The story within the Campaigns, Novels, and other extended universe of Halo, however is also just as important to fans like myself.

You definitely want the Multiplayer to be successful and at its peak at all times, which is why its nice to give developers, regardless of who they are ideas from your own point of view, reasons as to why you think that ideas good, in a respectful way. All the kids, whiners, do is interfere with us having a more enjoyable experience, they have ruined the Halo Community in most aspects. We now have a bunch of spoiled brats who need to get handed everything infecting the Community.

I also agree the Anniversary Maps were well done in most aspects, and overall I enjoy Halo 4’s Maps, however Complex, Abandon, Solace, are just pitiful when it comes to Gameplay.

14

> > By the way, yes, it’s 343i’s first Halo game, yet they did a pretty good job on the Anniversary remake, the DLC maps in Halo Reach weren’t half as bad as these ones, and they had 4-5 Halos to base their game on. They had the blueprint mapped out, they just chose to ignore it.
>
> AND they have several members from Bungie who worked on Halo in the past.
>
> I’m tired of this “it’s their first game” line of reasoning. That is a terrible excuse that doesn’t hold up to any realistic scrutiny. It’s not like these are all folks who have never developed a game before, nor is it like Halo is an all new property.
>
> 343i is stacked with experienced developers and backed by the vast resources of Microsoft. They have a rich universe and two console generations of popular games to go by.
>
> And this is the best they could do?
>
> I can’t help but wonder how much better Halo 4 could have been had they not wasted time and resources milking the Halo franchise with Halo CE Anniversary. Instead of making a cheap retro cash grab, they could have used that extra year to bolster H4.

Yes but 343i hasn’t made any games… *CORRECTION, not for the Xbox 360 platform.

15

> > > Halo is known for it’s story, not multiplayer. **
> >
> > LOL WHAT???
> > You can’t be serious? Halo is definitely much more well known for its multiplayer than campaign. Halo’s story didn’t put it on the map, multiplayer did.
> >
> > That statement in itself is just dumb.
>
> This is incorrect I won’t even bother…

Please bother. I’d like to hear your reasoning as to how Halo is known for its story more than its multiplayer.

How many times do you hear people talk about CE and they bring up the story being what put it on the map? You don’t. The majority of people will say how great and revolutionary its multiplayer was for FPS on console. How many people say, man, Halo 2 had such an amazing story. You don’t. Halo 2 was as popular as it was because of the multiplayer. Same with Halo 3. Halo 4 is no different. That’s a fact, sorry to break it to you.

16

> > Oh God, “true fans” again. That horrid term.
> >
> > I don’t have a problem with complaining, but I wish it was phrased more respectfully.
>
> You can call it criticism. Somewhere deep within the hoard of whining cry babies is a group of mature people who actually enjoy the game, but maturely point out the faults in the game in hopes that the developers will acknowledge them.

Yes the game does have faults and atleast they are gonna fix the problems.

17

Fact? I beg to differ, when people played anniversary, obviously multiplayer, it’s a remake, halo CE multiplayer was awful, no doubt they’d be attracted to it, I’m talking about halo 4. Master Chief’s triumphant return, not “MOAR SOFISTICATED MULTPLAYARR!!” That isn’t what halo’s about, put some work in. At least google the info before posting incorrect propaganda, in which you think multiplayer dominates halo.

18

> > > > Halo is known for it’s story, not multiplayer. **
> > >
> > > LOL WHAT???
> > > You can’t be serious? Halo is definitely much more well known for its multiplayer than campaign. Halo’s story didn’t put it on the map, multiplayer did.
> > >
> > > That statement in itself is just dumb.
> >
> > This is incorrect I won’t even bother…
>
> Please bother. I’d like to hear your reasoning as to how Halo is known for its story more than its multiplayer.
>
> How many times do you hear people talk about CE and they bring up the story being what put it on the map? You don’t. The majority of people will say how great and revolutionary its multiplayer was for FPS on console. How many people say, man, Halo 2 had such an amazing story. You don’t. Halo 2 was as popular as it was because of the multiplayer. Same with Halo 3. Halo 4 is no different. That’s a fact, sorry to break it to you.

There aren’t that many games that come with an amazing story. Halo is known to have that amazing story line. I agree that Halo’s multiplayer is different but I disagree on the fact people don’t talk about the campaigns.

19

Halo nostalgia addiction lvl is 70 but still worth playing

It’s also great to see lvl 70 players showing so much love for Halo 4

Some things you just have to give it time. Like grifball I really can’t wait till that comes in the playlist update.

20

> Fact? I beg to differ, when people played anniversary, obviously multiplayer, it’s a remake, halo CE multiplayer was awful, no doubt they’d be attracted to it, I’m talking about halo 4. Master Chief’s triumphant return, not “MOAR SOFISTICATED MULTPLAYARR!!” That isn’t what halo’s about, put some work in. At least google the info before posting incorrect propaganda, in which you think multiplayer dominates halo.

Not to sound cliche, but you were obviously bad at CE if you think its multiplayer was awful. CE had the largest skill gap out of any of the Halo games. Shooting skill actually meant something in that game where now the auto aim does a lot of the work for us. To simply say its awful is erroneous because if CE didn’t have the multiplayer it did, Halo would not be what it is today.

I also can’t even begin to wrap my head around that you truly believe that the story is what sells the Halo games. Sure its a part of it because there are some gamers who don’t play on xbox live and buy games for the story. Then again, CE didn’t have online play but was still revered for its ground breaking multiplayer. What do I know though, CE had awful multiplayer apparently.

Lastly, about the google thing. You should take your own advice because you will see that I’m not just talking out of my -Yoink-.