…what exactly you want to say with this sentece:"Halo 4 should play like Halo 4???
a completely new gameplay? or just not a remade Halo 3???
cause i think it should be like this:90% halo 2/halo3 and 10% new things so it feels like a new game but still classic,its hard to explain
so what exactly do YOU(people who use that sentence) mean?
However 343i wish to create the game is how Halo 4 should play.
I think it doesn’t matter to anyone on this forum.if your a die hard halo fan then there is nothing you can say to me that will make me doubt you getting the game, because it’s halo.if ign posted a review of halo 4 and gave it a 2 out of 10 (just an example) all of you would still go out and buy it, and so would I. If they made a $150 legendary edition of halo 4 and all it came with other then the game was a chocolate chip I would get it.i hope halo 4 is halo 4.just like halo 2 was halo 2, halo 3 was halo 3, and halo reach was halo reach.
It should play like Halo 2 without the problems.
Whatever 343 feels is right. The world is their oyster as far as Halo goes.
> However 343i wish to create the game is how Halo 4 should play.
This is how I interpret it when I see it used.
> > However 343i wish to create the game is how Halo 4 should play.
>
> This is how I interpret it when I see it used.
Because if you wanted to play Halo 2 then go and play halo 2 its just that its going to be a different game they should take bits and pieces from every game halo thats the smartest thing they could to.
As long as it doesn’t play like Reach the hardcore and casual community alike will be ecstatic.
Halo 4 should be played like Chess. Both sides are equal but the person with more skill will put their opponent in checkmate.
I’d completely agree, on the condition that the core physics and aspects of the game remain.
> I think it doesn’t matter to anyone on this forum.if your a die hard halo fan then there is nothing you can say to me that will make me doubt you getting the game, because it’s halo.if ign posted a review of halo 4 and gave it a 2 out of 10 (just an example) all of you would still go out and buy it, and so would I. If they made a $150 legendary edition of halo 4 and all it came with other then the game was a chocolate chip I would get it.i hope halo 4 is halo 4.just like halo 2 was halo 2, halo 3 was halo 3, and halo reach was halo reach.
If IGN gave it 2 out of 10 I wouldn’t care because its IGN.
It should be all new.
If you want to play Halo 2 or 3 then holy cow put those disks in and play them. Don’t waste our money giving us a rehash of an old game.
When I say “Halo 4 should play like Halo 4” I mean "Halo 4 should play like Halo 4, hur dur, Take the good bits of past games, and leave the bad bits behind. Doesn’t matter if the past game was viewed as BAD like say Reach, take the good stuff that wasn’t a total flop, like the new forge tools in Reach, and what not, and dump the crap like AA and super bounces.
Saying “Halo 4 should be like Halo CE”, “Halo 4 should be like Halo 2”, and “Halo 4 should be like Halo 3”, is basically a bunch of kids wanting 343i to copy some of Bungie’s work, and not try doing their own thing, that and copy COD in the “We’ll re texture every thing, change up the weapons a little, change the event locations in the campaign, and change the character and then release the same thing over and over again” plan.
I like game sequels that aren’t copies of the past games, but have their own feel to them, but still has the past game as a base of which it stand.
Think as video games as humans, and sequels of that video games are kids of those past video games, You may look like your parents, but you are totally different from your parents.
> Halo 4 should be played like Chess. Both sides are equal but the person with more skill will put their opponent in checkmate.
Actually the black team is better. Scientific fact.
> If IGN gave it 2 out of 10 I wouldn’t care because its IGN.
I would, because IGN LOVES HALO, and if IGN came out and gave a Halo game a very low score, I would be worried.
> > Halo 4 should be played like Chess. Both sides are equal but the person with more skill will put their opponent in checkmate.
>
> Actually the black team is better. Scientific fact.
Or as I like to call them “Team Ninja”
Halo 4 is the start of a NEW trilogy.
Halo 4 is being developed by a NEW developer.
Halo 4 should be Halo 4 meaning Halo 4 being made by a new developer and the beginning of a new trilogy should not be the same -Yoink- that Halo CE-Halo Reach was.
People should accept it as a clean slate. You have some awesome developers at 343i. I have no freaking clue how anybody could want them to just follow in the shadow of bungie and make the same games instead of making their own imprint on the gaming world…
> > If IGN gave it 2 out of 10 I wouldn’t care because its IGN.
>
> I would, because IGN LOVES HALO, and if IGN came out and gave a Halo game a very low score, I would be worried.
IGN have given a lot of good games low scores and a lot of terrible games high scores. In most of their Halo 4 related articles they’ve written a lot of incoherent crap that shows that a lot of the story has gone way over their heads.
> Halo 4 is the start of a NEW trilogy.
>
> Halo 4 is being developed by a NEW developer.
>
> Halo 4 should be Halo 4 meaning Halo 4 being made by a new developer and the beginning of a new trilogy should not be the same Yoink! that Halo CE-Halo Reach was.
>
> People should accept it as a clean slate. You have some awesome developers at 343i. I have no freaking clue how anybody could want them to just follow in the shadow of bungie and make the same games instead of making their own imprint on the gaming world…
BUT my little friend,halo 4 is a SEQUEL!,how the -Yoink- could they drop anything what made halo 2 and 3 so popular?
> When I say “Halo 4 should play like Halo 4” I mean "Halo 4 should play like Halo 4, hur dur, Take the good bits of past games, and leave the bad bits behind. Doesn’t matter if the past game was viewed as BAD like say Reach, take the good stuff that wasn’t a total flop, like the new forge tools in Reach, and what not, and dump the crap like AA and super bounces.
> Saying “Halo 4 should be like Halo CE”, “Halo 4 should be like Halo 2”, and “Halo 4 should be like Halo 3”, is basically a bunch of kids wanting 343i to copy some of Bungie’s work, and not try doing their own thing, that and <mark>copy COD in the “We’ll re texture every thing, change up the weapons a little, change the event locations in the campaign, and change the character and then release the same thing over and over again” plan.</mark>
>
> I like game sequels that aren’t copies of the past games, but have their own feel to them, but still has the past game as a base of which it stand.
>
> Think as video games as humans, and sequels of that video games are kids of those past video games, You may look like your parents, but you are totally different from your parents.
BUT that cod rehash thing works! you can see the same population like in MW2,i mean 343 could try it and look if it works,i mean i would totally love 90% halo 3 in halo 4 with some new features new maps…and 343 needs to make it like this,cause its a -Yoinking!- SEQUEL!
Man OP, you really can’t let the whole concept of people don’t wanting H4 to be a copy of H3 go can you?
What we mean with H4 should play like H4, is that 343i should not turn H4 into a lazy copy of H3 or H2 or any other Halo game for that matter. No matter how great (esspecially H2) they were.
H4 should be unique within the series just like every other Halo (with the exception of H3 which was too similar (in a bad way) to H2 to for my liking) has been.
It shouldn’t dwell in the past. It shouldn’t copy things directly from it’s predecessors. It should have all the elements that make Halo, Halo but in its own distinct way. 343i should take notice of all the right elements of every Halo game and should take those elements and turn them into a new, fresh, experience with its own “feeling” and “style”.
That’s what “we” mean. We’re not against the right things from Halo’s past being used. We’re just against a lazy carbon copy that “you” (and don’t take this personally, this is a “you” as in "those who don’t want H4 to be “itself”) guys want it to be.