Yes it does.
You want to use it to showcase that classic Halo isn’t popular to view.
Then you talk about massive updates and whatnot, but lose it when the same method is applied to you with Halo 5’s viewership.
You can’t ignore a “modern” game when you talk “modern games”, and by pretty much all accounts, Halo 5 is regarded to be a “modern game”.
And the thing we “slow and dishonest” people are attempting to latch onto is… What exactly?
Because that’s what you did.
“Uuuh, Halo needs to modernize with X and/or Y and Z uuh”
“Can’t look back, scary twitch numbers on MCC, no one watching”
Then goes “listen here you little…”
When the exact same thing you did, gets Uno reversed to you.
The entire point was to showcase what kind of change you don’t want to see. All the while explaining changes you want to see.
The instance you throw in some sort of number you open up for comparisons.
You don’t want to see a move towards classic, and justify that with a low viewership on MCC. Talking about more “modern” stuff to utilise. So how is it not relevant then to do the same for that? The viewership for the Halo game featuring most of what you want? Hm? Throwing a hissy fit over that is silly.
The thing you’ve concentrated on for the entirety of the discussion is this single thing.
While I’ve given other alternative means for “change” in the franchise, that you’ve conveniently ignored.
Nobody is saying Halo can’t change, there’s just a disagreement in what direction it needs to be taken, what kind of changes people want.
I can’t be wrong on something I personally want, neither can you.
Inb4 stuff like this so there can be a proper discussion:
View at own discretion.