This logic is basically just victim blaming. At least that’s how it comes off to me personally, kinda like saying “It’s YOUR fault you get harassed for going out and being proud of who you are when the status quo insists that you be ashamed!” Like pardon us for being happy and wanting to express that pride to show that we refuse to be spooked back into the closet, which is basically the root of us showing off our queerness in the first place even if the reasons beyond that have changed over time. At least that’s my view.
That argument would work, if the OP hadnt said this:
In this case, they are admitting to desiring to be victimized.
How is that admitting to wanting to be victimized?
Because their target is people who are offended by them and will lash out against them
And that’s her fault for being proud of her identity?
(edited to correct pronouns, I derped and forgot to check them)
Yes, because they are the instigators in this circumstance. Its not just a matter of pride at this point. They have already admitted to actively seeking out provocation. Its like going to a bar and getting in everybodies face and saying, “I’m trans and can drink you under the table.” They are seeking provocation. Yes. It is their fault
This just sounds an awful lot like “I want a valid excuse to tell off a trans person and will macguyver one out of literally anything I can find”
Or im calling them out for admitting to causing problems and wanting to ban people for the problems they caused
How is proclaiming one’s transness or queerness in general causing problems?
Its not, but when they say stuff like this
“My desire to trigger people when i stomp them.” THATS what i want you to focus on.
You really like taking that quote out of context of the larger conversation don’t you?
And you really like ignoring the sentiment of my argument for the sake of trying to paint me as a bigot.
Do you get a nickel for every time you argue on these forums man? ![]()
Remember that time you called me a stalker for replying to you on the same post that i first ever replied to you? ![]()
If someone is going to spew BS, I’m going to call them on it.
They make it sound like you post lots of BS ngl
Thats fine, I dont really care about it. What I’m calling this person out for is provoking those things. You want peace, yet you actively seek hostility?
I’ll have what she’s having ![]()
I ended our conversation with bygones… geeze angelhypocracy or whatever your name is
Our mere existence promotes hostility, dude. Even being as nice as she possibly could, they’d do the same thing for the same reason with the same intensity. They’re bigots, it’s what they do.
Talk about hypocrisy man. You just begged me to leave you alone on one post and now youre starting more? Get on with your life. Get a grip.
So you think more hostility is the answer then?