May I please play with people who are least most likely to quit? I would love to have that. I still wish that players would fill in the gap like you can in Custom. That’s it.
The first idea you had is what I’ve been suggesting for ages. Matching players with similar quit percentages and removing the quit ban entirely seems like the perfect solution IMO.
> I still wish that players would fill in the gap like you can in Custom. That’s it.
No. I do not want every game I join to end up like phase 1 of invasion where everyone quits and all the defenders spawn kill you at start. Think before you bring up stupid suggestions.
> The first idea you had is what I’ve been suggesting for ages. Matching players with similar quit percentages and removing the quit ban entirely seems like the perfect solution IMO.
Thats a great idea match people with similar quit percentage. Would be a lot better than quit ban. while were on the whole banning subject I think mute ban should be removed, it really just kills game chat. party chats already got that covered. I may be an american but i’m not so fat that I can’t use a controller to mute someone. Anyone who is to fat to mute someone they’re self should have to listen to ear rape until they work up enough finger strength to mute for themselves.
> > I still wish that players would fill in the gap like you can in Custom. That’s it.
>
> No. I do not want every game I join to end up like phase 1 of invasion where everyone quits and all the defenders spawn kill you at start. Think before you bring up stupid suggestions.
what are you talking about? the OP is talking about a game not being closed to new players jumping in, which would actually make Invasion more of a playable game type. I’m all for that. right now there is the risk of people leaving with no hope of filling in the gap and being left a few men down, hugely destroying game balance. AI roles would have come in handy with the addition of no closed matches allowing players to replace AI’s, and AI’s to replace missing players. to much of a change for reach, but maybe halo 4 could have this, I hope.
> > > I still wish that players would fill in the gap like you can in Custom. That’s it.
> >
> > No. I do not want every game I join to end up like phase 1 of invasion where everyone quits and all the defenders spawn kill you at start. Think before you bring up stupid suggestions.
>
> what are you talking about? the OP is talking about a game not being closed to new players jumping in, which would actually make Invasion more of a playable game type. I’m all for that. right now there is the risk of people leaving with no hope of filling in the gap and being left a few men down, hugely destroying game balance. AI roles would have come in handy with the addition of no closed matches allowing players to replace AI’s, and AI’s to replace missing players. to much of a change for reach, but maybe halo 4 could have this, I hope.
MaxSterling. No idea is stupid… And OP I agree with removal of quit ban. Also removal of AFK ban. Afkers should get booted after 2 mins in the same spawn. This would only work if the quit ban is removed too. And I agree we need people to fill in spots in games.