If I could change one thing about Halo 5 it would be the ranking system. I would love for it to return to the classic 1-50 scale. The current ranking system seems flawed. It’s weird how it all works to me. How I see it is this ranking system kinda failed in Reach, so it is very surprising they brought it back. I personally don’t like this ranking system, do you agree with me?
I would change the campaign narrative to be honest.
> 2533274824790279;1:
> If I could change one thing about Halo 5 it would be the ranking system. I would love for it to return to the classic 1-50 scale. The current ranking system seems flawed. It’s weird how it all works to me. How I see it is this ranking system kinda failed in Reach, so it is very surprising they brought it back. I personally don’t like this ranking system, do you agree with me?
Yeah the good ol’ Halo 2 rank symbols were in my opinion to coolest looking and seemed the most balanced and challenging and it was simplified win games you rank up lose games you go down if they would just go back to that seems like people would cry less about balanced games maybe maybe not people always have to whine about something
> 2533274904245048;2:
> I would change the campaign narrative to be honest.
I’ve played through the campaign 3 times now. I feel like it would have been better if the build up wasn’t so misleading. With the Locke vs Chief stuff. It also feels off compared to the other campaigns. Idk it’s hard explain it for me at the moment.
Campaign did suck^^^
I think the ranking system is okay but I do agree that a 1-50 would be better.
The things I don’t like about it.
The ranks reset each month…If they split the year up into 4 quarters, I feel like that would be as frequent as it needs to be. Once a month is just too often.
I don’t like the CSR number or whatever you call that rank that is based on XP. I guess some people are proud of that, but I feel that it is just a useless rank that only determines how often someone plays the game. You get a similar amount of XP win or lose. I just don’t understand it.
I DO like how accurately this Halo has been able to match up people with similar skill. I find that most matches are pretty tight and competitive for both teams. Ultimately, this is all that I really care about. So I’m not too upset with the ranking system.
Reach had a ranking system? I thought it was just Xp based.
anyways all of halos ranking systems are flawed, they’ve all be exploited and whatnot. I don’t care which one is put in so long as it does its job most of the time. I’m ok with 1-50 or h5s current system. Don’t want reaches or h4s in 6 tho.
> 2533274796410651;3:
> > 2533274824790279;1:
> > If I could change one thing about Halo 5 it would be the ranking system. I would love for it to return to the classic 1-50 scale. The current ranking system seems flawed. It’s weird how it all works to me. How I see it is this ranking system kinda failed in Reach, so it is very surprising they brought it back. I personally don’t like this ranking system, do you agree with me?
>
>
> Yeah the good ol’ Halo 2 rank symbols were in my opinion to coolest looking and seemed the most balanced and challenging and it was simplified win games you rank up lose games you go down if they would just go back to that seems like people would cry less about balanced games maybe maybe not people always have to whine about something
I completely agree, simplicity is best to me. At least for the ranking system. And I honestly don’t see more balanced games with the current ranking system. That was the main thing for them to make the category system. The 1-50 scale felt great. Grinding to rank up. The number system was so much more satisfying and gratifying. Like bragging rights sorta speak.
> 2628440139686205;5:
> Campaign did suck^^^
>
> I think the ranking system is okay but I do agree that a 1-50 would be better.
> The things I don’t like about it.
> The ranks reset each month…If they split the year up into 4 quarters, I feel like that would be as frequent as it needs to be. Once a month is just too often.
> I don’t like the CSR number or whatever you call that rank that is based on XP. I guess some people are proud of that, but I feel that it is just a useless rank that only determines how often someone plays the game. You get a similar amount of XP win or lose. I just don’t understand it.
> I DO like how accurately this Halo has been able to match up people with similar skill. I find that most matches are pretty tight and competitive for both teams. Ultimately, this is all that I really care about. So I’m not too upset with the ranking system.
I like the combo of the the csr and the sr. The csr generally gives you an idea of the players skill, while the sr let’s you know how much they play. That information together can, more often than not, give you an idea of what to expect from a player.
> 2628440139686205;5:
> Campaign did suck^^^
>
> I think the ranking system is okay but I do agree that a 1-50 would be better.
> The things I don’t like about it.
> The ranks reset each month…If they split the year up into 4 quarters, I feel like that would be as frequent as it needs to be. Once a month is just too often.
> I don’t like the CSR number or whatever you call that rank that is based on XP. I guess some people are proud of that, but I feel that it is just a useless rank that only determines how often someone plays the game. You get a similar amount of XP win or lose. I just don’t understand it.
> I DO like how accurately this Halo has been able to match up people with similar skill. I find that most matches are pretty tight and competitive for both teams. Ultimately, this is all that I really care about. So I’m not too upset with the ranking system.
The 1-50 scale is classic Halo. And I believe now they can make where people can’t boost and all that. They can upgrade it.
> 2533274824790279;7:
> > 2533274796410651;3:
> > > 2533274824790279;1:
> > > If I could change one thing about Halo 5 it would be the ranking system. I would love for it to return to the classic 1-50 scale. The current ranking system seems flawed. It’s weird how it all works to me. How I see it is this ranking system kinda failed in Reach, so it is very surprising they brought it back. I personally don’t like this ranking system, do you agree with me?
> >
> >
> > Yeah the good ol’ Halo 2 rank symbols were in my opinion to coolest looking and seemed the most balanced and challenging and it was simplified win games you rank up lose games you go down if they would just go back to that seems like people would cry less about balanced games maybe maybe not people always have to whine about something
>
>
> I completely agree, simplicity is best to me. At least for the ranking system. And I honestly don’t see more balanced games with the current ranking system. That was the main thing for them to make the category system. The 1-50 scale felt great. Grinding to rank up. The number system was so much more satisfying and gratifying. Like bragging rights sorta speak.
I agree. This system lacks balance. I’m never matched up consistently. It has been better as of late but the 1-50 would have eliminated the need for placement matches. Yeah you might have played some lower skilled players for the first week or so but after that it would have been a rarity. It would also keep players from sandbagging and ranking in lower levels on purpose. Of course it had it’s flaws (Boosting) but in the end there was nothing more satisfying than seeing your Rank rise at the end of a day that you’ve been grinding.
> 2533274848763524;10:
> > 2533274824790279;7:
> > > 2533274796410651;3:
> > > > 2533274824790279;1:
> > > > If I could change one thing about Halo 5 it would be the ranking system. I would love for it to return to the classic 1-50 scale. The current ranking system seems flawed. It’s weird how it all works to me. How I see it is this ranking system kinda failed in Reach, so it is very surprising they brought it back. I personally don’t like this ranking system, do you agree with me?
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah the good ol’ Halo 2 rank symbols were in my opinion to coolest looking and seemed the most balanced and challenging and it was simplified win games you rank up lose games you go down if they would just go back to that seems like people would cry less about balanced games maybe maybe not people always have to whine about something
> >
> >
> > I completely agree, simplicity is best to me. At least for the ranking system. And I honestly don’t see more balanced games with the current ranking system. That was the main thing for them to make the category system. The 1-50 scale felt great. Grinding to rank up. The number system was so much more satisfying and gratifying. Like bragging rights sorta speak.
>
> I agree. This system lacks balance. I’m never matched up consistently. It has been better as of late but the 1-50 would have eliminated the need for placement matches. Yeah you might have played some lower skilled players for the first week or so but after that it would have been a rarity. It would also keep players from sandbagging and ranking in lower levels on purpose. Of course it had it’s flaws (Boosting) but in the end there was nothing more satisfying than seeing your Rank rise at the end of a day that you’ve been grinding.