Ok,let me get this straight....

I’ve noticed that alot of folks keep saying H4 is alot like COD or Call of Duty in that case,because of additional stuff added such as sprint etc. I’ve never really played COD so I myself wouldn’t know.

and yet,at the same time there’s another argument that while COD fans enjoy everygame because it’s “the same” in ever game and that Halo fans will enjoy Halo more if it was “the same” in ever game

wouldn’t that mean that either way it’d be like COD anywho?

like COD it would be the same in ever game,with little to anything new added,just a few trinkets and weapons here and there,and at the same time.if to many new features are added it’d not be “Halo” enough for alot of the folks who favor the old Halos.

so…that could mean that either way Halo be like COD in one aspect or another,your thoughts?

I personally seem a bit confused by all these arguments getting thrown back and fourth,perhaps both sides who make these statments can elaborate more?

Don’t try to make sense of it, it’s hopeless. There is no reasoning with them.

COD comparison thread… probably be locked… I myself believe COD is a simplistic FPS, people seem to enjoy that. Thus it keeps making money, The company feels no need to change. Now other companies see how good that formula works, so they mix it up with their games, i.e. Gears/Halo both aiming toward casuals while trying to keep their original fan base.

I too have never played a CoD game before. The only reason I ever even bought Xboxes over the last ten years was to play Halo.

I never get to contribute to the endless Cod vs Halo threads…

If -Yoink!- would step back and let Halo be its own game, rather than jealously eyeing CoDs fan base, this game might have been half decent.

Never played Call of Duty? 0_o

Please refrain from making COD vs Halo threads or comparison threads. They always go down the same road and end the same way. Hope you understand. Thanks.