This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not make non-constructive posts or biased polls.
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
Ok, first of all perks are stupid. There for call of duty, a game filled with noobs that think that they are good at FPS games. If 343 does add perks to Halo 4, It will die. Halo 2 and 3, had the best multiplayer they didn’t have perks. Reach only gets like 100,000 players on a good day, that’s ever since Black ops came out. Why because the armor abilities made it to different. Make it like Halo 3, Don’t try to make Halo 4 different from 2 and 3. Perks will Kill this game, armor abilities killed reach. Learn from that!
This poll is biased, but I will agree I don’t like the perks. The problem with Reach was that Bungie saw the success of the Call of Duty series at the time and tried to implement features from that series over to Halo in order to pull players towards their game. This is NOT what Halo is meant to be. Halo is ORIGINAL and should remain that way. They need to come up with completely new ideas like they always have in the past and stop trying to relate to Call of Duty and Battlefield players with perks.
Is it me or is this poll a bit unfair? If you choose perks you say we are noobs and require them to help us, yet if we pick no then it is apparently the right answer.
Yeah I’ve got to say that I agree with you there, if I wanted to play a game with perks then I would go play COD. However I’m not, I’m playing halo. Don’t ruin it.
> Is it me or is this poll a bit unfair? If you choose perks you say we are noobs and require them to help us, yet if we pick no then it is apparently the right answer.
When I play Cod, I never use cheap perks like Assassin and slight of hand. Because then It’s unfair that’s why perks are stupid. In Cod for example 2 players have same guns, one has slight of hand the other doesn’t. The player with it wins the gun fight. Simple as that.
> How about if you Stop Byoinking and use some real arguments about how Perks are that bad instead of calling people Stubids and Noobs?
Sadly, it seems fear and anger cloud many people’s judgement.
Bit offtopic, but if AA ruined Reach so much, yet why is it ahead of Halo 3 in Live population? Halo 3 kept declining. Just curious, nothing more.(I know that popularity does not necessarily equal quality.)
> > 343i never called them “perks”, that was the media. Plus you have no idea how they even WORK.
>
> Just cause they aren’t called perks doesn’t change the fact that they are perks.
It´s the terminology.
If they weren´t called “perks” it´s for a reason, they might be sustancially different for perks.
don’t worry cuz i dont think he meant it like those kind of perk because their bad for you and never take them and secondly i hope they stick with the loadouts and that is if they stick with the aas
> > Is it me or is this poll a bit unfair? If you choose perks you say we are noobs and require them to help us, yet if we pick no then it is apparently the right answer.
>
> When I play Cod, I never use cheap perks like Assassin and slight of hand. Because then It’s unfair that’s why perks are stupid. In Cod for example 2 players have same guns, one has slight of hand the other doesn’t. The player with it wins the gun fight. Simple as that.
That isn’t a reason to create a biased poll, trying to make one side better than the other. Biased polls are against the rules.
> > > 343i never called them “perks”, that was the media. Plus you have no idea how they even WORK.
> >
> > Just cause they aren’t called perks doesn’t change the fact that they are perks.
>
> It´s the terminology.
>
> If they weren´t called “perks” it´s for a reason, they might be sustancially different for perks.
Bungie said that load outs weren’t classes, yet they are. They are simply saying because it is tied with your armor and they give it a halo type name they different.
> > How about you people wait and see how Halo 4 perks work and how they fit before claiming that they will kill the game.
>
> Any “perk” system will inevitably add something undesirable to the game.
Its still not a good idea to jump to conclusions this early.
> > 343i never called them “perks”, that was the media. Plus you have no idea how they even WORK.
>
> Just cause they aren’t called perks doesn’t change the fact that they are perks.
And evidence for your argument is where? How is it perk? Have you seen how it works?
> > > 343i never called them “perks”, that was the media. Plus you have no idea how they even WORK.
> >
> > Just cause they aren’t called perks doesn’t change the fact that they are perks.
>
> And evidence for your argument is where? How is it perk? Have you seen how it works?
A piece of amor that you can change to give you an advantage/ability is a perk. Just cause call of duty doesn’t give a visual to see what perk someone has doesn’t mean that they work any different, actually that is the only difference between the two right there…