I couldn’t find the old petition so I decided to make a new one.
So, plz sign if you wan’t Halo to… basically be Halo.
Old petition
Thanks to Link1201
List: ODST1337
Is this the thread you are referring to?
https://halo.xbox.com/Forums/yaf_postst7389_Official-petition-against-AA-s-in-Halo-4-multiplayer.aspx
Yes, thank you 
> Yes, thank you
Sure anytime. Things got a little moved around during the switch to the new forums.
Have fun wasting your time
> Have fun wasting your time
How am I wasting my time? Im gameing while having the thread up.
> > Have fun wasting your time
>
> How am I wasting my time? Im gameing while having the thread up.
Well played, sir. It’s just that online petitions never really accomplish much.
Plus, whatever 343 has in store for Halo 4 is already long past the “idea-generating” stage. If they’re working AAs (or something like them) in Halo 4 it’s too late to simply remove them from the current build of the game. Especially because things like map and level design take every ability you have into account while being made. If 343 is working on a AA-equivalent, they would have to retool the entire rest of the game if they took it out this far into the development cycle. That would be a huge waste of time, talent, and money.
> > > Have fun wasting your time
> >
> > How am I wasting my time? Im gameing while having the thread up.
>
> Well played, sir. It’s just that online petitions never really accomplish much.
>
> Plus, whatever 343 has in store for Halo 4 is already long past the “idea-generating” stage. If they’re working AAs (or something like them) in Halo 4 it’s too late to simply remove them from the current build of the game. Especially because things like map and level design take every ability you have into account while being made. If 343 is working on a AA-equivalent, they would have to retool the entire rest of the game if they took it out this far into the development cycle. That would be a huge waste of time, talent, and money.
I know, I know.
> > > Have fun wasting your time
> >
> > How am I wasting my time? Im gameing while having the thread up.
>
> Well played, sir. It’s just that online petitions never really accomplish much.
>
> Plus, whatever 343 has in store for Halo 4 is already long past the “idea-generating” stage. If they’re working AAs (or something like them) in Halo 4 it’s too late to simply remove them from the current build of the game. Especially because things like map and level design take every ability you have into account while being made. If 343 is working on a AA-equivalent, they would have to retool the entire rest of the game if they took it out this far into the development cycle. That would be a huge waste of time, talent, and money.
And how do you know 343 isn’t different? They sure look at their forums more than anyone I’ve seen.
True, but I sort of doubt they would be. For one it doesn’t fit canon, and I doubt they’d add AA’s in multiplayer but not campaign. This is also their first actually new halo game, and if they displease many people by adding AA’s and essentially keeping halo the same as the last because of it, even though Halo 4 is supposed to be a sequel to Halo 3, not Reach, then they are going to make a lot of people not want to trust them. It’s a matter of gaining our trust first, then experimenting a bit I’d imagine.
> > > > Have fun wasting your time
> > >
> > > How am I wasting my time? Im gameing while having the thread up.
> >
> > Well played, sir. It’s just that online petitions never really accomplish much.
> >
> > Plus, whatever 343 has in store for Halo 4 is already long past the “idea-generating” stage. If they’re working AAs (or something like them) in Halo 4 it’s too late to simply remove them from the current build of the game. Especially because things like map and level design take every ability you have into account while being made. If 343 is working on a AA-equivalent, they would have to retool the entire rest of the game if they took it out this far into the development cycle. That would be a huge waste of time, talent, and money.
>
> And how do you know 343 isn’t different? They sure look at their forums more than anyone I’ve seen.
>
> True, but I sort of doubt they would be. For one it doesn’t fit canon, and I doubt they’d add AA’s in multiplayer but not campaign. This is also their first actually new halo game, and if they displease many people by adding AA’s and essentially keeping halo the same as the last because of it, even though Halo 4 is supposed to be a sequel to Halo 3, not Reach, then they are going to make a lot of people not want to trust them. It’s a matter of gaining our trust first, then experimenting a bit I’d imagine.
Pretty much. Halo 4 is the make or break game.
I doubt 343i would have Armor Abilities in Halo 4 anyways, if they do stay true to the past Halo games were (CE, 2 & 3), then there is no need for this silly petition.
I think Armor Abilities were a one time thing in the Halo Universe, cause really MC-117 didn’t have any throughout… so logically speaking Halo 4 won’t have them.
Silly petition is silly.
> I doubt 343i would have Armor Abilities in Halo 4 anyways, if they do stay true to the past Halo games were (CE, 2 & 3), then there is no need for this silly petition.
>
> I think Armor Abilities were a one time thing in the Halo Universe, cause really MC-117 didn’t have any throughout… so logically speaking Halo 4 won’t have them.
>
> Silly petition is silly.
It’s not silly.
Because 343i can stick them in anytime they want and call them “Forerunner Abilities”, or some BS like that. How do you think AAs got into Reach? They can literally do whatever they want. We just want to make sure that doesn’t include AAs.
AA ruin the game , with these AA’s I don’t feel that I’n playing the same halo that I play it since Halo 2 , Classic Halo is the best , I wish they make it with equipment like Halo 3
> AA ruin the game , with these AA’s I don’t feel that I’n playing the same halo that I play it since Halo 2 , Classic Halo is the best , I wish they make it with equipment like Halo 3
Me too.
I signed