I, as a halo vet, think that since halo 4 has copied many things from previous halos, should have something to spice it up a little more(not like it isn’t a ball o death already). Weapon attachments. Not big things like, a bigger clip, but small things like, a improved loadout scope, for the LR BR and DMR.
Ahhhhh no…
No game changing things, only visual, then I would be for it.
Changing weapon behaviour and such, no thank you.
Halo’s not the kind of game where gameplay changing attachments would work, but yeah, I’d be down for some aesthetic attachments. Maybe even suppressors, but that’s as far as I’d go.
Oh god no. Attachments are for CoD kiddies, leave it there for them. Dont infect Halo with more CoD than it already has.
No, bad idea.
Honestly halo couldn’t get much worse than it is already so who cares.
Why not?
Just add more things to Halo that are used in Call of Duty.
What will it hurt?
No i dont feel the need. Im happy with what Halo 4 gave us. I know alot of gamers dont like loadouts but i find they make it better cause players can play more now based off their playstyle. BUt adding things like that dont make sence because you dont hold left trigger to aim down the sights like you do in other shooters. Just some of the weapons in Halo have a 2x zoom and others dont
> Oh god no. Attachments are for CoD kiddies, leave it there for them. Dont infect Halo with more CoD than it already has.
Is the US army kiddies for using attachments too?
COD didnt come up with the idea, it was merely bringing in real life elements. Why in the future would attachments be no more.
Halo has pretty much nowhere to go but “magic sci-fi powers” if they are trying to avoid anything resembling cod.
I’m not saying I’m for attachments, but I think hating an idea simply because its in COD, especially when it has solid basis in the real world, is just silly.
We’re kind of running out of buttons for new stuff, and attachments would be too radical to add to h4. Maybe h5.
People are complaining that this game is getting to CoDish with the loadouts, and you wanna go and make it worse with weapon attachments?
No.
And I swear, if I start hearing suppressors/silencers in Halo 5, I will go to 343’s headquarters and start choking people until I find the idiot who put them in. And hang him from the front of the building.
> Oh god no. Attachments are for CoD kiddies, leave it there for them. Dont infect Halo with more CoD than it already has.
Oh god i know, my brother got onto my profile while I went to the bathroom. the visual idea is good, the whole concept of, as my stupid brother said, ‘‘Spice it up’’ was just an idiot attempt as a cod player to change the whole concept of the game halo, the kill cam should go first.
2/10
Attachments for the sole purpose of aesthetics, sure, not a problem at all. No different than weapon skins in that sense, which I really don’t have a problem with. Gameplay effecting ones? That would probably be where I’d just give up with Halo.
Somewhat OT: Seriously. What was wrong with everyone starting with the same equipment every game? And working to get the gun you want, rather than spawning with something you easily can cross-map with?
Attachments are not a part of Halo and they never should be. The only changes made to weapons should be skins, nothing more.
> > Oh god no. Attachments are for CoD kiddies, leave it there for them. Dont infect Halo with more CoD than it already has.
>
> Is the US army kiddies for using attachments too?
>
> COD didnt come up with the idea, it was merely bringing in real life elements. Why in the future would attachments be no more.
>
> Halo has pretty much nowhere to go but “magic sci-fi powers” if they are trying to avoid anything resembling cod.
>
> I’m not saying I’m for attachments, but I think hating an idea simply because its in COD, especially when it has solid basis in the real world, is just silly.
>
> We’re kind of running out of buttons for new stuff, and attachments would be too radical to add to h4. Maybe h5.
Its a game not a real life simulator. Halo has never had attachments because its assumed that in the future they have no need of attachemnts. Red dot sight, for instance is pointless when you have a HUD built in to your helmet. Extended mags again is pointless when the weapons are designed for interchangability. In other words one magazine to fit them all.
And I dont see the covies putting any attachments on weapons either. So it would completely imbalance the weapon sandbox.
Tell me, Am I right when I say I hear a . . . .
CoD fanboy?
get out.