After also buying star wars battlefront and being blown away by the artistic detail in the game …
realistic invirerments
weather blowing tarps in game !!!
H5 is defffffffff lacking!!!
Def noticed that simular to h5 swb3 is seriously lacking in content at launch!!! It’s clear to me how these -Yoinks!- at the corporate are ripping off the gamers!!! Seems like its just about the money now … I love the gameplay of h5 but the maps look like Nintendo 64
when you point it out like that,
yeah, they do. Except with 60 fps!!
Where you whelmed OVER or UNDER by SW game play?
Battlefront had less than a two year development, so it’s understandable. Not excusable, but understandable.
Halo 5 had a 3 year development, so there’s NO excuse.
Black Ops 3 has realistic visuals, as well, yet it has tons of content.
So moral:
Battlefront proves we can have ultra realistic huge open chaotic sandboxes with a locked 60 fps.
Black Ops 3 proves we can have super nice visuals AND nice content.
Halo 5… Eh, idk what it proves. But it’s there. Lol.
Halo 5 is more pleasing to look at. Battlefront’s graphics are boring. It doesn’t feel like Star Wars either.
> 2533274817343108;5:
> Halo 5 is more pleasing to look at. Battlefront’s graphics are boring. It doesn’t feel like Star Wars either.
Okay, I can agree with BF being lacking, but your lying through your teeth if you are saying it looks boring, because its the best looking game this year.
> 2533274817343108;5:
> Halo 5 is more pleasing to look at. Battlefront’s graphics are boring. It doesn’t feel like Star Wars either.
Troll alert
Halo 5 game engine is a broken piece of crap. Artistic wise it can go up and down in a blink of an eye. lol
> 2533274793616507;7:
> > 2533274817343108;5:
> > Halo 5 is more pleasing to look at. Battlefront’s graphics are boring. It doesn’t feel like Star Wars either.
>
>
> Troll alert
I have to agree actually with your “troll”. I played the beta and it felt terrible. It felt terrible lol.
343 fanboy alert. They are incoming…brace yourselves
I’ll assume you’re talking about the forge maps. I admit that the screenshots didn’t look great, but when you’re on the ground they are fine.
> 2535410009404777;8:
> Halo 5 game engine is a broken piece of crap. Artistic wise it can go up and down in a blink of an eye. lol
What does this mean exactly. The engines great, hasnt broken for me yet, only the draw distance is a little short. What does artisitc wise mean? And the art is very consistent (and imo amazing, whether you think it looks like halo or not), so you must mean graphics, which are agin, very consistent. Is this a troll?
If graphics are this important to you, then The Order 1886 must be a masterpiece.
Wait… You’re saying that Halo 5 has less content than Battlefront? The game with no proper single player and only 4 actual multiplayer maps? And the one that charges 50$ for a season’s pass?
Battlefront is a nice game and all, but let’s be serious here… Halo 5 is the better deal out of both of them when it comes to content, even if it isn’t at the point where it should be.
> 2533274953693601;6:
> > 2533274817343108;5:
> > Halo 5 is more pleasing to look at. Battlefront’s graphics are boring. It doesn’t feel like Star Wars either.
>
>
> Okay, I can agree with BF being lacking, but your lying through your teeth if you are saying it looks boring, because its the best looking game this year.
I played it on maximum settings on PC and was impressed with the fidelity but it still wasn’t satisfying to look at. The aesthetics are boring.
> 2533274793616507;7:
> > 2533274817343108;5:
> > Halo 5 is more pleasing to look at. Battlefront’s graphics are boring. It doesn’t feel like Star Wars either.
>
>
> Troll alert
Calling someone a troll is a lazy effort to shut-down someone you disagree with. It’s nothing more than spam on the forum.
After playing both I would also agree that Halo 5 looks better. Battlefront looks fantastic, but mostly from a distance. Some of the surfaces in Halo aside from the grass on apex look incredibly realistically in the realm of the game.
Forge maps have always looked like crap.
> 2533274791874413;1:
> After also buying star wars battlefront and being blown away by the artistic detail in the game …
> realistic invirerments
> weather blowing tarps in game !!!
> H5 is defffffffff lacking!!!
> Def noticed that simular to h5 swb3 is seriously lacking in content at launch!!! It’s clear to me how these -Yoinks!- at the corporate are ripping off the gamers!!! Seems like its just about the money now … I love the gameplay of h5 but the maps look like Nintendo 64
Have you ever played the Nintendo 64? I watched my brother play Halo 5 and the graphics can’t even be compared to the 64, I don’t know what you’re looking at but it’s not Halo 5 that’s for sure.
> 2533274920092347;12:
> > 2535410009404777;8:
> > Halo 5 game engine is a broken piece of crap. Artistic wise it can go up and down in a blink of an eye. lol
>
>
> What does this mean exactly. The engines great, hasnt broken for me yet, only the draw distance is a little short. What does artisitc wise mean? And the art is very consistent (and imo amazing, whether you think it looks like halo or not), so you must mean graphics, which are agin, very consistent. Is this a troll?
Look for a post named game physics. It will help you understand that it’s a broken game engine. And yes also how the game handles graphics is poor. Unless you want to put the blame solely on the developers? Halo 2 anniversary had a better game engine than this. No popouts, no fuzzy textures, no broken game physics. Characters don’t feel like they could fall apart at any minute. The game engine as a whole is not good period.