Hi everyone! It is jaygreen7 here and I wanted to share some ideas for the Halo 5 CSR system. Your feedback would be very much appreciated. My idea for the ranking system would be that instead of the winning team earning points and the loosing team loosing points, The top three players on the winning team and the top player or the loosing team would earn points while everyone else earns points. This idea would not apply to Team Doubles and FFA. Please, leave any thoughts, comments, or ideas in the comments! Also, I am recruiting for my Spartan Company R3W1ND Inc. Thank you!!!
One more thing. If anybody is interested, I have two other forum posts that I would like some feedback on. They are the “Spartan Ops DLC” and the "New Warzone Modes’ posts.
Why should the team that loses go up in CSR?
You lost. You shouldn’t get rewarded.
> 2533274796457055;3:
> Why should the team that loses go up in CSR?
>
> You lost. You shouldn’t get rewarded.
This. It’s a team based system. No one on the losing team should get credit, and everyone on the winning team should.
> 2535454200407807;1:
> Hi everyone! It is jaygreen7 here and I wanted to share some ideas for the Halo 5 CSR system. Your feedback would be very much appreciated. My idea for the ranking system would be that instead of the winning team earning points and the loosing team loosing points, The top three players on the winning team and the top player or the loosing team would earn points while everyone else earns points. This idea would not apply to Team Doubles and FFA. Please, leave any thoughts, comments, or ideas in the comments! Also, I am recruiting for my Spartan Company R3W1ND Inc. Thank you!!!
Wait why would everyone get points I’m guessing that was a typo I think halo 5s system works fine I think the only problem at least it was the last time I played for ranking was that the placements were confusing my friend who had a slightly better kda and overall stats got a lower gold ranking while I got a higher one even though the only thing I got higher in was assists by about five…
It has it’s merits but it wouldn’t work since the art of selecting matchmaking teams isn’t present in H5.
Giving enough credit to losing teams may help some from quitting games but how much to give to make it worth while? Obviously the penalty of no credit in warzone or loss of CSR in arena and maybe a ban aren’t enough of a deterrence. Maybe giving more RP but not CSR could be an option.
> 2535454200407807;1:
> My idea for the ranking system would be that instead of the winning team earning points and the loosing team loosing points, The top three players on the winning team and the top player or the loosing team would earn points while everyone else earns points.
So basically if I’m on 4th place on the winning team I’m gonna derank and the guy who is first on the losing team would rank up? That makes no sense and will cause frustration on the guy who is last on the winning team.
My team won the match my whole team ranks up and the whole losing team lose rank. That’s it, fair and simple but it’s far from perfect which is for another discussion.
The system needs adjustments, but mostly because the ranking system doesnt work well to begin with
Also don’t bump posts. You coulda easily edited your first post
Problem with team based ranking system is it’s difficult to play with the same people often. I feel like it’s based too much on grinding cause I probally could reach onyx if I grinded for it (at least for people with out a common crew). Daimond was the best I could do solo.
> 2533274796457055;3:
> Why should the team that loses go up in CSR?
>
> You lost. You shouldn’t get rewarded.
so your telling me if I got 35 to 1 in a game and still lose that I deserve to go down in ranks? Not everyone can play with a team and not everyone can have other players as good as them. While yes it is a team based game it is NOT a team based ranking system. Otherwise you wouldn’t be ranked and instead you would get a team rank.
> 2535406578642269;5:
> > 2535454200407807;1:
> > Hi everyone! It is jaygreen7 here and I wanted to share some ideas for the Halo 5 CSR system. Your feedback would be very much appreciated. My idea for the ranking system would be that instead of the winning team earning points and the loosing team loosing points, The top three players on the winning team and the top player or the loosing team would earn points while everyone else earns points. This idea would not apply to Team Doubles and FFA. Please, leave any thoughts, comments, or ideas in the comments! Also, I am recruiting for my Spartan Company R3W1ND Inc. Thank you!!!
>
> Wait why would everyone get points I’m guessing that was a typo I think halo 5s system works fine I think the only problem at least it was the last time I played for ranking was that the placements were confusing my friend who had a slightly better kda and overall stats got a lower gold ranking while I got a higher one even though the only thing I got higher in was assists by about five…
Please I beg you. Use punctuation. Or at least full stops… I understand I can be hard to punctuate on mobile but come on man only a few full stops are needed. Also halos ranking system is broken. On my alt account I versed onyxs almost every doubles game, won 75%, was too of my team every single time, had a 13kda and got ranked plat 1. My teammates that I was way better than were higher than that…
You want to be rewarded for losing?
No.
I’d like to be punished less as a solo queued player that had 5/15 team mates. I beat up most of “winning” team just to lose because team goes horribly negative. Sure I could get a team, find friend, blah blah. But often my friends aren’t online and I’d still like to play ranked.
Csr would be nice if it considered k/d fir losing team.
> 2535415305234137;11:
> > 2533274796457055;3:
> > Why should the team that loses go up in CSR?
> >
> > You lost. You shouldn’t get rewarded.
>
> so your telling me if I got 35 to 1 in a game and still lose that I deserve to go down in ranks? Not everyone can play with a team and not everyone can have other players as good as them. While yes it is a team based game it is NOT a team based ranking system. Otherwise you wouldn’t be ranked and instead you would get a team rank.
Yes. If you want to win, play with a team. Don’t lone wolf it.
> 2533274796457055;15:
> > 2535415305234137;11:
> > > 2533274796457055;3:
> > > Why should the team that loses go up in CSR?
> > >
> > > You lost. You shouldn’t get rewarded.
> >
> > so your telling me if I got 35 to 1 in a game and still lose that I deserve to go down in ranks? Not everyone can play with a team and not everyone can have other players as good as them. While yes it is a team based game it is NOT a team based ranking system. Otherwise you wouldn’t be ranked and instead you would get a team rank.
>
> Yes. If you want to win, play with a team. Don’t lone wolf it.
This is crucial to winning, make sure the team is GOOD.
I am a solo player and yeah I don’t like team based CSR. Sure it wouldn’t be as bad if H5 had a big population and skill based match making would work better. But low population leads to bigger skill level windows so you never know who will be on your team sometimes. I prefer individual performance skill based ranking. The counter argument is this can lead some to not play as a team and go for their personal stats but I would rather have players putting their best into it for stats rather than getting a lower skilled player who may not be good. But I pretty much stick to FFA in H5 ranked playlist. I can’t remember if I ever even bothered to get a rank in any team based playlist, quitters are to rampant in H5. But ALL players on the winning team should gain CSR. As for the losing team maybe have something like the top player or two don’t lose CSR if they did well enough, not sure what the criteria for that would be though.
Edit: I wouldn’t be against say the last place player on the winning team not gaining CSR if they performed poorly, went way negative or whatever.
> 2533274796457055;15:
> > 2535415305234137;11:
> > > 2533274796457055;3:
> > > Why should the team that loses go up in CSR?
> > >
> > > You lost. You shouldn’t get rewarded.
> >
> > so your telling me if I got 35 to 1 in a game and still lose that I deserve to go down in ranks? Not everyone can play with a team and not everyone can have other players as good as them. While yes it is a team based game it is NOT a team based ranking system. Otherwise you wouldn’t be ranked and instead you would get a team rank.
>
> Yes. If you want to win, play with a team. Don’t lone wolf it.
I’m willing to bet that a large portion of players do play solo. The Matchmaking needs to accommodate them better, not punish them for solo play.
As far as the CSR ranking goes I agree that players on losing teams shouldn’t be rewarded, but there should be some consideration of individual performance. Maybe if someone finishes with an 8.0 KDA or something they wouldn’t drop as much in CSR.
This “play on a team or QQ” mindset people seem to have will not help the already diminished Halo player-base.
> 2533274804649077;18:
> > 2533274796457055;15:
> > > 2535415305234137;11:
> > > > 2533274796457055;3:
> > > > Why should the team that loses go up in CSR?
> > > >
> > > > You lost. You shouldn’t get rewarded.
> > >
> > > so your telling me if I got 35 to 1 in a game and still lose that I deserve to go down in ranks? Not everyone can play with a team and not everyone can have other players as good as them. While yes it is a team based game it is NOT a team based ranking system. Otherwise you wouldn’t be ranked and instead you would get a team rank.
> >
> > Yes. If you want to win, play with a team. Don’t lone wolf it.
>
> I’m willing to bet that a large portion of players do play solo. The Matchmaking needs to accommodate them better, not punish them for solo play.
> As far as the CSR ranking goes I agree that players on losing teams shouldn’t be rewarded, but there should be some consideration of individual performance. Maybe if someone finishes with an 8.0 KDA or something they wouldn’t drop as much in CSR.
> This “play on a team or QQ” mindset people seem to have will not help the already diminished Halo player-base.
FFA is perfect if you want to solo Q. When you play a TEAM playlist and are going for solo stats, it hurts the team and screws over everyone in the game.You win or lose as a TEAM. If a guy goes 35-1 but loses because the other team capped 3 flags while his team did none, it’s obvious slaying isn’t enough.
Sorry but I’ll never agree that solo ranking should take priority in the team based modes.
> 2535415305234137;11:
> > 2533274796457055;3:
> > Why should the team that loses go up in CSR?
> >
> > You lost. You shouldn’t get rewarded.
>
> so your telling me if I got 35 to 1 in a game and still lose that I deserve to go down in ranks? Not everyone can play with a team and not everyone can have other players as good as them. While yes it is a team based game it is NOT a team based ranking system. Otherwise you wouldn’t be ranked and instead you would get a team rank.
This…100% this right here. I think it’s completely BS that if you are the best player in a match, that if you loose your rank will still drop. I have had several matches before where I was like 25+ kills and 5 or less deaths but yet my teammates wouldn’t communicate or listen when I would try to tell them where to watch out for enemies and they would just run out there and get killed. In the end, I would be one of the best players that match but because I was stuck with either completely incompetent idiots or just -Yoinks- that just don’t care and want to screw people over…and therefore my rank would go down because of it. While yes, I understand it’s a team-based game that requires teamwork, I feel there should be something done so those that do the best in matches don’t receive negative results because they were put on teams that didn’t work together.
And on a side note, before someone comes along telling me “Just find people to play with and then you will have a team.” Not everyone has friends that play Halo. Like 90% of the people on my Xbox’s friends list either doesn’t have Halo or didn’t like it and don’t play it anymore…and out of those left, the ones that do hardly play anymore since there are more recent games out they play. And I just don’t send/accept random invites from people I meet or game with. If I am on a team with people that don’t communicate in a match…especially if they have a mic and still don’t communicate…I am not gonna friend them or accept any invites.