I always see threads saying everything from weapons, spartan abilities, vehicles, and enemies (basically anything in the game) need to be nerfed. The problem is that Nerfing isn’t the answer to Halo’s problem. If 343 were to Nerf anything, they would be violating their contract with Boomco Blasters, which competes with Nerf as a blaster manufacturer. It is just a simple matter of rephrasing suggestions as “Boomco this” or “Boomco that” to avoid licensing violations. My work here is done.
I did not see that ending coming. You got me on this one:)
> 2533274830700227;1:
> I always see threads saying everything from weapons, spartan abilities, vehicles, and enemies (basically anything in the game) need to be nerfed. The problem is that Nerfing isn’t the answer to Halo’s problem. If 343 were to Nerf anything, they would be violating their contract with Boomco Blasters, which competes with Nerf as a blaster manufacturer. It is just a simple matter of rephrasing suggestions as “Boomco this” or “Boomco that” to avoid licensing violations. My work here is done.
Plot twist: The “Nerf” company has now has trademarked the word “Nerf” and anyone using it in patch notes gets sued.
Just “simple fixes” to these things should make everyone happy, right?
Can they BOOMco. the Grunt Goblin then?
I love this post.
> 2533274838071212;4:
> Can they BOOMco. the Grunt Goblin then?
Of all the enemies 343 have placed into this game, Deacon Pipap and his ilk are the most deserving of a good old fasioned BOOmco’ing. Lord knows those little farts have eaten far too many of my REQs.
Yeah, but doesn’t Hasbro, the company that owns Nerf, always want to remind you that “It’s Nerf or nothing”?
I bet a lot of the people that think weapons need to be nerfed are also the same people that complain about enemies being bullet sponges.