My opinion of the UNSC Wasp

Today i did a test, and the test was to see how many sniper shots the unsc wasp and other air vehicles could take because they got destroyed.
UNSC wasp: 7 shots.
banshee: 7 shots.
phaeton:10 shots.
The unsc wasp is fast how ever it lacks in it weaponry, and it cant hold its self in any combat,the banshee takes the same amount but the banshee can maneuver/flips and it has power full weapons that can kill heavy targets, and dodge the bullets/rockets,the phaeton has a teleport ability to dodge all types of weaponry and it has a fast shooting main weapon with a barrage of explosive projectiles as its secondary, the unsc wasp is fast but it cant hold it self in combat, the other air vehicles will destroy it, realistically the wasp dosnt have a fighting chance. 343 need to make variants of the wast with increased Armor so that can more shots that the banshee but less than a phaeton and the weapon damage needs to be increase. Thank you for looking at this, please comment your opinions.

It’s a req 3 though, shouldn’t it not be super powerful? In my humble opinion, it’s really well balanced, it’s not supposed to be a gunship, but rather a hit and run sort of deal.

As far as I can tell the wasp was meant to be a fast moving support vehicle which main objective was to weaken the enemy as foot soldiers mop up the weakened enemy.

its suppose to be a support vehicle but it cant

The Wasp can be EXTREMELY effective if the pilot is skilled enough. The Wasp also has a shield that can easily stop small amounts of damage.The shield can’t take much damage but you should be trying to dodge incoming projectiles.

Its okay but the armor and armaments need a bit of a buff, just a minor thing because the thing feels like I might as well be riding in a paper airplane.

> 2533274911267611;6:
> Its okay but the armor and armaments need a bit of a buff, just a minor thing because the thing feels like I might as well be riding in a paper airplane.

thank you !!