Personally I prefered the teams of two better like in Halo 3. I like the idea of me and my battle bro going against 3 other teams of spartans more than the cluster f*ck like the 3 man team in Reach.
I think there should be a specific 3v3 playlist like “small squad slayer” or something though.
So ya, discuss. 
Personally, I enjoy the 3 person Multi-team. Get more multi kills that way.
> Personally, I enjoy the 3 person Multi-team. Get more multi kills that way.
I liked the 3 person multi-team on big/open maps.
I didnt like it on small maps like sword base and countdown.
I’d prefer a doubles playlist for 2v2, and multi-team be 3v3.
I prefer 2s
But if its 3’s I will live
> I prefer 2s
> But if its 3’s I will live
Same here, its not that I hated the 3 man teams I just prefered the 2 ya know?
> I’d prefer a doubles playlist for 2v2, and multi-team be 3v3.
But I just dont think the 3 man multi-team has the same feel. It feels almost to hectic, but its not like Ill be super bummed if it stays a 3v3v3v3 playlist
> > I’d prefer a doubles playlist for 2v2, and multi-team be 3v3.
>
> But I just dont think the 3 man multi-team has the same feel. It feels almost to hectic, but its not like Ill be super bummed if it stays a 3v3v3v3 playlist
Doesn’t seem too different to me. I prefer having a variety of team sizes in the playlists. For example:
Lone Wolves - 1
Doubles - 2
Multi-team - 3
Team Slayer - 4
Team Objective - 5
Invasion - 6
BTB - 8
This way pretty much no matter what the party size is there’s a playlist we can fit in without getting randoms.
I’d like to have 2 different multi-teams one that’s 4x2 (played on the small maps) and one that’s 4x4 (played on the BTB maps).
> > > I’d prefer a doubles playlist for 2v2, and multi-team be 3v3.
> >
> > But I just dont think the 3 man multi-team has the same feel. It feels almost to hectic, but its not like Ill be super bummed if it stays a 3v3v3v3 playlist
>
> Doesn’t seem too different to me. I prefer having a variety of team sizes in the playlists. For example:
> Lone Wolves - 1
> Doubles - 2
> Multi-team - 3
> Team Slayer - 4
> Team Objective - 5
> Invasion - 6
> BTB - 8
>
> This way pretty much no matter what the party size is there’s a playlist we can fit in without getting randoms.
I would still like to have just a 3v3 playlist, but I see where your coming from. Hopefully the maps are better suited for a the 3 person multi-team if they have it in though.
As long as it doesn’t have rocket hog race, I’m fine.
> As long as it doesn’t have rocket hog race, I’m fine.
Ya, Rocket Hog Race was neat and all but it got boring pretty fast. I dont know about you but I could play the old Rocket Race all night.
I prefer 2, but both would be nice.
> I prefer 2, but both would be nice.
Both would be nice.
The more diversity the better right?
2 was just so much more fun. it was just you and your battlebro vs the world…no reason to have a 3rd wheel to spoil the fun
> I’d prefer a doubles playlist for 2v2, and multi-team be 3v3.
Yeah, I only play multi-team for the action packed, cluster -Yoink- of carnage that happens on the smaller maps, although, I would probably still play multi-team if it was 2v2.
I miss the maps from Halo 2 that were made for multiteam or 4 play splitscreen. I would like 3v3v3v3 that way you could have 4 team CTF and other objective gametypes. It all depends on the maps. If they don’t seem like they are meant for 4 teams then I really don’t want to play multiteam.
Rocket hog in Halo 4? Then I want 3v3v3v3.
If not, then I want 2v2v2v2 back.
I would prefer teams of 2, specifically 6 teams of 2.
Two reasons:
Multiteam should be teams of 3 because that gives parties of any size a playlist. Single=rumble pit, 2=doubles, 3=multiteam, 4=slayer, 5=objective…