I’m not trying to tell you how to do your job but… If halo 4 lacks the competitiveness of halo 3 I guarantee you halo will die with it. Halo 3 had social for the people that didn’t care if they got beat down every game, so why would you make the whole game social? Doesn’t make sense to me… Anyone who says Halo reach was better than halo 3 obviously isn’t very good at halo. If you disagree here is my GT
GT: ITz DENI3D
> I’m not trying to tell you how to do your job but… If halo 4 lacks the competitiveness of halo 3 I guarantee you halo will die with it. Halo 3 had social for the people that didn’t care if they got beat down every game, so why would you make the whole game social? Doesn’t make sense to me… Anyone who says Halo reach was better than halo 3 obviously isn’t very good at halo. If you disagree here is my GT
>
> GT: ITz DENI3D
I must say, the was a brilliant and well delivered argument against Reach. I must applaud your use of logical reasoning, and your astute insight into the nature of the Halo population and the future of Halo. Bravo!
> > I’m not trying to tell you how to do your job but… If halo 4 lacks the competitiveness of halo 3 I guarantee you halo will die with it. Halo 3 had social for the people that didn’t care if they got beat down every game, so why would you make the whole game social? Doesn’t make sense to me… Anyone who says Halo reach was better than halo 3 obviously isn’t very good at halo. If you disagree here is my GT
> >
> > GT: ITz DENI3D
>
> I must say, the was a brilliant and well delivered argument against Reach. I must applaud your use of logical reasoning, and your astute insight into the nature of the Halo population and the future of Halo. Bravo!
No reason to state why halo reach sucks when it has been explained hundreds of times. Bravo genius. Obviously if you were any good you would know why halo reach sucked and I wouldn’t have to explain it in a long, drawn out post so you can understand.
Toa Freak: 1
MachineAsh: 0
You don’t sound smart. That is all I am going to say.
> > > I’m not trying to tell you how to do your job but… If halo 4 lacks the competitiveness of halo 3 I guarantee you halo will die with it. Halo 3 had social for the people that didn’t care if they got beat down every game, so why would you make the whole game social? Doesn’t make sense to me… Anyone who says Halo reach was better than halo 3 obviously isn’t very good at halo. If you disagree here is my GT
> > >
> > > GT: ITz DENI3D
> >
> > I must say, the was a brilliant and well delivered argument against Reach. I must applaud your use of logical reasoning, and your astute insight into the nature of the Halo population and the future of Halo. Bravo!
>
> No reason to state why halo reach sucks when it has been explained hundreds of times. Bravo genius. Obviously if you were any good you would know why halo reach sucked and I wouldn’t have to explain it in a long, drawn out post so you can understand.
I know of people’s opinions as to why Halo Reach sucks, and I can guess at yours, as well. In the end though, that’s your opinion. Halo 4 will hopefully learn from all the Halo shooters, including Reach, to deliver a fresh Halo title that is both familiar and innovative. Even if Halo 4 were to follow the path Reach took, it would live on, as Reach currently does.
Another point of annoyance for me is your assertion that people enjoy being mismatched against player of greater or less skill. That’s no fun for anyone, be they competitive or casual. Finally, your assertion that your alleged skill makes your opinion more valid than some else’s.
Also, when I read a text from people like you, I wish they were in front of me so I could punch them. I know I sound immature, but I just do wish for that…
> I’m not trying to tell you how to do your job but… If halo 4 lacks the competitiveness of halo 3 I guarantee you halo will die with it. Halo 3 had social for the people that didn’t care if they got beat down every game, so why would you make the whole game social? Doesn’t make sense to me… Anyone who says Halo reach was better than halo 3 obviously isn’t very good at halo. If you disagree here is my GT
>
> GT: ITz DENI3D
Well Halo 3 was not a good competitive game. Only people who started with Halo 3 thinks it is.
I have beaten you multiple times in the MLG playlist also. Your not very good.
Another thing, your logic of if you think Halo Reach is better than Halo 3 is beyond ignorant. Most of the pros actually prefer Halo Reach now that it is no bloom and no sprint than the abomination called Halo 3.
Are you calling them bad?
I don’t think either game is “bad”, I just think each took things a step too far towards extremes. It appears as though 3 and reach both cater to different audiences. The audiences that they cater to, the do a really good job. My hope for “4” is that they can try and cater to both audiences and even more audiences, without alienating the core Halo fans. I’m not suggesting that will be easy, but I believe that is the goal.
> I’m not trying to tell you how to do your job but… If halo 4 lacks the competitiveness of halo 3 I guarantee you halo will die with it. Halo 3 had social for the people that didn’t care if they got beat down every game, so why would you make the whole game social? Doesn’t make sense to me… Anyone who says Halo reach was better than halo 3 obviously isn’t very good at halo. If you disagree here is my GT
>
> GT: ITz DENI3D
Reach is bad? Obviously you think of your opinions as facts. Halo 3 was not perfect either. Both games have ups, and downs. It does not mean that the game itself “sux”.
Halo 3 were the least competitive game in the series in my opinion.
The BR spread in H3 were 7 times worse than Reachs bloom, and the team with the host in Halo 3 allways won.
Halo 3 didn’t even have hit scan.
The current state of the MLG playlist in Reach is close to perfect.
Downsides: OP greanades, Permanent AA, Movement acceleration, Host.
Halo 2 were the most competitive game in the series.
The people who liked H3 the most have most likely never played Halo 2.
Bungie pretty much copied everything from H2 and took away the competitive aspects from the game and filled it with crap.
Thats Halo 3.
R.I.P H2
At this point, I can’t really see this thread going anywhere constructive. Your OP lacks any “arguments” other than “I’m better so I’m right,” which is not how to foster a healthy debate or argument here on the boards.
If you would like to discuss something related to the ranks and/or ranks vs social in Halo 4, I suggest you contribute to this thread.