not too much to say, but…
I think you should have to see this
I think it looks fine.
I also think that the shoulders need to be fixed. As they are right now, they’re a bit too big and wrap around the arm too much. They remind me more of Security armour than Mark V. If they were more like the Halo Anniversary versions, it would be much better!
And yes, the helmet is awful too.
Not a huge fan of the helmet but I do like the body.
They definitely need to go back to something more like Halo: Reach’s style or the original Bungie concept art. I really don’t like what they did with it in CE Anniversary, and this new Halo 5 Mark V set looks even worse. It’s like they pulled it straight out of Halo 1 and then ruined the helmet. The Mark IV we’re getting in a couple days looks more “modern” than this set.
ugly.makes the h4 version shine.
Word around the block is that this ain’t the official Mark V, But the Halo Wars Mark V. There is the idea that the Halo 4/CEA mark V will return. Hopefully.
> 2533274807881644;7:
> Word around the block is that this ain’t the official Mark V, But the Halo Wars Mark V. There is the idea that the Halo 4/CEA mark V will return. Hopefully.
There was no Mark V in Halo Wars.
Looks very toy-ish to me.
But that’s just me.
> 2533274820441404;6:
> ugly.makes the h4 version shine.
The Halo 4 version was the closest to the OG CE version we’ve had. Why’d they change it to this?
Its vent/mouth guard part of the helmet is what’s throwing it off. It looks so… derpy.
the entire jawline is way to “protruding” and those black sun-shields are just clunky and look like they have been added using forge pieces…
H4’s Mk.V wasn’t good either…H3 and HCEA did a great job though
The helmet is pretty ugly
> 2533274801973487;15:
> > 2533274883669557;14:
> > REFERENCE: Combat Evolved
> > wrong: Halo 4
> > joke: Halo 5
>
>
> fixed it for you 
> how about thisor this?
Dood. Halo 4’s is faithful as hell. More so than CEA’s. Chief’s helmet proportions are weird, the leg armor is different, and it’s bulkier than it was originally. The Halo 3 helmet had sharp angles in the visor and no armor to go with it. But thanks for not linking Reach’s.
Not that Halo 3’s and CEA’s versions aren’t -Yoink!- as hell. They are. Reach’s and Halo 5’s are just … offensive. lol. Halo 4’s is the truest to Combat Evolved that we’ve seen … minus the weird handle on the back and the colored undersuit.
> 2533274883669557;16:
> > 2533274801973487;15:
> > > 2533274883669557;14:
> > > REFERENCE: Combat Evolved
> > > wrong: Halo 4
> > > joke: Halo 5
> >
> >
> > fixed it for you
> > how about thisor this?
>
>
> Dood. Halo 4’s is faithful as hell. More so than CEA’s. Chief’s helmet proportions are weird, the leg armor is different, and it’s bulkier than it was originally. The Halo 3 helmet had sharp angles in the visor and no armor to go with it. But thanks for not linking Reach’s.
>
> Not that Halo 3’s and CEA’s versions aren’t -Yoink!- as hell. They are. Reach’s and Halo 5’s are just … offensive. lol. Halo 4’s is the truest to Combat Evolved that we’ve seen … minus the weird handle on the back and the colored undersuit.
H4’s chin area is way too big though…makes it hard to look at it for me
I want Reach’s Mark V armor to make an appearance. 
Eh, helmet looks a bit funny but it’ll grow on me
> 2728966917079826;2:
> I think it looks fine.
I think you need to seek out an Optometrist, bud.