Make it so if you match solo without anyone and there are like 2 people left you and them in ranked arena or if your team mate leaves in team doubles. you dont take any penalty for leaving. specifically if you que up solo
make it so you stay the same rank as you were before the game
No
This is abused in other games to avoid getting a losing match on your record. They would either purposely bully people off or keep people on their team as escape goats.
If you were playing to actually win, you wouldn’t be solo queuing in the first place either. You purposely play with a handicap and you losing a lot more is going to be the consequences to your actions. You don’t get a “get out of jail free card” because your too lazy to find suitable teammates.
Your suppose to taking the game seriously if your playing ranked. Not to mention that it would make ranked a joke if they even considered this in the first place.
we should be able to play for fun and how we want but without penalty just because half of our team+ left. I dont get how it can be abused and how it could be bad. if you solo qued to begin with
especially given when its down to half or less you just hide and waste time away trying to get the round over with
better to just end it
you dont rlly get penalized when you complete the game alone but you do if you leave
This is what social games are for, not ranked. Ranked is for people taking the game seriously, and to win. If your solo queuing for matches, your not taking the game seriously enough, and not playing to win.
The only thing they could consider is giving an option to forfeit the match just to end unwinnable matches quicker. Nothing else.
staying doesnt affect your rank if you lose you dont lose MR so there is honestly no point in making it so you have to stay
I play solo and my teammates almost never leave.
I assume when they do, we would have lost that game had they stayed anyway.
I see nothing against leaving if your teammates have already left, punishedment wise. But you still loss, and you should still be credited a loss. As the other team should be credited for a win.
But picking your teammates yourself will always be the most reliable way to have good teammates. The matchmaker is never going to give you ideal teammates every time, or even most of the time.
What a garbage take. Halo 5 had this feature and it was a non issue. Stop taking videogames seriously to the point where you have to dictate how others play the game.
No, that’s what Social is for. End of story.
People that advocate for quit bans are often garbage at the game because they think they’re entitled to be carried. Quit bans ruin online games. That’s why literally every game today has a smurf problem and people that boost.
I like how this has nothing to do with quit bans that we’re talking about. Where did this even come from? We’re talking about teammates leaving matches nullifing a loss in ranked…
Regardless though, in order for a team oriented game or game type to work, there needs to be some level of sportsman ship and respect towards everyone playing on your team ( hell, even the enemy team ). People who quit because they only care for their own enjoyment of the game and no one elses and joyfully leave because they can add nothing of value to the game, they actually actively hurt it. If people see that it’s ok to just leave whenever they please, then more and more people do it over time. Which means the game will get worse and worse over time because of this for everyone. It’s a very destructive way of thinking that it’s just ok to leave whenever you want just because it’s a game.
I never quit matches. And no, if you’re dragging down the team going negative and don’t even have the decency to play the objective then you don’t deserve respect from anybody. Players like this are the ones going for challenges and shouldn’t be in ranked. Or they’re just drive by Gamepass players. No wonder why there’s so much tk’ing
I’d still rather have a bad teammate then going 3 vs 4 on a team, and being forced to have to play even harder to make up for the fact that I’m down a teammate. I would also respect that player more if he stayed as well. Him leaving doesn’t mean the game is going to be any better for anyone else, that’s a bad assumption.
Mcc does it. Keeping the last 2 players hostage to a loss is not how you retain players. Punish the first 2 not the last half
There does seem to be some hierarchy to the penalty.
The first quitter is punished the hardest. And then later quitters seem to lose less CSR. And those who hold out to the end only lose 3 CSR.
I don’t have a sense of how the game times these decisions?
But I would welcome a H5 type system were you can just end a pointless game. Or at least put in some sort of mercy rule.
Solo/duo playlist says hi
I’m high and not sure if this has been repeatedly proposed, but I can’t really say I’d oppose it either way. It’s abusable, sure, same as any safeguard, but what gets me is that the counterarguments mostly cite what amount to statistical rarities; the majority of the time, the current system just punishes people for being bailed on, and it’s hard to argue in good faith that that’s the preferable state of affairs.
Literally everything any QOL feature is exploitable and this is a fact
how can a solo qued based system be exploited. and people already exploit by smurfing with a low rank to cheese their way up and bombing other peoples ranks who lose against them because the system only seems to care that you lost to a team with 1 low rank not caring about the 3 high ranks