343 sacrificed EVERYTHING for virtually a non-existent change. Nobody cared back in Halo 3 and Reach that we didn’t have that extra special 60fps. This isn’t CoD. Nobody cares that you make already blocky figures look a tad bit more blocky. Bring back 30/45fps and 720p res in exchange for better lighting and more detailed spartans, maps, vehicles, weapons, and more.
Come on you can’t tell me that you can’t see the negative effects of it already in the game.
60fps>30fps
Edit: thanks for all the likes! Anyway I think OP is forgetting that fps has a major impact on gameplay.
so you want halo 6 to use a 12 year old engine? just play quake
60fps for single player, 40fps for split screen. They better -Yoinking!- have split screen.
> 2533274876257384;2:
> 60fps>30fps
No lighting and terrible skins > better lighting and better skins???
60 fps is very beneficial in Halo 5. Gunfights stay consistent and smooth with no dips at all. Even if they sacrificed some things, I’d say the end product still looks beautiful.
At what point in any other Halo was a gunfight inconsistent???
> 2533274878514250;5:
> > 2533274876257384;2:
> > 60fps>30fps
>
>
> No lighting and terrible skins > better lighting and better skins???
good gameplay>less good gameplay.
you have to compare the gameplay not visuals tho
> 2535431623913003;8:
> > 2533274878514250;5:
> > > 2533274876257384;2:
> > > 60fps>30fps
> >
> >
> > No lighting and terrible skins > better lighting and better skins???
>
>
> good gameplay>less good gameplay.
>
> you have to compare the gameplay not visuals tho
what about the gameplay is better? tell me this
> 2533274878514250;9:
> > 2535431623913003;8:
> > > 2533274878514250;5:
> > > > 2533274876257384;2:
> > > > 60fps>30fps
> > >
> > >
> > > No lighting and terrible skins > better lighting and better skins???
> >
> >
> > good gameplay>less good gameplay.
> >
> > you have to compare the gameplay not visuals tho
>
>
> what about the gameplay is better? tell me this
yes it is… it absolutely is… you cant compare 60fps against 30fps in that sense… it is just smoother
I could not go back to playing at 30 fps. Have you tried going back on Reach after playing H5 for so long? It looks like it’s constantly lagging, but it isn’t, it’s just because the frame rate is so low. It’s extremely noticeable.
> 2535431623913003;10:
> > 2533274878514250;9:
> > > 2535431623913003;8:
> > > > 2533274878514250;5:
> > > > > 2533274876257384;2:
> > > > > 60fps>30fps
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > No lighting and terrible skins > better lighting and better skins???
> > >
> > >
> > > good gameplay>less good gameplay.
> > >
> > > you have to compare the gameplay not visuals tho
> >
> >
> > what about the gameplay is better? tell me this
>
>
> yes it is… it absolutely is… you cant compare 60fps against 30fps in that sense… it is just smoother
It really does make a difference. To have your barely better fps and res you sacrifice other things. i.e. splitscreen, better lighting, better visuals, and more things happening, etc.
> 2533274832376620;11:
> I could not go back to playing at 30 fps. Have you tried going back on Reach after playing H5 for so long? It looks like it’s constantly lagging, but it isn’t, it’s just because the frame rate is so low. It’s extremely noticeable.
That’s only on the Xbox One lol I went and played it on the 360 and it felt no different.
> 2533274832376620;11:
> I could not go back to playing at 30 fps. Have you tried going back on Reach after playing H5 for so long? It looks like it’s constantly lagging, but it isn’t, it’s just because the frame rate is so low. It’s extremely noticeable.
he just wants his shiny game with a 2007 framerate…
> 2533274878514250;13:
> > 2533274832376620;11:
> > I could not go back to playing at 30 fps. Have you tried going back on Reach after playing H5 for so long? It looks like it’s constantly lagging, but it isn’t, it’s just because the frame rate is so low. It’s extremely noticeable.
>
>
> That’s only on the Xbox One lol I went and played it on the 360 and it felt no different.
lol u blind
> 2535431623913003;14:
> > 2533274832376620;11:
> > I could not go back to playing at 30 fps. Have you tried going back on Reach after playing H5 for so long? It looks like it’s constantly lagging, but it isn’t, it’s just because the frame rate is so low. It’s extremely noticeable.
>
>
> he just wants his shiny game with a 2007 framerate…
Or perhaps I want my “”""“shiny”"""" game to actually shine.
lol 30fps. I can live with a lower resolution but 60fps is a must for console shooters IMO. PC shooters = 120FPS IMO
> 2533274792998772;17:
> lol 30fps. I can live with a lower resolution but 60fps is a must for console shooters IMO. PC shooters = 120FPS IMO
Yeah but in their stuggle for 60fps they remove splitscreen and, like Call of Duty, they can’t have as much on the screen at once.
> 2533274878514250;16:
> > 2535431623913003;14:
> > > 2533274832376620;11:
> > > I could not go back to playing at 30 fps. Have you tried going back on Reach after playing H5 for so long? It looks like it’s constantly lagging, but it isn’t, it’s just because the frame rate is so low. It’s extremely noticeable.
> >
> >
> > he just wants his shiny game with a 2007 framerate…
>
>
> Or perhaps I want my “”""“shiny”"""" game to actually shine.
play battefront instead… if you dont mind the gameplay
> 2535431623913003;19:
> > 2533274878514250;16:
> > > 2535431623913003;14:
> > > > 2533274832376620;11:
> > > > I could not go back to playing at 30 fps. Have you tried going back on Reach after playing H5 for so long? It looks like it’s constantly lagging, but it isn’t, it’s just because the frame rate is so low. It’s extremely noticeable.
> > >
> > >
> > > he just wants his shiny game with a 2007 framerate…
> >
> >
> > Or perhaps I want my “”""“shiny”"""" game to actually shine.
>
>
> play battefront instead… if you dont mind the gameplay
No thanks.
