The inconsistent moderation is annoying. Anti-??? Threads are locked immediately, yet default supporting threads are still going. ?Why?
Respond how you like, only the following ranks will be responded to:
Superintendent
Monitor
Moderators
Spartan-Iron or higher
> Spartan-Iron or higher
Since when has post count been indicative of post quality?
im not quite sure i understand what your asking, but from my perspective it seems pretty clear.
without even going into details, if default supporting threads exist already and then someone makes an “Anti” thread about the same subject then it is basically duplicating the topic. So it would make sense to lock the anti one to reduce clutter and reallocate all discussion into the support thread.
if your talking about inconsistency with the moderators then it is because each moderator is unique and has different actions regarding the same issue, when an action isnt clear cut by the guidelines of course
> > Spartan-Iron or higher
>
> Since when has post count been indicative of post quality?
'cause post count is the bestest!1111!
On topic. There is always going to be inconsistent moderating when there is more than a single mod. Just deal with it.
Makes thread about how bloom is bad.
Banned.
Thread made about MLG is pong.
lol that’s fine.
Wut.
You don’t get your topic locked for complaining about X feature, it is the way these users are choosing to present it, usually in an obnoxious, rule-breaking way, while the ‘supporters’ tend to not go out of their way to break rules.