But you know, videogames look great even in 30 frames per second. The only time you can really tell the difference is right when you switch between two games, but your eyes get accustomed to it fast, then it looks unnoticeable.
My point? 60 fps was not worth cutting out split-screen, which was a huge part in the beginning of this franchise.
It’s also not worth reducing the graphics, and cutting out all the other features that would have made this game better.
If given the choice between necessary features and 60fps, 60fps doesn’t matter.
> 2533274827215546;1:
> But you know, videogames look great even in 30 frames per second. The only time you can really tell the difference is right when you switch between two games, but your eyes get accustomed to it fast, then it looks unnoticeable.
>
> My point? 60 fps was not worth cutting out split-screen, which was a huge part in the beginning of this franchise.
Split-screen stuff goes here. You can look up human motion perception on your own. 
> 2533274827215546;1:
> But you know, videogames look great even in 30 frames per second. The only time you can really tell the difference is right when you switch between two games, but your eyes get accustomed to it fast, then it looks unnoticeable.
>
> My point? 60 fps was not worth cutting out split-screen, which was a huge part in the beginning of this franchise.
> It’s also not worth reducing the graphics, and cutting out all the other features that would have made this game better.
>
> If given the choice between necessary features and 60fps, 60fps doesn’t matter.
For some, it’s worth it. Some people don’t give a crap about splitscreen and prefer having 60fps.
I see life in 64fps & bits! But please;
> 2533274880633045;2:
> > 2533274827215546;1:
> >
>
> Split-screen stuff goes here.