I think we all agree we want halo 4 to be based off of halo 1 and halo 2. We do not want to see ANYTHING from Reach. No need for arguments here. Just a simple yes or no post is enough. If you agree post yes, disagree post no.
This post has been edited by a moderator. “Yes” and “no” responses are considered spam. Please create threads that encourage discussion.
Yes
I disagree. I dont want to pay for a clone of a game already bought with a new skin. I want innovation, not imitation.
Yes
> I disagree. I dont want to pay for a clone of a game already bought with a new skin. I want innovation, not imitation.
> I disagree. I dont want to pay for a clone of a game already bought with a new skin. I want innovation, not imitation.
He said based off of… not remake
What about halo 3 …? Halo 3 and halo 2 are the really good games, and so is Halo 1, but mostly Nostalgia. With the game reach, they wanted the halo players to gain the feel they got 10 years ago. Halo:Reach is based of Halo 1 but the term ‘‘skill’’ has a much smaller role.
> > I disagree. I dont want to pay for a clone of a game already bought with a new skin. I want innovation, not imitation.
I can read just fine. And don’t kid yourself, we all know that “based off Halo 1/2” means make it play exactly like those games.
No. If I want to play halo 1 or 2, I’ll go play halo 1 or 2. Halo 4 should be revolutionary, not a clone of an old game.
And why did you say you wanted Halo 4 to be like 1 and 2? 1 and 2 are very different. 2 and 3 are far more similar.
> I think we all agree we want halo 4 to be based off of halo 1 and halo 2. We do not want to see ANYTHING from Reach. No need for arguments here. Just a simple yes or no post is enough. If you agree post yes, disagree post no.
No, “WE” don’t all agree “we” want Halo 4 to be based off of Halo 1 and 2.
You don’t want to see ANYTHING from Halo: Read? That means:
No theater.
No Firefight.
None of the Gametypes in the game.
No (more) balanced weapons
No to-date graphics.
No fleshed out customization for settings.
No character customization.
And much more.
erything 343 do, they do it bigg
> erything 343 do, they do it bigg
haha, whaa??
anyways, I’d say a good mix of halo 2/halo 3 styles would be good. Just no bloom, please.
This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not post spam.
You have to admit, Reach did have nice ideas. They had the most customization of any Halo game. Also, brought in new game types like Invasion.
well a halo 1/2/3 mix would be perfect because I would prefer halo 4 not to be a glitch and bad physics fest (like halo 2 and parts of halo1) but all games are great and combining them will make halo 4 perfect but it still should be totaly new and not a copy paste like C.O.D.
Well Reach was based off of Halo 1 with just some stuff added… So you know… That didn’t turn out as well has some fans have hoped.
In plus, at this point everything gameplay-wise will pretty much already be set in stone, not much point demanding that 343i make it more like one game or another.
No.
I think all games had pros and cons.
I would say aspects from halos 1-3 that plus all of the action and in-your-face play style of reach along with the slower combatstyle and exploreation of halo1 in some parts of the campaign. going on that, some unexpected plot-twists twards the end of the campaign,and something absolutely shocking/devastating for the final cutscene that will want you to wish halo5 was released tomorrow morning.
now in my opinion thats a good combination 
N…O… what are you thinking?
Halo 4 should be base on all Halo’s .