Just to add to the Cluster of 'Rank threads'

Games Other Halo
1

Visible ranks are needed, without them this game will be another Reach.2

Why do you not see this 343?? :frowning:

2

> Visible ranks are needed, without them this game will be another Reach.2
>
> Why do you not see this 343?? :frowning:

I remember fighting this fight when halo reach came out. We predicted the games multiplier would be a failure, and it was. And here we are again fighting the same fight, with people saying the same old arguments against halo 2 and halo 3’ ranking system. And again we will fail, but not for lack of trying.

3

KxrrupT - 50

also you do have a VISIBLE rank is called SR1, there you go

4

Edited by Moderator - Please do not post inappropriate comments.

*Original post, click at your own discretion.

343i GFY!

5

It at least should be split into ranked and social playlist, instead of all in one. I’m not going to argue over visible or invisible ranks.

6

This is what happens when 343i though people who liked ranks were 1% of the community.

This game will be good but missing off arena or ranks stops this from being great

7

please stop posting its not going to change anything

8

> > Visible ranks are needed, without them this game will be another Reach.2
> >
> > Why do you not see this 343?? :frowning:
>
> <mark>I remember fighting this fight when halo reach came out. We predicted the games multiplier would be a failure, and it was.</mark> And here we are again fighting the same fight, with people saying the same old arguments against halo 2 and halo 3’ ranking system. And again we will fail, but not for lack of trying.

The reason that Reach’s multiplayer was bad was because the game was poorly balanced, not because of an inaccurate numerical representation of skill. Considering that most of the people who have actually gotten their hands on Halo 4 have said that it plays very well, I’m not concerned about Halo 4’s gameplay.

9

> > Visible ranks are needed, without them this game will be another Reach.2
> >
> > Why do you not see this 343?? :frowning:
>
> I remember fighting this fight when halo reach came out. We predicted the games multiplier would be a failure, and it was. And here we are again fighting the same fight, with people saying the same old arguments against halo 2 and halo 3’ ranking system. And again we will fail, but not for lack of trying.

I predicted Halo reach was gonna be a fail entirely and I was right the balancing issues, the bad campaign AA’s being overpowered in multiplayer the spartans looking generic I went to Halo 3."…oh,…really?..it didn’t have a true skill ranking system?Ha, that was least of it’s problems."

10

You know if I were playing the “Halo 4: Drinking game” (Which I’m Not) I would be on the floor dead with all these post about ranks… but anyways… I’m a little disappointed that there isn’t a visible rank but I really play to have fun…

11

why do so many people act like visable ranks are the only thing that made halo 3 worth palying =/ by ur description halo 3 and 2 mustve sucked if a number was the best part of it… ( i know halo 3 and 2 were great games )

12

I apologize on behalf of all people who want a visible rank. The OP isn’t putting up a reasonable argument. Reach wasn’t all that great in part due to no visible rank but there was a lot more going against it than just that.

13

Because making more threads will get what I want.

14

Intentionally and knowingly creating additional threads is spam.

If you want to discuss it, use one of the many existing threads.