It just seems crazy to me that someone can get 13 less kills than someone and still only be 2 kills worth of points behind them. The game ended with me dueling the 2nd place player and he almost killed me, and my bounty was high enough that he would have won if he did, even though he would have had 12 less kills.
Regicide is fun and all but the scoring seems a little unbalanced. I think the King should get 15 points for each kill, instead of 10. Likewise, the bounty for the king should be constant 20 points, or 2 kills. that way there is incentive to both become the king, as well as kill the king if you aren’t. The bounty getting up to 35 points, or 3.5 kills, is a little ridiculous though.
> You gonna post Regicide specific medals respective to each place? That’d be nice.
well I was the king almost the entire match so obviously I didn’t get too many regicides, lol. I think I had 1 and 2nd place had 6. My post though is more focused around the fact that if you stay king the whole match, you have to outplay the crap out of everyone else to even have a chance to win, which seems unfair in my eyes.
> > You gonna post Regicide specific medals respective to each place? That’d be nice.
>
> well I was the king almost the entire match so obviously I didn’t get too many regicides, lol. I think I had 1 and <mark>2nd place had 6</mark>. My post though is more focused around the fact that if you stay king the whole match, you have to outplay the crap out of everyone else to even have a chance to win, which seems unfair in my eyes.
> > > You gonna post Regicide specific medals respective to each place? That’d be nice.
> >
> > well I was the king almost the entire match so obviously I didn’t get too many regicides, lol. I think I had 1 and <mark>2nd place had 6</mark>. My post though is more focused around the fact that if you stay king the whole match, you have to outplay the crap out of everyone else to even have a chance to win, which seems unfair in my eyes.
>
> Explains everything.
You’re missing the point. I perfectly understand WHY he was so close to beating me. I’m just doubting whether or not the scoring is justified, and questioning why there is no point bonus for the king, which would seem logical since other people can get up to 3.5 kills for killing you once.
I played with this guy on Regicide and nearly everytime he ran into me, I killed him, but somehow he would always instantly respawn somewhere near me and finish me off.
It was really annoying.
The game got tied 290-290 because of that.
Luckily my brother was playing on a guest and this guy was doing the same thing to him, so my bro let me get the final kill off himself
Regicide FFA would be SO MUCH BETTER, if your bounty actually reset every time you died. I’m pretty sure that’s hwo it works in real life too. You know, when you kill someone, you claim the bounty on said person. You don’t get to claim that bounty multiple times what sense is that?
You get bonus’s for being king, just not points. Being King was never about getting special kills. It’s the fame you get for killing the King. You’re the center of attention, you got a 50/50 chance to live. Half the time people are attacking each other and the other half they will go for you. I think it’s just.
> You get bonus’s for being king, just not points. Being King was never about getting special kills. It’s the fame you get for killing the King. You’re the center of attention, you got a 50/50 chance to live. Half the time people are attacking each other and the other half they will go for you. I think it’s just.
You have a big arrow over your head, how is that 50/50?
> You get bonus’s for being king, just not points. Being King was never about getting special kills. It’s the fame you get for killing the King. You’re the center of attention, you got a 50/50 chance to live. Half the time people are attacking each other and the other half they will go for you. I think it’s just.
I get what you’re saying and it sounds good on paper, but the king shouldn’t have to beat someone by 13 kills just to barely squeak out a win.
