just because something changes...

Does not mean it is a good change.

Would it be a good change if a doctor found a cure for cancer and decided arsonic should be added to the mixture?

Would it be a good change if Gas prices went from 4.50 a gallon to 450 a gallon?

No. Point being, a person should not blindly praise something for change because it is heralded as change. Rather, a person should judge whether a change be good or bad.

I hope that ends the “you just hate change!” argument.

huuuurrrrrrr how can you know that this new arsenic cancer cure isnt better until you try it?

ddddddddddddddddddddeeeeeeerrrrrrrpppppppppp

I would not mind paying $450 a gallon for gas either!

Well that was… lame.

I’m sorry OP.

They say they want change, but they embrace CoD. Which means no change. Once Halo has conformed to the mainstream game (CoD) the say games will be re hashed for Halo 5 & 6. The very thing they argue: “We don’t want Halo3.5” for example

> They say they want change, but they embrace CoD. Which means no change. Once Halo has conformed to the mainstream game (CoD) the say games will be re hashed for Halo 5 & 6. The very thing they argue: “We don’t want Halo3.5” for example

Actually, your sentence went from talking about one person to a completely different one. No one here embraces call of duty. If anything, people who don’t want halo to change say they don’t want it like call of duty, but yet, re hashing a game is what you guys say call of duty is all about.

> <mark>They say they want change, but they embrace CoD. Which means no change.</mark> Once Halo has conformed to the mainstream game (CoD) the say games will be re hashed for Halo 5 & 6. The very thing they argue: “We don’t want Halo3.5” for example

Hard to say if that will be the case with Halo and what it does with everything it has on the table.

OP is somewhat right, all change is not good change. Changes made to core mechanics of the series has to complement the experience, not completely change it.

It also doesn’t mean that the changes are bad, i hope that ends your “classic halo”
agrument.

> Does not mean it is a good change.
>
> Would it be a good change if a doctor found a cure for cancer and decided arsonic should be added to the mixture?
>
> Would it be a good change if Gas prices went from 4.50 a gallon to 450 a gallon?
>
>
>
> No. Point being, a person should not blindly praise something for change because it is heralded as change. Rather, a person should judge whether a change be good or bad.
>
>
> I hope that ends the “you just hate change!” argument.

Aww man you got rush limbaugh in my halo!

True. Just because there’s change, doesn’t make it good.

> Does not mean it is a bad change.
>
> Would it be a bad change if a doctor found a cure for cancer that included aresenic and decided arsonic should be removed from the mixture?
>
> Would it be a bad change if Gas prices went from 4.50 a gallon to 1.09 a gallon?
>
>
>
> No. Point being, a person should not blindly hate something that’s been changed just because it is heralded as change. Rather, a person should judge whether a change be good or bad.
>
>
> I hope that ends the “you just like change!” argument.

Really though, I don’t see anyone blindly praising or hating change. I’m willing to bet that most of us are basing our opinions on the Halo games we’ve played in the past and the proposed changes mentioned in the GI article.