Honestly I am not buying H6 at launch and i hope most of you are with me on this because all of this is utter -Yoink- and you can’t deny it, if you want to defend 343 go back and watch angry joes, review and act man to remind how bad everything is.
I love halo, If you guys (343) want to take a different approach to the universe/characters (like halo 4) then do it, but dont have some cliche writing, horrible boring campaign structure/gameplay. And REMOVER SPARTAN BASH IT BREAKS HALO GAMEPLAY.
Look the whole Plot line for your new halo was cool, Eg. The didact, gease, iso didact, librarian. But freaking do it right, and dont freaking ignore the universe. and you always have to keep adding world building/world characterization. wtf were the aliens doing in h4, and h5 they had no purpose. except for mindless revenge. that it one of the stupidest plot line for anything ever if you don’t give them characterization. and Prometheans are boring, since they are somewhat fragmented beings make them a little “broken/crazy” in nature or something.
Us fans have been saying the right things over and over so i hope you are listening, Don’t listen to anyone who says “oh h5 was like h2 you’ll like it later”
No i wont, because H5 Added NOTHING new and, it took away, and the writing pretty bad, characters were so horrible,
H2 added to the universe, using the arbiter as the gateway, and even giving consequences to him to humanize him thus relate able (becoming the arbiter)
So NO LOCKE IS NOT LIKE THE ARBITER, SCREW LOCKE. and screw the writing.
If you guys are really halo fans then plz remember why you became a fan in the first place. Remember those things and show “respect” to them in the newer games, You can add new things and change things to what you want but, they should really be based off of those things that made halo the amazing franchise that is/was
That comment was all over the place. Other than “Writing sucks”, I could barely tell what you were arguing.
But I love how you bring up Angry Joe’s review. That was the most uninformed review I’ve ever seen.
Side note, people did complain about Halo 2’s story and the direction Halo was going, especially the multiplayer.
I wish they would have brought more emotion in the campaign, like when Chief asks Cortana how many died when she summoned the Guardian at Meridian. Then he says she knows the exact body count.
That was an interesting thing to say!!
I want more dark things brought up, like the fact the promethians are composed humans… or Jul M dama taunting the Arbiter for betraying his own kind (if he wasn’t killed off), or Buck remorsing over the deaths of his past odst brothers, or Locke having an inner struggle to do what’s right or follow orders.
Stuff like this!!
> 2533274833081329;2:
> That comment was all over the place. Other than “Writing sucks”, I could barely tell what you were arguing.
>
> But I love how you bring up Angry Joe’s review. That was the most uninformed review I’ve ever seen.
>
> Side note, people did complain about Halo 2’s story and the direction Halo was going, especially the multiplayer.
It was simply a reminder. that mostly everything done in h5 was complete garbage. are you really one of those people. . .
I referenced angry joe as the "casual/semi hardcore prespective Which TONS of people have the same opinions. Maybe some points were off but most of it was true you cant deny that. do you really base videos you watch on the smallest knitpicks?
Then i referenced act man who is more invested in the halo franchise.
Uhh yeah, i just basically said i knew that. Except again. the story added characterization to the world and enemy/villain. and it was more impactful because no one was actually “evil” prophets believed it was true, The covenant races were being swayed, I mean there was inter conflict everywhere. thats way better writing then h5 and decent at the least.
And i said the maps/ “level design sorry” were uncreative. i mean how can what i said not be more straight forward enough?
> 2533274833569045;3:
> I wish they would have brought more emotion in the campaign, like when Chief asks Cortana how many died when she summoned the Guardian at Meridian. Then he says she knows the exact body count.
>
> That was an interesting thing to say!!
>
> I want more dark things brought up, like the fact the promethians are composed humans… or Jul M dama taunting the Arbiter for betraying his own kind (if he wasn’t killed off), or Buck remorsing over the deaths of his past odst brothers, or Locke having an inner struggle to do what’s right or follow orders.
>
> Stuff like this!!
Yes dude awesome ideas. sad about Jul too, that would have been an awesome conflict to see.
See we need some creativity up in this game
> 2533274817770579;4:
> > 2533274833081329;2:
> > That comment was all over the place. Other than “Writing sucks”, I could barely tell what you were arguing.
> >
> > But I love how you bring up Angry Joe’s review. That was the most uninformed review I’ve ever seen.
> >
> > Side note, people did complain about Halo 2’s story and the direction Halo was going, especially the multiplayer.
>
>
> It was simply a reminder. that mostly everything done in h5 was complete garbage. are you really one of those people. . .
> I referenced angry joe as the "casual/semi hardcore prespective Which TONS of people have the same opinions. Maybe some points were off but most of it was true you cant deny that. do you really base videos you watch on the smallest knitpicks?
> Then i referenced act man who obviously is more invested in the halo franchise.
>
> Uhh yeah, i just basically said i knew that. Except again. the story added characterization to the world and enemy/villain. and it was more impactful because no one was actually “evil” prophets believed it was true, The covenant races were being swayed, I mean there was inter conflict everywhere. thats way better writing then h5 and decent at the least.
I’m not one who blindly defends Halo 5 if that’s what you’re saying. I know Halo 5 has problems, but I just give credit where credit is due (which I haven’t even done here).
No, I just expect Angry Joe to actually research the video games he play before he reviews them, especially if he’s “been with the game since CE”. He didn’t know about the Splitscreen problem until after he bought the game, and then bought a second XB1 anyway. Some of his stuff in that review are just pure bias, if not a blatant lie.
I didn’t talk about the Act Man because I don’t watch his videos.
I never said Halo 2 was bad. I just said people didn’t like it’s direction. Even I don’t like the fact how the humans did very little to impact the story up until removing the Index from the ring at the very end of the game.
No character progression whatsoever. Chief stays an emotionless soldier, Locke just keeps following orders, Buck stays sarcastic. The only character that had changed was Cortana, but she didn’t have an inner change, only our perspective of her changed.
oh. well i stopped playing halo campaign after halo 3. hasnt been one worth playing since