I’m going to going to get insulted for this but its the truth…
Me and my friend that I have been playing halo with from the start have came to a very good conclusion… Halo Reach has no reason to be hated on… It was a great game… Sure there were problems with it but what game doesn’t have problems… It was balanced out even with the aa’s… Jet pack was balanced. How was isn’t? It doesn’t help you kill people it just makes you go higher… Sprint was balanced out… It helped you avoid problems that you could run into, like running into the whole team were you could be out numbered… Armor wasn’t over powered the more I think about it. There was an easy to get around it… Invisibitly wasn’t unbalanced… It just made it harder to find someone which is a good challenge… The only thing that was a huge piss off to me was the grenades… Im sure that could be easily fixed… No one likes the dmr because of the bloom… There is nothing wrong with bloom… It just takes more patient and skill instead of pushing the button as fast you can and have 100% accuracy unless the person is moving around. The reason people hated reach was because it was a harder game. Armor abilities prevented deaths…
If halo 4 has all those things in it again… I would honestly not have a problem with it. I’m excited to see how armor enhancements work and excited for this game. I just ask for the love of god for halo 4 to have better grenades… Hate on me all you want but this is a true statement…
> . The reason people hated reach was because it was a harder game.
No, Halo Reach was not harder, just far more random and unbalanced. Also, just because some thing is tougher doesn’t mean its better. If chess were to be made tough by allowing one person’s queen to kill the other person’s pieces in one move, would that be a change for the better?
> > . The reason people hated reach was because it was a harder game.
>
> No, Halo Reach was not harder, just far more random and unbalanced. Also, just because some thing is tougher doesn’t mean its better. If chess were to be made tough by allowing one person’s queen to kill the other person’s pieces in one move, would that be a change for the better?
nothing was unbalanced about the game… I honestly use to think all the aa’s were unbalanced but they weren’t… There were always to counter aa’s and yes reach was harder and that’s why everyone hated because there were ways of avoiding deaths. Why do you think cod is so popular? Its because its easier to kill someone and that part of the game has never changed…
> > > . The reason people hated reach was because it was a harder game.
> >
> > No, Halo Reach was not harder, just far more random and unbalanced. Also, just because some thing is tougher doesn’t mean its better. If chess were to be made tough by allowing one person’s queen to kill the other person’s pieces in one move, would that be a change for the better?
>
> nothing was unbalanced about the game… I honestly use to think all the aa’s were unbalanced but they weren’t… There were always to counter aa’s and yes reach was harder and that’s why everyone hated because there were ways of avoiding deaths. Why do you think cod is so popular? Its because its easier to kill someone and that part of the game has never changed…
Have you been sniffing glue or something?
Reach is horrible. The AA’s are unbalanced, the story is garbage, the multiplayer is abysmal and half of the maps are in the story.
It’s fine and dandy with you coming on here and saying that you know Reach is fine but that’s not the case. Everyone with a brain on this and any other Halo related site knows that Halo Reach got the worst reception from fans out of all the Halo’s and that isn’t heresay, that’s cold hard facts.
> > > > . The reason people hated reach was because it was a harder game.
> > >
> > > No, Halo Reach was not harder, just far more random and unbalanced. Also, just because some thing is tougher doesn’t mean its better. If chess were to be made tough by allowing one person’s queen to kill the other person’s pieces in one move, would that be a change for the better?
> >
> > nothing was unbalanced about the game… I honestly use to think all the aa’s were unbalanced but they weren’t… There were always to counter aa’s and yes reach was harder and that’s why everyone hated because there were ways of avoiding deaths. Why do you think cod is so popular? Its because its easier to kill someone and that part of the game has never changed…
>
> Have you been sniffing glue or something?
>
> Reach is horrible. The AA’s are unbalanced, the story is garbage, the multiplayer is abysmal and half of the maps are in the story.
>
> It’s fine and dandy with you coming on here and saying that you know Reach is fine but that’s not the case. Everyone with a brain on this and any other Halo related site knows that Halo Reach got the worst reception from fans out of all the Halo’s and that isn’t heresay, that’s cold hard facts.
Ya it wasn’t the best game but it was still a decent game…