Star Wars and need for speed are very good looking games. Do you think halo 5 matches up just in graphic department.
I haven’t played NFS but when I first saw Star Wars I said “Wow.” I never said that about Halo. Unfortunately the graphics are the only thing SW:BF has going for it in my opinion.
Mario Galaxy looked fantastic and it was just for the wii
Wouldn’t say it’s the prettiest game, but you can’t go back from 60 fps, and the game is certainly inspired in many areas unlike the vast majority of other games.
Halo 5 is beyond gorgeous 
I think the graphics are fine unless you look real close at the fine details. Unless your being nitpicky and specifically looking at the graphics, I think the game looks great but if you pay attention, sometimes the graphics drop to accommodate for factors like when too much is going in at once in a game of warzone.
Need for speed is the nicest looking racing game to date better than driveclub. If you have a chance im not asking you to buy it buy try it out somehow and see for Urself. I feel like it’s the only game that didn’t lie about how it looked when they showed it off. It’s incredible.
i didnt find the graphics compelling for star wars, or halo to be honest.
No. When Halo CE came out, THAT was one of the best looking games at the time. When Halo 2 came out, everyone was like “HOLY CRAP THESE GRAPHICS ARE SO AMAZING.” When Halo 3 came out, it was amazing. Playing through the campaign, you just wanted to look around at the scenery. Even when Halo 4 came out, I was pretty blown away.
With Halo 5, it is really unimpressive. I mean, just look at Star Wars Battlefront. The environments LITERALLY look real. Look at Need For Speed. Heck, even look at Black Ops 3. These games have a realistic feel. And yes, they also run at 60 fps.
Don’t get me wrong, Halo 5 doesn’t look bad. But I’ve seen better graphics on the 360. Seriously. And I remember when 343i was boasting a while about how Halo 5 would be so amazing and realistic. Ha.
Of the first person shooters out right now, I would say Halo 5 has the best graphics. When I first loaded up the first level in campaign, I was just amazed at how good it was. Second by a fairly small margin I would say is battlefront. Which I’ve said many times looks fantastic but lacks some of the finer detail Halo 5 has in at least its single player levels. We are all entitled to our opinions, but I would say its at least top 3. Which is nice for the xbox one.
its smooth and colorful but feels more like CE
everything is blocky and minimal textures
so visually art wise it is average
the 60FPS on the console needs that to maintain framerate so i guess it is a good compromise
Destiny on the other hand feels clunky and slow even though the textures and backgrounds are more detailed
> 2533274793616507;9:
> Don’t get me wrong, Halo 5 doesn’t look bad. But I’ve seen better graphics on the 360. Seriously. And I remember when 343i was boasting a while about how Halo 5 would be so amazing and realistic. Ha.
well the cutscenes anyways
I would say no. It’s graphics aren’t much better than H4 on the 360 really. Sure they are good but other games are way better. But I play Halo for its gameplay. Game play trumps graphics IMO.
HALO 5 campaign looks amazing if you consider (dynamic) 1080p and rock solid 60FPS. HALO 5 has also very high detailed character models and very high modeled weapon models. There is also lots of going on the scene. Lots of vehicles, enemies and large alien space ships with cool animations.
If you look at Star Wars Battlefront it looks very cool on the first time. But many things are just static. You have lots of Bitmap space ships on the sky and maybe one real Tie Fighter sometimes fly around you just as alibi. In HALO 5 you have lots of real 3D modeled space ships flying around you.
The only thing I have to complain about is the graphics of lots MP maps. There are very beautiful maps like Fathom, Escape from A.R.C., but lots of maps looks underwhelming.
No.
The framerate drops for campaign enemies is very jarring and noticeable.
You Are talking about animation framerate of enemis thats that can drop to 30FPS. This is something completely different and only affects visual appearance. I am talking about the output framerate of the game. And this is rock solid without slowdowns.
Going from H5 to Rainbox 6: Siege beta is a night and day difference in terms of framerate. It’s painful trying to play it immediately after Halo 5.
> 2533274800273892;1:
> Star Wars and need for speed are very good looking games. Do you think halo 5 matches up just in graphic department.
Personally I feel Halo 5 can’t even compare to those games graphics wise. 5 may run at 60fps but has virtually no detail and the utter lack of textures on most multiplayer maps among other things makes even Halo 2 classic look better in my personal opinion from a graphics perspective.
No
Halo 4’s graphics were better than 5. We saw leaves falling in Halo 4 from trees!!!