Invasion Slayer: Good or Bad?

Ok, this is my first post on here, so I would like to say Hi, but anyways we should have a debate on this game type. These are some things I found:

FOR INV SLAYER: Invasion Slayer gives you a wider choice of maps to play on. Like Skirmish it gives you reinforcements which are

TIER 1: Spartans- Weapons Elites- Weapons
TIER 2: Spartans- Weapons,Warthog Elites-Weapons,Ghost,Banshee
TIER 3: Spartans- Weapons,Warthog,Scorpion Elites-Weapons,Ghost,Banshee,Wraith

AGAINST INV SLAYER: Invasion Slayer abuses the way people can use their tactics. The reinforcements are killing people one by one and that should not happen.Another reason is that maps are too wide to get to the reinforcements. It can cross-map at any time.

Then add your conclusion, which is

FOR EXAMPLE: I will have to go ________ Invasion Slayer. It is ___________________, and __________________. So my final thoughts are _______________.

If you feel like another debate, comment on this subject or PM me.

Personally, I’d rather all gametypes removed from invasion excluding invasion itself. It seems like invasion slayer, etc. were included to make up for the lack of invasion maps included with the game.

Breakpoint doesn’t really count (as much as I’d like it to) because the likelihood that one person in your game doesn’t have the DLC (it only takes one person to put breakpoint out of the picture) is too high.

I’d like to see some community-made invasion maps chucked into the mix, although I think the reason they haven’t been implemented yet is because they’re kind of glitchy. I think highlands would make a great, linear invasion map, despite the fact that it’s DLC and I’ve sort of gone and contradicted my previous point.

TL;DR: MOAR INVASION, LESS [OTHER GAMETYPES]