Then you need to work on your reading comprehension. I referred to the community on the whole and explained the current situation, never once commenting on how I personally feel about it.
Also, there’s a ton of constructive criticism. But I can’t help it if you choose to click on and read and comment on topics that are clearly not part of those (you can tell from the title) because deep down, you love the drama and want to be part of it. Or else why are you here slinging your crap?
If you want to see the constructive criticisms, go to those topics and keep them bumped instead of wasting your efforts here. People feel bad and they’re gonna make that clear.
There’s literally constructive criticism in this very thread. There’s actually TONS of threads in this forum with constructive, actionable feedback. The point of this post is that that seems like it’s actually ignored far too often.
I agree that some folks take it too far in an unproductive and toxic way. But to act like nobody is being constructive is just patently untrue. And still, this constructive feedback is only selectively addressed- some subjects that definitely have gotten neigh-endless constructive criticism (like customization) are outright ignored in the response by 343.
Basically anything which they haven’t figured out how to change without affecting exorbitant profit margins in any way hasn’t been addressed. At least that’s the way it seems to me, and it’s the most logical conclusion (to me at least) until they give us some kind of rationale to think otherwise.
You can ignore redacted . Hes in every negative thread or feedback thread just bootlicking. Its all he does. For him feedback is harrassment of the high and mighty devs who can do no wrong.
What I said was there is constructive criticism in this thread and others. Just because you found something you don’t find constructive doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist within this community. My point is that denying the existence of constructive criticism in this context just unnecessarily adds to the problem.
There is constructive criticism in the original post though.
At the very least, if someone is gonna be directly critical of folks’ criticism not being constructive: be constructive yourself in that criticism, right?
I don’t agree with everything OP said, but I’m not going to talk down to them for that, or pretend like there was nothing worthwhile or constructive in what they spent time typing out.
Honestly can we just go back to calling them 343 guilty spark industries like bungie used to call them. 343 wanted to work on halo 1. why didnt they? because of these ideas. That’s why bungie named the Oracle 343 guilty spark because they are guilty of atrocities to the community.
Of course they only really care about the battle pass progression, because it makes them money. A real progression system doesn’t make them money, more modes doesn’t make them money, battle passes and overpriced cosmetics make them money. I am sick of game companies actively choosing the free to play model and then turning around acting like we the players have to then be a charity to them. We will support it if we feel we are not being exploited and are given a product that meets certain standards. While Infinite plays incredibly well, it falls short in many other ways.
There’s no progression system (I will say this until they finally get a clue), the cosmetics are overpriced and the lack of modes and specific playlists are such obvious problems.
Really? I thought 343i was formed from Bungie defectors near the end of Bungie Halo’s lifetime and then hired a bunch of anti-halo peeps, named for Guilty Spark, not that an aspect of Halo was created because of them.