The more I think about it, the better it sounds.
What I have in mind is this: ODST drop in drop pods from a frigate above a planet (it could change each season.) Halo 5s weapon system set up the PERFECT weapons for battle Royale. I’m not sure what would be used for armor as overshields don’t really make sense. Maybe armor plates.
It would be incredibly wise to add Battle Royale…
to everyone saying that it would sacrifice Halo’s gameplay signature, that’s a load of BS.
just like Warzone, it’ll be just another playlist.
if call of duty can implement it, then halo can.
and for those speaking about creating your own trend, that’s all well and good,
but to MASTER something, you have to build from a place people are already at… and this is BATTLE ROYALE.
Literally a month ago Apex Legends won multiplayer game of the year…
so please @Halo Admins
revive this franchise.
the halo veterans are sick of seeing the popularity of this game diminishing.
competitive nature is great, but we need balance.
no one wants to play halo anymore.
and there’s virtually no attraction for NEW players to play.
please tune in
Absolutely NOT!!! That would just take away from what made halo famous halo should not follow the current trend and focus on improving warzone war zone on halo 5 is really underrated I love the concept of it its something different and fresh
> 2592250499819446;200:
> > 2535421570132842;196:
> > > 2592250499819446;191:
> > > > 2535421570132842;190:
> > > > > 2592250499819446;185:
> > > > > > 2535421570132842;184:
> > > > > > > 2592250499819446;179:
> > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;165:
> > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;160:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;155:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;154:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;153:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;152:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;149:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;145:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;143:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can’t be bothered with this you can’t tell me what the director says is wrong when he’s the one in charge of making halo, they have stated that they will always treat it as a game mode rather than a stand alone game which you cannot grasp so if you seriously can’t take the truth then I cannot be held responsible for your ignorance and if you knew that much about halo you would understand that activision was directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes I don’t know how you don’t know this information?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I know what Frank said. It’s my opinion that a stand alone Halo would be better, that’s what you cannot seem to grasp. It’s also my hope that they do make a stand alone, changes can be made and game studios change too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Please link where Activision was involved with Halo 4 and 5.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I can grasp it you just don’t understand it as I’m not talking about your “opinion” im talking about fact, also Let me try and explained the Reason activision is involved, activision was in charge on Bungie the original creators of halo but due to the changes activision wanted to incorporate Bungie split from the company and activision put 343 in charge making the whole dilemma activisions fault.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You’re not talking about facts. You’re stating your opinions as facts. Again, you’re of the opinion Activision was involved with Halo, please link where Activision were directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. It did not happen, Activision have never been involved with Halo.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The part about destiny isn’t relevant Bungie splits with Activision, keeps control of Destiny | PC Gamer also can you stop with “YoUr PoStInG YoUr OpiNionS As FaCt” I’m giving information about the game I don’t care much for battle royal but you cannot seem to grasp that they won’t be making a stand alone game but they may make a gamemode. And if you don’t understand that information than there’s nothing I can do to help you.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You’re giving wrong information of the game. Activision has never had anything to do with Halo, not in any way, shape or form, and the part about Destiny is the most relevant thing about it. It’s about Destiny and Activision, NOT Halo and Activision. Also, other forum users have told you the same thing. Again I’ll ask, please link where Activision were directly involved in Halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. What you linked has nothing to do with Activision and Halo. I already stated I don’t care whether it’s a stand alone or add on. If they make a Halo Battle Royale I think a stand alone would be better. The parts about Battle Royale are my opinions, the part about Activision not being involved with Halo is a fact.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It does not prove your point in any way. Bungie and Microsoft had parted ways long before Activision were on the scene. Activision have done nothing to Halo, and you also stated they were directly involved with Halo, they were not. All you’re trying to do is back up your opinion with false info. Back on topic…
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale mode. However, there are players that would like Battle Royale. It’s my hope that they make one in the future. If they make it, I’m not bothered how they do it, either add on or stand alone, but it’s my opinion a stand alone would be better. 1) Players that don’t like it can avoid it. 2) It does not affect another title by replacing another mode. 3) They can dedicate full recources to that game.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LAlso I agree that a battle royal would be fun but I disagree with the fact that you can just ignore the game if you don’t like it as it would have to fit in story wise and make sense in the lore otherwise it’s just a game that looks like halo with different gameplay mechanics
> > > > >
> > > > > You can just ignore it if you don’t like Battle Royale. I already stated I don’t like RTS games like Halo Wars. I’ll admit I bought the first Halo Wars, but I never completed it and I ignored Halo Wars 2 because of the type of game it is. Halo Wars 2 is exactly what you describe, it’s a game that looks like Halo with different gameplay mechanics. It also was made to fit the lore and it can be ignored, I pass on all RTS games. There is no reason a Halo Battle Royale cannot be made to fit the lore too.
> > > >
> > > > I agree with you about halo wars but you have to at least understand to lore behind the game, this is why I think ODST would work best as they have so much potential atm which could possibly make a battle royal as they make sense in the lore to do something like this but in a training simulation that it. Spartans not so much at the moment as the enhanced mobility given to them in halo 5 would completely ruin gameplay as it would be a matter of who Spartan charges first or ground slams you get the idea. I would be ok with a battle royal existing as long as it doesn’t take away from the main games, doesn’t have a battle pass system and makes sense in the lore.
> > >
> > > Fair points. However you’re thinking of Spartans as they are in Halo 5. How about a Battle Royale with teams of MK 2 against MK 1, or ODST training against Spartans, or a solo Spartan guarding a sniper or other rare weapons ? There are so many different ways it could work. As for lore, I already said it could be made to fit the lore. Also you say Spartans with enhanced mobility would ruin it ? I would love that, 100 Spartans dropping with a base loadout of magnum and assault rifle with rare weapons randomly on the map and being able to run at up to 55 kph or more ? Bring it on, in my opinion that would be fantastic.
> >
> > I mean the thruster packs and Spartan charges as those abilities would annihilate anybody unsuspecting, Spartans in the other halos would be ok but I still think it makes more sense with ODST as they are the only ones in the lore to drop out of pods as often as they do.
>
> For sure. I’m in agreement that ODST are the only ones that use drop pods, but I also remember Master Chief escaping the Pillar of Autumn on an escape pod in Halo Combat Evolved, there’s another possibility. Spartans could be dropped in fleets of Pelicans, I’m sure Warzone starts like that, I only played a little on release and stopped so I’m not 100%. Then there’s the drop pods that fit in the Pelicans. There are so many possibilities.
>
> Edit. Sorry mods, messed up my quotes.
That would make sense as a battle royal but it would have to elaborate on the fact that it is a simulation like maybe having the Spartans go into a vr or something similar before hand so that players understand what’s going on, if a battle royal does happen despite what frank said I hope they don’t implement any battle pass systems as that just decides the fan base and annoys players
> 2533274855353246;1:
> I would like a halo battle royale plz.
I want Halo to set a new trend, not follow overused ones or put new twists on overrated ones. With a nice custom browser and forge a Halo BR experience could be had easily.
> 2533274857642512;205:
> > 2533274855353246;1:
> > I would like a halo battle royale plz.
>
> I want Halo to set a new trend, not follow overused ones or put new twists on overrated ones. With a nice custom browser and forge a Halo BR experience could be had easily.
Over used and overrated is purely subjective to you.
Facts show that Battle Royale game modes are top and trending. Opinions aside.
and I agree with creating new trends,
but like every profession, you meet the market where it is, (battle Royale) and then innovate from there. That’s how things evolve.
- it’s like building blocks, this needs to be honored.
(you can’t build a 3rd floor without the 2nd floor)
and yes, those features would be great,
so why not have them all?
i don’t think it’s a matter of if we can ONLY have this or ONLY have that, considering that Halo 5 had over $100 million invested to its development with over a $5 Billion return.
with these numbers, it can easily be justified to multiply the investment numbers.
and before we shoot off too far out to the left field, no other Halo has sold more than Halo 3.
this began with the “innovative” changes you are referring to with halo reach and halo 4. Clearly hurting the franchise.
change is great, but again, where the market is, NEEDS to be honored.
> 2533274951671497;203:
> Absolutely NOT!!! That would just take away from what made halo famous halo should not follow the current trend and focus on improving warzone war zone on halo 5 is really underrated I love the concept of it its something different and fresh
You must not have read the previous posts,
and remember, resources are not a problem.
they could do Battle Royale AND Warzone.
you do realize that Halo 5 had a 50X return in profits right?
money and a development team is not an issue
no thanks
Don’t make the whole game a battle royale, just make it a game mode.
I do not want battle royale in Halo Infinite for one major reason. It will most likely take away from the rest of the game. Fortnite’s story mode is a joke because battle royale is I constantly pandered to. Black Ops 4’s multiplayer was a complete failure because they focused on battle royale. Modern Warfare has always been a mess in my opinion, and the devs fail to ever patch issues in the actual small scale multiplayer and spec ops, but Warzone battle Royale seems to get plenty of attention.
Now would it be possible for 343 to balance both standard arena gameplay, having a good campaign, forge and battle royale? Of course, but given their track record with past Halo games I think they need to focus on core Halo gameplay because quite frankly a lot of Halo fans are skeptical enough given their past performance.
> 2535421570132842;204:
> > 2592250499819446;200:
> > > 2535421570132842;196:
> > > > 2592250499819446;191:
> > > > > 2535421570132842;190:
> > > > > > 2592250499819446;185:
> > > > > > > 2535421570132842;184:
> > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;179:
> > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;165:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;160:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;155:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;154:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;153:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;152:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;149:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;145:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;143:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can’t be bothered with this you can’t tell me what the director says is wrong when he’s the one in charge of making halo, they have stated that they will always treat it as a game mode rather than a stand alone game which you cannot grasp so if you seriously can’t take the truth then I cannot be held responsible for your ignorance and if you knew that much about halo you would understand that activision was directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes I don’t know how you don’t know this information?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know what Frank said. It’s my opinion that a stand alone Halo would be better, that’s what you cannot seem to grasp. It’s also my hope that they do make a stand alone, changes can be made and game studios change too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please link where Activision was involved with Halo 4 and 5.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I can grasp it you just don’t understand it as I’m not talking about your “opinion” im talking about fact, also Let me try and explained the Reason activision is involved, activision was in charge on Bungie the original creators of halo but due to the changes activision wanted to incorporate Bungie split from the company and activision put 343 in charge making the whole dilemma activisions fault.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You’re not talking about facts. You’re stating your opinions as facts. Again, you’re of the opinion Activision was involved with Halo, please link where Activision were directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. It did not happen, Activision have never been involved with Halo.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The part about destiny isn’t relevant Bungie splits with Activision, keeps control of Destiny | PC Gamer also can you stop with “YoUr PoStInG YoUr OpiNionS As FaCt” I’m giving information about the game I don’t care much for battle royal but you cannot seem to grasp that they won’t be making a stand alone game but they may make a gamemode. And if you don’t understand that information than there’s nothing I can do to help you.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You’re giving wrong information of the game. Activision has never had anything to do with Halo, not in any way, shape or form, and the part about Destiny is the most relevant thing about it. It’s about Destiny and Activision, NOT Halo and Activision. Also, other forum users have told you the same thing. Again I’ll ask, please link where Activision were directly involved in Halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. What you linked has nothing to do with Activision and Halo. I already stated I don’t care whether it’s a stand alone or add on. If they make a Halo Battle Royale I think a stand alone would be better. The parts about Battle Royale are my opinions, the part about Activision not being involved with Halo is a fact.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It does not prove your point in any way. Bungie and Microsoft had parted ways long before Activision were on the scene. Activision have done nothing to Halo, and you also stated they were directly involved with Halo, they were not. All you’re trying to do is back up your opinion with false info. Back on topic…
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale mode. However, there are players that would like Battle Royale. It’s my hope that they make one in the future. If they make it, I’m not bothered how they do it, either add on or stand alone, but it’s my opinion a stand alone would be better. 1) Players that don’t like it can avoid it. 2) It does not affect another title by replacing another mode. 3) They can dedicate full recources to that game.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LAlso I agree that a battle royal would be fun but I disagree with the fact that you can just ignore the game if you don’t like it as it would have to fit in story wise and make sense in the lore otherwise it’s just a game that looks like halo with different gameplay mechanics
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can just ignore it if you don’t like Battle Royale. I already stated I don’t like RTS games like Halo Wars. I’ll admit I bought the first Halo Wars, but I never completed it and I ignored Halo Wars 2 because of the type of game it is. Halo Wars 2 is exactly what you describe, it’s a game that looks like Halo with different gameplay mechanics. It also was made to fit the lore and it can be ignored, I pass on all RTS games. There is no reason a Halo Battle Royale cannot be made to fit the lore too.
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree with you about halo wars but you have to at least understand to lore behind the game, this is why I think ODST would work best as they have so much potential atm which could possibly make a battle royal as they make sense in the lore to do something like this but in a training simulation that it. Spartans not so much at the moment as the enhanced mobility given to them in halo 5 would completely ruin gameplay as it would be a matter of who Spartan charges first or ground slams you get the idea. I would be ok with a battle royal existing as long as it doesn’t take away from the main games, doesn’t have a battle pass system and makes sense in the lore.
> > > >
> > > > Fair points. However you’re thinking of Spartans as they are in Halo 5. How about a Battle Royale with teams of MK 2 against MK 1, or ODST training against Spartans, or a solo Spartan guarding a sniper or other rare weapons ? There are so many different ways it could work. As for lore, I already said it could be made to fit the lore. Also you say Spartans with enhanced mobility would ruin it ? I would love that, 100 Spartans dropping with a base loadout of magnum and assault rifle with rare weapons randomly on the map and being able to run at up to 55 kph or more ? Bring it on, in my opinion that would be fantastic.
> > >
> > > I mean the thruster packs and Spartan charges as those abilities would annihilate anybody unsuspecting, Spartans in the other halos would be ok but I still think it makes more sense with ODST as they are the only ones in the lore to drop out of pods as often as they do.
> >
> > For sure. I’m in agreement that ODST are the only ones that use drop pods, but I also remember Master Chief escaping the Pillar of Autumn on an escape pod in Halo Combat Evolved, there’s another possibility. Spartans could be dropped in fleets of Pelicans, I’m sure Warzone starts like that, I only played a little on release and stopped so I’m not 100%. Then there’s the drop pods that fit in the Pelicans. There are so many possibilities.
> >
> > Edit. Sorry mods, messed up my quotes.
>
> That would make sense as a battle royal but it would have to elaborate on the fact that it is a simulation like maybe having the Spartans go into a vr or something similar before hand so that players understand what’s going on, if a battle royal does happen despite what frank said I hope they don’t implement any battle pass systems as that just decides the fan base and annoys players
Palmer tells you Warzone is a Spartan training simulation on approach, they can do the same with Battle Royale. I still prefer the idea of Spartans using drop pods. Or, how about the terrain is different, drop pods and Pelicans with Warhogs ? I could sit and post Battle Royale ideas all day. As for battle passes, it depends how they implement them, if at all.
> 2592250499819446;211:
> > 2535421570132842;204:
> > > 2592250499819446;200:
> > > > 2535421570132842;196:
> > > > > 2592250499819446;191:
> > > > > > 2535421570132842;190:
> > > > > > > 2592250499819446;185:
> > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;184:
> > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;179:
> > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;165:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;160:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;155:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;154:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;153:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;152:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;149:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;145:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;143:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can’t be bothered with this you can’t tell me what the director says is wrong when he’s the one in charge of making halo, they have stated that they will always treat it as a game mode rather than a stand alone game which you cannot grasp so if you seriously can’t take the truth then I cannot be held responsible for your ignorance and if you knew that much about halo you would understand that activision was directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes I don’t know how you don’t know this information?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know what Frank said. It’s my opinion that a stand alone Halo would be better, that’s what you cannot seem to grasp. It’s also my hope that they do make a stand alone, changes can be made and game studios change too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please link where Activision was involved with Halo 4 and 5.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can grasp it you just don’t understand it as I’m not talking about your “opinion” im talking about fact, also Let me try and explained the Reason activision is involved, activision was in charge on Bungie the original creators of halo but due to the changes activision wanted to incorporate Bungie split from the company and activision put 343 in charge making the whole dilemma activisions fault.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > You’re not talking about facts. You’re stating your opinions as facts. Again, you’re of the opinion Activision was involved with Halo, please link where Activision were directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. It did not happen, Activision have never been involved with Halo.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The part about destiny isn’t relevant Bungie splits with Activision, keeps control of Destiny | PC Gamer also can you stop with “YoUr PoStInG YoUr OpiNionS As FaCt” I’m giving information about the game I don’t care much for battle royal but you cannot seem to grasp that they won’t be making a stand alone game but they may make a gamemode. And if you don’t understand that information than there’s nothing I can do to help you.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You’re giving wrong information of the game. Activision has never had anything to do with Halo, not in any way, shape or form, and the part about Destiny is the most relevant thing about it. It’s about Destiny and Activision, NOT Halo and Activision. Also, other forum users have told you the same thing. Again I’ll ask, please link where Activision were directly involved in Halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. What you linked has nothing to do with Activision and Halo. I already stated I don’t care whether it’s a stand alone or add on. If they make a Halo Battle Royale I think a stand alone would be better. The parts about Battle Royale are my opinions, the part about Activision not being involved with Halo is a fact.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It does not prove your point in any way. Bungie and Microsoft had parted ways long before Activision were on the scene. Activision have done nothing to Halo, and you also stated they were directly involved with Halo, they were not. All you’re trying to do is back up your opinion with false info. Back on topic…
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale mode. However, there are players that would like Battle Royale. It’s my hope that they make one in the future. If they make it, I’m not bothered how they do it, either add on or stand alone, but it’s my opinion a stand alone would be better. 1) Players that don’t like it can avoid it. 2) It does not affect another title by replacing another mode. 3) They can dedicate full recources to that game.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > LAlso I agree that a battle royal would be fun but I disagree with the fact that you can just ignore the game if you don’t like it as it would have to fit in story wise and make sense in the lore otherwise it’s just a game that looks like halo with different gameplay mechanics
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can just ignore it if you don’t like Battle Royale. I already stated I don’t like RTS games like Halo Wars. I’ll admit I bought the first Halo Wars, but I never completed it and I ignored Halo Wars 2 because of the type of game it is. Halo Wars 2 is exactly what you describe, it’s a game that looks like Halo with different gameplay mechanics. It also was made to fit the lore and it can be ignored, I pass on all RTS games. There is no reason a Halo Battle Royale cannot be made to fit the lore too.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I agree with you about halo wars but you have to at least understand to lore behind the game, this is why I think ODST would work best as they have so much potential atm which could possibly make a battle royal as they make sense in the lore to do something like this but in a training simulation that it. Spartans not so much at the moment as the enhanced mobility given to them in halo 5 would completely ruin gameplay as it would be a matter of who Spartan charges first or ground slams you get the idea. I would be ok with a battle royal existing as long as it doesn’t take away from the main games, doesn’t have a battle pass system and makes sense in the lore.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fair points. However you’re thinking of Spartans as they are in Halo 5. How about a Battle Royale with teams of MK 2 against MK 1, or ODST training against Spartans, or a solo Spartan guarding a sniper or other rare weapons ? There are so many different ways it could work. As for lore, I already said it could be made to fit the lore. Also you say Spartans with enhanced mobility would ruin it ? I would love that, 100 Spartans dropping with a base loadout of magnum and assault rifle with rare weapons randomly on the map and being able to run at up to 55 kph or more ? Bring it on, in my opinion that would be fantastic.
> > > >
> > > > I mean the thruster packs and Spartan charges as those abilities would annihilate anybody unsuspecting, Spartans in the other halos would be ok but I still think it makes more sense with ODST as they are the only ones in the lore to drop out of pods as often as they do.
> > >
> > > That would make sense as a battle royal but it would have to elaborate on the fact that it is a simulation like maybe having the Spartans go into a vr or something similar before hand so that players understand what’s going on, if a battle royal does happen despite what frank said I hope they don’t implement any battle pass systems as that just decides the fan base and annoys players
>
> Palmer tells you Warzone is a Spartan training simulation on approach, they can do the same with Battle Royale. I still prefer the idea of Spartans using drop pods. Or, how about the terrain is different, drop pods and Pelicans with Warhogs ? I could sit and post Battle Royale ideas all day. As for battle passes, it depends how they implement them, if at all.
Sry I didn’t respond broke my iPad a few days ago, I think that battle passes bring out the worst in the community as it divides players into two groups the ones who have the battle pass and the ones that don’t the ones that have the pass usually make fun of the ones who don’t. As for the Spartans I see your point, what do you think they would do about vehicles though as they would either have to be changed or removed as in their current state most vehicles have the ability to “one shot” a player.
> 2533274855353246;1:
> I would like a halo battle royale plz.
Let ppl experiment on forge it would be like a day z sort of thing but not as a core playlist defo no
(Firefight, invasion, warzone)already pretty good. Big ffa one life per round custom games we can do that in halo 5 now!If enough people play it they might put it in matchmaking. Custom Browser is awesome but is mostly fun and silly, competitive still can be intense. halo 5 can go serious to haliarious quickly.
I’m fine with a BR but as long as it’s an after thought. Multiplayer and good story has to be their main goal and focus.
ZOCKERBOY117
Hmm, I don’t think that Halo needs Battle Royale. In my opinion Halo should keep like it always was (and it must have Warzone ahahah). Halo is the greatest game I’ve ever played and I will play it all of my life, but I want to be honest…Halo doesn’t need the Battle Royale, because Halo is unique and the Battle Royale would destroy this uniqueness.
Ask yourself, would Halo be better without BR and with staying in it’s traditional way, or do you want that it is like Fortnite that is so stupid?
Everyone got his own opinion but ask yourself the question!!!
A nice day/night to everybody and have some good kills!!!
See you guys 
> 2535421570132842;204:
> > 2592250499819446;200:
> > > 2535421570132842;196:
> > > > 2592250499819446;191:
> > > > > 2535421570132842;190:
> > > > > > 2592250499819446;185:
> > > > > > > 2535421570132842;184:
> > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;179:
> > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;165:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;160:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;155:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;154:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;153:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;152:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;149:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;145:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;143:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can’t be bothered with this you can’t tell me what the director says is wrong when he’s the one in charge of making halo, they have stated that they will always treat it as a game mode rather than a stand alone game which you cannot grasp so if you seriously can’t take the truth then I cannot be held responsible for your ignorance and if you knew that much about halo you would understand that activision was directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes I don’t know how you don’t know this information?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know what Frank said. It’s my opinion that a stand alone Halo would be better, that’s what you cannot seem to grasp. It’s also my hope that they do make a stand alone, changes can be made and game studios change too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please link where Activision was involved with Halo 4 and 5.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I can grasp it you just don’t understand it as I’m not talking about your “opinion” im talking about fact, also Let me try and explained the Reason activision is involved, activision was in charge on Bungie the original creators of halo but due to the changes activision wanted to incorporate Bungie split from the company and activision put 343 in charge making the whole dilemma activisions fault.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You’re not talking about facts. You’re stating your opinions as facts. Again, you’re of the opinion Activision was involved with Halo, please link where Activision were directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. It did not happen, Activision have never been involved with Halo.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The part about destiny isn’t relevant Bungie splits with Activision, keeps control of Destiny | PC Gamer also can you stop with “YoUr PoStInG YoUr OpiNionS As FaCt” I’m giving information about the game I don’t care much for battle royal but you cannot seem to grasp that they won’t be making a stand alone game but they may make a gamemode. And if you don’t understand that information than there’s nothing I can do to help you.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You’re giving wrong information of the game. Activision has never had anything to do with Halo, not in any way, shape or form, and the part about Destiny is the most relevant thing about it. It’s about Destiny and Activision, NOT Halo and Activision. Also, other forum users have told you the same thing. Again I’ll ask, please link where Activision were directly involved in Halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. What you linked has nothing to do with Activision and Halo. I already stated I don’t care whether it’s a stand alone or add on. If they make a Halo Battle Royale I think a stand alone would be better. The parts about Battle Royale are my opinions, the part about Activision not being involved with Halo is a fact.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It does not prove your point in any way. Bungie and Microsoft had parted ways long before Activision were on the scene. Activision have done nothing to Halo, and you also stated they were directly involved with Halo, they were not. All you’re trying to do is back up your opinion with false info. Back on topic…
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale mode. However, there are players that would like Battle Royale. It’s my hope that they make one in the future. If they make it, I’m not bothered how they do it, either add on or stand alone, but it’s my opinion a stand alone would be better. 1) Players that don’t like it can avoid it. 2) It does not affect another title by replacing another mode. 3) They can dedicate full recources to that game.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > LAlso I agree that a battle royal would be fun but I disagree with the fact that you can just ignore the game if you don’t like it as it would have to fit in story wise and make sense in the lore otherwise it’s just a game that looks like halo with different gameplay mechanics
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can just ignore it if you don’t like Battle Royale. I already stated I don’t like RTS games like Halo Wars. I’ll admit I bought the first Halo Wars, but I never completed it and I ignored Halo Wars 2 because of the type of game it is. Halo Wars 2 is exactly what you describe, it’s a game that looks like Halo with different gameplay mechanics. It also was made to fit the lore and it can be ignored, I pass on all RTS games. There is no reason a Halo Battle Royale cannot be made to fit the lore too.
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree with you about halo wars but you have to at least understand to lore behind the game, this is why I think ODST would work best as they have so much potential atm which could possibly make a battle royal as they make sense in the lore to do something like this but in a training simulation that it. Spartans not so much at the moment as the enhanced mobility given to them in halo 5 would completely ruin gameplay as it would be a matter of who Spartan charges first or ground slams you get the idea. I would be ok with a battle royal existing as long as it doesn’t take away from the main games, doesn’t have a battle pass system and makes sense in the lore.
> > > >
> > > > Fair points. However you’re thinking of Spartans as they are in Halo 5. How about a Battle Royale with teams of MK 2 against MK 1, or ODST training against Spartans, or a solo Spartan guarding a sniper or other rare weapons ? There are so many different ways it could work. As for lore, I already said it could be made to fit the lore. Also you say Spartans with enhanced mobility would ruin it ? I would love that, 100 Spartans dropping with a base loadout of magnum and assault rifle with rare weapons randomly on the map and being able to run at up to 55 kph or more ? Bring it on, in my opinion that would be fantastic.
It’s all good, no need to apologise. Battle passes can work, it depends how they implement them. I agree some users make fun of others but that happens all the time anyway. How many players were ridiculed and tea bagged for having recon in Halo 3 without it being in a game pass ? Or Hayabusa etc ? Online anonymity brings out the worst in a few rotten apples.
About vehicles. They’re designed for getting across the map and taking out other players. Maybe a team / player can get them dropped with a call to Foe Hammer like we did in the Halo CE campaign. No reqs though, something like having to earn XP from time on the map or doing small missions. CoD Blackout had zombies guarding certain places on the map with better weapons etc, it’s risk for reward or leave alone.
That could be options for calling in weaponised warthogs. Have areas with Covenant guarding weapons or comms. Or, how about warthogs and mongooses, mongeese or whatever the plural is on the on the map but without weapons. You can get the vehicles for transport but have to scavenge for armaments. So many options. I think Halo is ideal for Battle Royale, also with Forge we could fo what we want if 343i allow us.
I’m talking about us being able to forge on their maps and submit our ideas for consideration. I think there’s no end to the possibilities.
> 2535459110524661;216:
> ZOCKERBOY117Ask yourself, would Halo be better without BR and with staying in it’s traditional way, or do you want that it is like Fortnite that is so stupid?
Ask yourself this. Why does it have to be like Fortnite ? I want a Halo Battle Royale, but not like Fortnite. To be honest I don’t know one single player that would want a Halo Battle Royale like Fortnite. It has unique elements that would not work in Halo, building being the first.
Edit: Why are quotes not working ? Aarrrrgh. I know it’s me, sorry mods.
> 2592250499819446;218:
> > 2535459110524661;216:
> > ZOCKERBOY117Ask yourself, would Halo be better without BR and with staying in it’s traditional way, or do you want that it is like Fortnite that is so stupid?
>
> Ask yourself this. Why does it have to be like Fortnite ? I want a Halo Battle Royale, but not like Fortnite. To be honest I don’t know one single player that would want a Halo Battle Royale like Fortnite. It has unique elements that would not work in Halo, building being the first.
>
> Edit: Why are quotes not working ? Aarrrrgh. I know it’s me, sorry mods.
Hmm, I think I wouldn’t be a big fan of BR, but if it’s like you say in an way that is not like fortnite, then I’d love to have BR.
> 2535459110524661;219:
> > 2592250499819446;218:
> > > 2535459110524661;216:
> > > ZOCKERBOY117Ask yourself, would Halo be better without BR and with staying in it’s traditional way, or do you want that it is like Fortnite that is so stupid?
> >
> > Ask yourself this. Why does it have to be like Fortnite ? I want a Halo Battle Royale, but not like Fortnite. To be honest I don’t know one single player that would want a Halo Battle Royale like Fortnite. It has unique elements that would not work in Halo, building being the first.
> >
> > Edit: Why are quotes not working ? Aarrrrgh. I know it’s me, sorry mods.
>
> Hmm, I think I wouldn’t be a big fan of BR, but if it’s like you say in an way that is not like fortnite, then I’d love to have BR.
Depends if you like BR. I don’t like Warzone so I don’t play it but others do. I think Halo is perfect for Battle Royale. Think about this, since Halo CE we’ve dropped as Spartans onto Halo rings in escape pods, drop pods at the dam in Halo 2, we’ve had Foe Hammer drop supplies in Pelicans, remember in Halo 3 where Forward Unto Dawn dropped out of orbit with troops and scorpion tanks ?
Any or all of those could work in a Halo Battle Royale imo.Think about this. In Halo we’ve always been on the edge of epic battles. Remember this cut scene from Halo Reach ? How about we remained in that battle ? That might work. Also, what about space and ground missions working in tandem ? Or Battle Royale ground missions with a space port where we can access Sabers ? Think Long Night of Solace.
Are you still thinking Fortnite ? Halo has the back story and assets to make the best Battle Royale imo.