No, don’t bring the parasite to consume the entire halo franchise.
> 2533274814945686;178:
> AV is activision… for those who dont know : P
> And MS is microsoft uwu
> But yep couldnt have said it better myself.
> I can imagine the guy doesnt trust mainstream media thou
I do and I realised my mistake as I got confused and mixed up the problems with destiny and halo, Microsoft’s the reason we have 343 instead of Bungie. Activision wasn’t involved in halo but was with destiny, i don’t know how I got the two confused
> 2533274795098161;177:
> > 2535421570132842;173:
> > > 2533274814945686;169:
> > > > 2533274795123910;168:
> > > > > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > > > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
> > > >
> > > > So, what exact action by Activision described in the link proves Bungie would still be in charge of Halo?
> > > >
> > > > I mean, all talk is about Destiny 2, no years are mentioned, Halo and Microsoft are not to be found anywhere in the article. Not only that but Bungie retained all controll of Destiny 2
> > > >
> > > > The article is from 2019, and the split between Microsoft and Bungie was announced in 2007. Activision came into the picture 3 years later for Bungie.
> > > >
> > > > So, how do you connect the dots between the Bungie - Microsoft split and Activision, based on that article you linked?
> > >
> > > Well you see, Microsoft bungie jumped onto halo during its first act to aquire a new vision for the xbox. But then when bungie decided to make their own destiny seperate of microsoft…
> > > XD idk what im doing. lol
> > > The only thing that I can remotely take from what Anonymous is saying if anything he is saying holds any truth… Its that Bungie wouldnt have been able to make destiny without activision.
> > > So what might be going through is brain is the following:
> > > Bungie wanted to do destiny and hence quit halo
> > > Activision enabled Bungie to make destiny
> > >
> > > And what follows in this form of flawed logic is: Activision enabled bungie to quit halo
> > > Which is false. The truth is bungie wanted to get free from the grip of microsoft… and unfortunately for them, microsoft owned halo. So they had to depart. But in the meanwhile they were developing destiny. Unfortunately for them again they figured they wouldnt have the budget to complete it, and so they found funding from activision… whom is yet another terrible company…
> > > Helpless in the financial situation… they went under a company arguably worse than microsoft, only correcting that mistake later down the line.
> > >
> > > 
> > > So story telling is over, and now Id like to present my idea of a halo battle royale mode that ive been thinking of since the days of halo 3 lol.
> > > Back then i never even imagined what a battle royale was. BUT… i guess there were Massive onling multiplayer games at around that time.
> > > So i imagined we could choose our own factions, spawning to be unique to the division of what you chose…
> > > For example, if you chose UNSC odst division, the most notable perk would be to choose your spawn point (because you spawn in ODST pods)
> > > If you chose a spartan division, you would be deployed by pelican with your squad to limited locations (because of enemy territories defended by AA systems)
> > >
> > > From the covanant perspective , drop pods would be exclusice to infiltration and storm divisions
> > > etc…
> > >
> > > And have like a limited number of lives … maybe odst divisions have more lives than spartans? to balance?
> > > And in all of this the maps are huge, and throughout there are weapon supply crates and zones. Capturing zones allow you to call in resupplies and reinforcements… and additionally allows you to spawn at that zone.
> > > Most importantly, there are alot of players… like… alot alot… 64+
> > > Thats just the beggining of my idea, but what do you think?
> >
> > I’m not that good at explaining things but yes I blame activision and Microsoft for halo 4 and 5 as they caused Bungie to leave and then 343 had to take over which resulted in halo games that sucked. Also you idea sounds great
>
> But how is Activision connected in all this? Can you at least try to explain than?
>
> The issue we are having here is that we don’t see the connection between Activision and Bungie leaving Halo, because what happened officially is this:
>
> Bungie and MS had known issues since at least 2003 and bought themselves their independence in 2007 with a contract to produce at least two more Halo games. It was during that transition when MS Game Studios (now XBox Studios) under Don Matrick started to recruit the first few elements of a new team that would than become 343i.
>
> Bungie in the mean time started the Destiny pre-production, got the rights to name around the same time of ODST and had the first concepts ready after the last Reach update. With those concepts in hand and the need for funds to actually produce Destiny, Bungie started to search for a new publisher. One that wasn’t MS. Activision apperently offered the best deal or was the only one to take the risk with a new IP, sold them a share and developed the game.
>
> All this was Bungie’s doing though! If it wasn’t AV, then it would have been Ubisoft, EA, Bethesda or some other major publisher. Maybe discussions had been made prior to leave Reach, but that’s still years after Bungie decided to leave MS and Halo behind.
>
> That’s why what you claim makes no sense. AV had no involvement with Halo at all and Destiny’s preproduction had been done years prior to that partnership. So why are you blaming them? And what has this to do with a HYPOTHETICAL stand alone BR spin-off? I’m a bit confused to say the least! 
I think I’ve made a mistake. I’ve gotten confused between the problem that happened with destiny and the problem with halo, activision was the reason for destiny’s problems and Microsoft’s was the reason for halos. Also this all started because somebody said 343 didn’t need any help ruining halo, I disagreed because they have never made a halo game and the company in charge of 343 are to blame for assigning a company that hasn’t made a halo game to make a halo game
> 2592250499819446;179:
> > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > 2592250499819446;165:
> > > > 2535421570132842;160:
> > > > > 2592250499819446;155:
> > > > > > 2535421570132842;154:
> > > > > > > 2592250499819446;153:
> > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;152:
> > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;149:
> > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;145:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;143:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I can’t be bothered with this you can’t tell me what the director says is wrong when he’s the one in charge of making halo, they have stated that they will always treat it as a game mode rather than a stand alone game which you cannot grasp so if you seriously can’t take the truth then I cannot be held responsible for your ignorance and if you knew that much about halo you would understand that activision was directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes I don’t know how you don’t know this information?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I know what Frank said. It’s my opinion that a stand alone Halo would be better, that’s what you cannot seem to grasp. It’s also my hope that they do make a stand alone, changes can be made and game studios change too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please link where Activision was involved with Halo 4 and 5.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can grasp it you just don’t understand it as I’m not talking about your “opinion” im talking about fact, also Let me try and explained the Reason activision is involved, activision was in charge on Bungie the original creators of halo but due to the changes activision wanted to incorporate Bungie split from the company and activision put 343 in charge making the whole dilemma activisions fault.
> > > > >
> > > > > You’re not talking about facts. You’re stating your opinions as facts. Again, you’re of the opinion Activision was involved with Halo, please link where Activision were directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. It did not happen, Activision have never been involved with Halo.
> > > >
> > > > The part about destiny isn’t relevant Bungie splits with Activision, keeps control of Destiny | PC Gamer also can you stop with “YoUr PoStInG YoUr OpiNionS As FaCt” I’m giving information about the game I don’t care much for battle royal but you cannot seem to grasp that they won’t be making a stand alone game but they may make a gamemode. And if you don’t understand that information than there’s nothing I can do to help you.
> > >
> > > You’re giving wrong information of the game. Activision has never had anything to do with Halo, not in any way, shape or form, and the part about Destiny is the most relevant thing about it. It’s about Destiny and Activision, NOT Halo and Activision. Also, other forum users have told you the same thing. Again I’ll ask, please link where Activision were directly involved in Halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. What you linked has nothing to do with Activision and Halo. I already stated I don’t care whether it’s a stand alone or add on. If they make a Halo Battle Royale I think a stand alone would be better. The parts about Battle Royale are my opinions, the part about Activision not being involved with Halo is a fact.
> >
> > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
>
> It does not prove your point in any way. Bungie and Microsoft had parted ways long before Activision were on the scene. Activision have done nothing to Halo, and you also stated they were directly involved with Halo, they were not. All you’re trying to do is back up your opinion with false info. Back on topic…
>
> Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale mode. However, there are players that would like Battle Royale. It’s my hope that they make one in the future. If they make it, I’m not bothered how they do it, either add on or stand alone, but it’s my opinion a stand alone would be better. 1) Players that don’t like it can avoid it. 2) It does not affect another title by replacing another mode. 3) They can dedicate full recources to that game.
I admit my mistake in thinking activision was involved I got confused between the problem with halo and destiny, Microsoft’s to blame for assigning 343 to halo instead of assigning a studio that at least has involvement in halo. Also I agree that a battle royal would be fun but I disagree with the fact that you can just ignore the game if you don’t like it as it would have to fit in story wise and make sense in the lore otherwise it’s just a game that looks like halo with different gameplay mechanics
> 2535421570132842;184:
> > 2592250499819446;179:
> > > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > > 2592250499819446;165:
> > > > > 2535421570132842;160:
> > > > > > 2592250499819446;155:
> > > > > > > 2535421570132842;154:
> > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;153:
> > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;152:
> > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;149:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;145:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;143:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I can’t be bothered with this you can’t tell me what the director says is wrong when he’s the one in charge of making halo, they have stated that they will always treat it as a game mode rather than a stand alone game which you cannot grasp so if you seriously can’t take the truth then I cannot be held responsible for your ignorance and if you knew that much about halo you would understand that activision was directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes I don’t know how you don’t know this information?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I know what Frank said. It’s my opinion that a stand alone Halo would be better, that’s what you cannot seem to grasp. It’s also my hope that they do make a stand alone, changes can be made and game studios change too.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please link where Activision was involved with Halo 4 and 5.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I can grasp it you just don’t understand it as I’m not talking about your “opinion” im talking about fact, also Let me try and explained the Reason activision is involved, activision was in charge on Bungie the original creators of halo but due to the changes activision wanted to incorporate Bungie split from the company and activision put 343 in charge making the whole dilemma activisions fault.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You’re not talking about facts. You’re stating your opinions as facts. Again, you’re of the opinion Activision was involved with Halo, please link where Activision were directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. It did not happen, Activision have never been involved with Halo.
> > > > >
> > > > > The part about destiny isn’t relevant Bungie splits with Activision, keeps control of Destiny | PC Gamer also can you stop with “YoUr PoStInG YoUr OpiNionS As FaCt” I’m giving information about the game I don’t care much for battle royal but you cannot seem to grasp that they won’t be making a stand alone game but they may make a gamemode. And if you don’t understand that information than there’s nothing I can do to help you.
> > > >
> > > > You’re giving wrong information of the game. Activision has never had anything to do with Halo, not in any way, shape or form, and the part about Destiny is the most relevant thing about it. It’s about Destiny and Activision, NOT Halo and Activision. Also, other forum users have told you the same thing. Again I’ll ask, please link where Activision were directly involved in Halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. What you linked has nothing to do with Activision and Halo. I already stated I don’t care whether it’s a stand alone or add on. If they make a Halo Battle Royale I think a stand alone would be better. The parts about Battle Royale are my opinions, the part about Activision not being involved with Halo is a fact.
> > >
> > > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
> >
> > It does not prove your point in any way. Bungie and Microsoft had parted ways long before Activision were on the scene. Activision have done nothing to Halo, and you also stated they were directly involved with Halo, they were not. All you’re trying to do is back up your opinion with false info. Back on topic…
> >
> > Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale mode. However, there are players that would like Battle Royale. It’s my hope that they make one in the future. If they make it, I’m not bothered how they do it, either add on or stand alone, but it’s my opinion a stand alone would be better. 1) Players that don’t like it can avoid it. 2) It does not affect another title by replacing another mode. 3) They can dedicate full recources to that game.
>
> Also I agree that a battle royal would be fun but I disagree with the fact that you can just ignore the game if you don’t like it as it would have to fit in story wise and make sense in the lore otherwise it’s just a game that looks like halo with different gameplay mechanics
You can just ignore it if you don’t like Battle Royale. I already stated I don’t like RTS games like Halo Wars. I’ll admit I bought the first Halo Wars, but I never completed it and I ignored Halo Wars 2 because of the type of game it is. Halo Wars 2 is exactly what you describe, it’s a game that looks like Halo with different gameplay mechanics. It also was made to fit the lore and it can be ignored, I pass on all RTS games. There is no reason a Halo Battle Royale cannot be made to fit the lore too.
Never in my life
im just gonnna wait till infinite releases… make an awsome battle royale in forge… and see all these people complaining about it eventually playing it lol
> 2533274814945686;187:
> im just gonnna wait till infinite releases… make an awsome battle royale in forge… and see all these people complaining about it eventually playing it lol
That’s the attitude I like to see, Hopefully they have a large forge world like environment to work with. Also a death zone component that works in confining players to a certain part of the map. I just wonder how you can get a custom game type to facilitate this kind of game (hud/prompting components).
> 2533274930858883;188:
> > 2533274814945686;187:
> > im just gonnna wait till infinite releases… make an awsome battle royale in forge… and see all these people complaining about it eventually playing it lol
>
> That’s the attitude I like to see, Hopefully they have a large forge world like environment to work with. Also a death zone component that works in confining players to a certain part of the map. I just wonder how you can get a custom game type to facilitate this kind of game (hud/prompting components).
Hmm that is actually an interesting point. So Im pretty sure things like waypoints are rather easy to implement. Soft killzones already promt that count down timer on the hud. I think the trick with the death zone that would help alot is to be able to make “negative” kill zone… or perhaps a haven zone… that if you are out of it kills you…
Trait zones might also do the trick. I believe there is the property on shield regeneration where you can have it leech sheild.
just ideas im throwing out there. If im not mistaken, do they already have some nice effects in forge in halo 5? i forget. If so adding some fog or splashes at the boundaries could go a long way as well with the help of some scripting.
> 2592250499819446;185:
> > 2535421570132842;184:
> > > 2592250499819446;179:
> > > > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > > > 2592250499819446;165:
> > > > > > 2535421570132842;160:
> > > > > > > 2592250499819446;155:
> > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;154:
> > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;153:
> > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;152:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;149:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;145:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;143:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I can’t be bothered with this you can’t tell me what the director says is wrong when he’s the one in charge of making halo, they have stated that they will always treat it as a game mode rather than a stand alone game which you cannot grasp so if you seriously can’t take the truth then I cannot be held responsible for your ignorance and if you knew that much about halo you would understand that activision was directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes I don’t know how you don’t know this information?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I know what Frank said. It’s my opinion that a stand alone Halo would be better, that’s what you cannot seem to grasp. It’s also my hope that they do make a stand alone, changes can be made and game studios change too.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please link where Activision was involved with Halo 4 and 5.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I can grasp it you just don’t understand it as I’m not talking about your “opinion” im talking about fact, also Let me try and explained the Reason activision is involved, activision was in charge on Bungie the original creators of halo but due to the changes activision wanted to incorporate Bungie split from the company and activision put 343 in charge making the whole dilemma activisions fault.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You’re not talking about facts. You’re stating your opinions as facts. Again, you’re of the opinion Activision was involved with Halo, please link where Activision were directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. It did not happen, Activision have never been involved with Halo.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The part about destiny isn’t relevant Bungie splits with Activision, keeps control of Destiny | PC Gamer also can you stop with “YoUr PoStInG YoUr OpiNionS As FaCt” I’m giving information about the game I don’t care much for battle royal but you cannot seem to grasp that they won’t be making a stand alone game but they may make a gamemode. And if you don’t understand that information than there’s nothing I can do to help you.
> > > > >
> > > > > You’re giving wrong information of the game. Activision has never had anything to do with Halo, not in any way, shape or form, and the part about Destiny is the most relevant thing about it. It’s about Destiny and Activision, NOT Halo and Activision. Also, other forum users have told you the same thing. Again I’ll ask, please link where Activision were directly involved in Halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. What you linked has nothing to do with Activision and Halo. I already stated I don’t care whether it’s a stand alone or add on. If they make a Halo Battle Royale I think a stand alone would be better. The parts about Battle Royale are my opinions, the part about Activision not being involved with Halo is a fact.
> > > >
> > > > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
> > >
> > > It does not prove your point in any way. Bungie and Microsoft had parted ways long before Activision were on the scene. Activision have done nothing to Halo, and you also stated they were directly involved with Halo, they were not. All you’re trying to do is back up your opinion with false info. Back on topic…
> > >
> > > Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale mode. However, there are players that would like Battle Royale. It’s my hope that they make one in the future. If they make it, I’m not bothered how they do it, either add on or stand alone, but it’s my opinion a stand alone would be better. 1) Players that don’t like it can avoid it. 2) It does not affect another title by replacing another mode. 3) They can dedicate full recources to that game.
> >
> > Also I agree that a battle royal would be fun but I disagree with the fact that you can just ignore the game if you don’t like it as it would have to fit in story wise and make sense in the lore otherwise it’s just a game that looks like halo with different gameplay mechanics
>
> You can just ignore it if you don’t like Battle Royale. I already stated I don’t like RTS games like Halo Wars. I’ll admit I bought the first Halo Wars, but I never completed it and I ignored Halo Wars 2 because of the type of game it is. Halo Wars 2 is exactly what you describe, it’s a game that looks like Halo with different gameplay mechanics. It also was made to fit the lore and it can be ignored, I pass on all RTS games. There is no reason a Halo Battle Royale cannot be made to fit the lore too.
I agree with you about halo wars but you have to at least understand to lore behind the game, this is why I think ODST would work best as they have so much potential atm which could possibly make a battle royal as they make sense in the lore to do something like this but in a training simulation that it. Spartans not so much at the moment as the enhanced mobility given to them in halo 5 would completely ruin gameplay as it would be a matter of who Spartan charges first or ground slams you get the idea. I would be ok with a battle royal existing as long as it doesn’t take away from the main games, doesn’t have a battle pass system and makes sense in the lore.
> 2535421570132842;190:
> > 2592250499819446;185:
> > > 2535421570132842;184:
> > > > 2592250499819446;179:
> > > > > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > > > > 2592250499819446;165:
> > > > > > > 2535421570132842;160:
> > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;155:
> > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;154:
> > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;153:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;152:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;149:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;145:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;143:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > A
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I can’t be bothered with this you can’t tell me what the director says is wrong when he’s the one in charge of making halo, they have stated that they will always treat it as a game mode rather than a stand alone game which you cannot grasp so if you seriously can’t take the truth then I cannot be held responsible for your ignorance and if you knew that much about halo you would understand that activision was directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes I don’t know how you don’t know this information?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I know what Frank said. It’s my opinion that a stand alone Halo would be better, that’s what you cannot seem to grasp. It’s also my hope that they do make a stand alone, changes can be made and game studios change too.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Please link where Activision was involved with Halo 4 and 5.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I can grasp it you just don’t understand it as I’m not talking about your “opinion” im talking about fact, also Let me try and explained the Reason activision is involved, activision was in charge on Bungie the original creators of halo but due to the changes activision wanted to incorporate Bungie split from the company and activision put 343 in charge making the whole dilemma activisions fault.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You’re not talking about facts. You’re stating your opinions as facts. Again, you’re of the opinion Activision was involved with Halo, please link where Activision were directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. It did not happen, Activision have never been involved with Halo.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The part about destiny isn’t relevant Bungie splits with Activision, keeps control of Destiny | PC Gamer also can you stop with “YoUr PoStInG YoUr OpiNionS As FaCt” I’m giving information about the game I don’t care much for battle royal but you cannot seem to grasp that they won’t be making a stand alone game but they may make a gamemode. And if you don’t understand that information than there’s nothing I can do to help you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You’re giving wrong information of the game. Activision has never had anything to do with Halo, not in any way, shape or form, and the part about Destiny is the most relevant thing about it. It’s about Destiny and Activision, NOT Halo and Activision. Also, other forum users have told you the same thing. Again I’ll ask, please link where Activision were directly involved in Halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. What you linked has nothing to do with Activision and Halo. I already stated I don’t care whether it’s a stand alone or add on. If they make a Halo Battle Royale I think a stand alone would be better. The parts about Battle Royale are my opinions, the part about Activision not being involved with Halo is a fact.
> > > > >
> > > > > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
> > > >
> > > > It does not prove your point in any way. Bungie and Microsoft had parted ways long before Activision were on the scene. Activision have done nothing to Halo, and you also stated they were directly involved with Halo, they were not. All you’re trying to do is back up your opinion with false info. Back on topic…
> > > >
> > > > Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale mode. However, there are players that would like Battle Royale. It’s my hope that they make one in the future. If they make it, I’m not bothered how they do it, either add on or stand alone, but it’s my opinion a stand alone would be better. 1) Players that don’t like it can avoid it. 2) It does not affect another title by replacing another mode. 3) They can dedicate full recources to that game.
> > >
> > > LAlso I agree that a battle royal would be fun but I disagree with the fact that you can just ignore the game if you don’t like it as it would have to fit in story wise and make sense in the lore otherwise it’s just a game that looks like halo with different gameplay mechanics
> >
> > You can just ignore it if you don’t like Battle Royale. I already stated I don’t like RTS games like Halo Wars. I’ll admit I bought the first Halo Wars, but I never completed it and I ignored Halo Wars 2 because of the type of game it is. Halo Wars 2 is exactly what you describe, it’s a game that looks like Halo with different gameplay mechanics. It also was made to fit the lore and it can be ignored, I pass on all RTS games. There is no reason a Halo Battle Royale cannot be made to fit the lore too.
>
> I agree with you about halo wars but you have to at least understand to lore behind the game, this is why I think ODST would work best as they have so much potential atm which could possibly make a battle royal as they make sense in the lore to do something like this but in a training simulation that it. Spartans not so much at the moment as the enhanced mobility given to them in halo 5 would completely ruin gameplay as it would be a matter of who Spartan charges first or ground slams you get the idea. I would be ok with a battle royal existing as long as it doesn’t take away from the main games, doesn’t have a battle pass system and makes sense in the lore.
Fair points. However you’re thinking of Spartans as they are in Halo 5. How about a Battle Royale with teams of MK 2 against MK 1, or ODST training against Spartans, or a solo Spartan guarding a sniper or other rare weapons ? There are so many different ways it could work. As for lore, I already said it could be made to fit the lore. Also you say Spartans with enhanced mobility would ruin it ? I would love that, 100 Spartans dropping with a base loadout of magnum and assault rifle with rare weapons randomly on the map and being able to run at up to 55 kph or more ? Bring it on, in my opinion that would be fantastic.
Please could we have no battle royale mode.It isnt necessary for a multiplayer game to thrive and almost all games with a battle royale mode are a mess because battle royale in a game leads to easy and definite profit and as a result leads to very little polish as the creators know they dont need to polish the mode because it’ll make money anyways - in short, battle royale in halo would drive away almost all actual halo fans and bring in kids who only play battle royale games - No thank you.
> 2535442879769873;192:
> Please could we have no battle royale mode.It isnt necessary for a multiplayer game to thrive and almost all games with a battle royale mode are a mess because battle royale in a game leads to easy and definite profit and as a result leads to very little polish as the creators know they dont need to polish the mode because it’ll make money anyways - in short, battle royale in halo would drive away almost all actual halo fans and bring in kids who only play battle royale games - No thank you.
I agree with this, a lot!!! …
> 2592250499819446;191:
> > 2535421570132842;190:
> > > 2592250499819446;185:
> > > > 2535421570132842;184:
> > > > > 2592250499819446;179:
> > > > > > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > > > > > 2592250499819446;165:
> > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;160:
> > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;155:
> > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;154:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;153:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;152:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;149:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;145:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;143:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I can’t be bothered with this you can’t tell me what the director says is wrong when he’s the one in charge of making halo, they have stated that they will always treat it as a game mode rather than a stand alone game which you cannot grasp so if you seriously can’t take the truth then I cannot be held responsible for your ignorance and if you knew that much about halo you would understand that activision was directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes I don’t know how you don’t know this information?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I know what Frank said. It’s my opinion that a stand alone Halo would be better, that’s what you cannot seem to grasp. It’s also my hope that they do make a stand alone, changes can be made and game studios change too.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Please link where Activision was involved with Halo 4 and 5.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I can grasp it you just don’t understand it as I’m not talking about your “opinion” im talking about fact, also Let me try and explained the Reason activision is involved, activision was in charge on Bungie the original creators of halo but due to the changes activision wanted to incorporate Bungie split from the company and activision put 343 in charge making the whole dilemma activisions fault.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You’re not talking about facts. You’re stating your opinions as facts. Again, you’re of the opinion Activision was involved with Halo, please link where Activision were directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. It did not happen, Activision have never been involved with Halo.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The part about destiny isn’t relevant Bungie splits with Activision, keeps control of Destiny | PC Gamer also can you stop with “YoUr PoStInG YoUr OpiNionS As FaCt” I’m giving information about the game I don’t care much for battle royal but you cannot seem to grasp that they won’t be making a stand alone game but they may make a gamemode. And if you don’t understand that information than there’s nothing I can do to help you.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You’re giving wrong information of the game. Activision has never had anything to do with Halo, not in any way, shape or form, and the part about Destiny is the most relevant thing about it. It’s about Destiny and Activision, NOT Halo and Activision. Also, other forum users have told you the same thing. Again I’ll ask, please link where Activision were directly involved in Halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. What you linked has nothing to do with Activision and Halo. I already stated I don’t care whether it’s a stand alone or add on. If they make a Halo Battle Royale I think a stand alone would be better. The parts about Battle Royale are my opinions, the part about Activision not being involved with Halo is a fact.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
> > > > >
> > > > > It does not prove your point in any way. Bungie and Microsoft had parted ways long before Activision were on the scene. Activision have done nothing to Halo, and you also stated they were directly involved with Halo, they were not. All you’re trying to do is back up your opinion with false info. Back on topic…
> > > > >
> > > > > Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale mode. However, there are players that would like Battle Royale. It’s my hope that they make one in the future. If they make it, I’m not bothered how they do it, either add on or stand alone, but it’s my opinion a stand alone would be better. 1) Players that don’t like it can avoid it. 2) It does not affect another title by replacing another mode. 3) They can dedicate full recources to that game.
> > > >
> > > > LAlso I agree that a battle royal would be fun but I disagree with the fact that you can just ignore the game if you don’t like it as it would have to fit in story wise and make sense in the lore otherwise it’s just a game that looks like halo with different gameplay mechanics
> > >
> > > You can just ignore it if you don’t like Battle Royale. I already stated I don’t like RTS games like Halo Wars. I’ll admit I bought the first Halo Wars, but I never completed it and I ignored Halo Wars 2 because of the type of game it is. Halo Wars 2 is exactly what you describe, it’s a game that looks like Halo with different gameplay mechanics. It also was made to fit the lore and it can be ignored, I pass on all RTS games. There is no reason a Halo Battle Royale cannot be made to fit the lore too.
> >
> > I agree with you about halo wars but you have to at least understand to lore behind the game, this is why I think ODST would work best as they have so much potential atm which could possibly make a battle royal as they make sense in the lore to do something like this but in a training simulation that it. Spartans not so much at the moment as the enhanced mobility given to them in halo 5 would completely ruin gameplay as it would be a matter of who Spartan charges first or ground slams you get the idea. I would be ok with a battle royal existing as long as it doesn’t take away from the main games, doesn’t have a battle pass system and makes sense in the lore.
>
> Fair points. However you’re thinking of Spartans as they are in Halo 5. How about a Battle Royale with teams of MK 2 against MK 1, or ODST training against Spartans, or a solo Spartan guarding a sniper or other rare weapons ? There are so many different ways it could work. As for lore, I already said it could be made to fit the lore. Also you say Spartans with enhanced mobility would ruin it ? I would love that, 100 Spartans dropping with a base loadout of magnum and assault rifle with rare weapons randomly on the map and being able to run at up to 55 kph or more ? Bring it on, in my opinion that would be fantastic.
Right, but the thread is asking if Infinite specifically need a Battle Royale, and Infinite is going to be a Master Chief installment. I could see there being a bad -Yoink- Royale Halo lore/theme and play styles, and weapons etc from 343, but that may be bette served in a non Chief installment, like a future release of another ODST style game.
A king of the hill type of battle royal is always something that came to mind for me anyways.
Ehh if it happens I would play it. If it doesnt well other BRs exist. Not gonna lie a BR would be cool… just wouldnt want to pay for seasons… idk. Just me. I’m already going to pay for the game…
> 2592250499819446;191:
> > 2535421570132842;190:
> > > 2592250499819446;185:
> > > > 2535421570132842;184:
> > > > > 2592250499819446;179:
> > > > > > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > > > > > 2592250499819446;165:
> > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;160:
> > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;155:
> > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;154:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;153:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;152:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;149:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;145:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;143:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I can’t be bothered with this you can’t tell me what the director says is wrong when he’s the one in charge of making halo, they have stated that they will always treat it as a game mode rather than a stand alone game which you cannot grasp so if you seriously can’t take the truth then I cannot be held responsible for your ignorance and if you knew that much about halo you would understand that activision was directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes I don’t know how you don’t know this information?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I know what Frank said. It’s my opinion that a stand alone Halo would be better, that’s what you cannot seem to grasp. It’s also my hope that they do make a stand alone, changes can be made and game studios change too.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Please link where Activision was involved with Halo 4 and 5.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I can grasp it you just don’t understand it as I’m not talking about your “opinion” im talking about fact, also Let me try and explained the Reason activision is involved, activision was in charge on Bungie the original creators of halo but due to the changes activision wanted to incorporate Bungie split from the company and activision put 343 in charge making the whole dilemma activisions fault.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You’re not talking about facts. You’re stating your opinions as facts. Again, you’re of the opinion Activision was involved with Halo, please link where Activision were directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. It did not happen, Activision have never been involved with Halo.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The part about destiny isn’t relevant Bungie splits with Activision, keeps control of Destiny | PC Gamer also can you stop with “YoUr PoStInG YoUr OpiNionS As FaCt” I’m giving information about the game I don’t care much for battle royal but you cannot seem to grasp that they won’t be making a stand alone game but they may make a gamemode. And if you don’t understand that information than there’s nothing I can do to help you.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You’re giving wrong information of the game. Activision has never had anything to do with Halo, not in any way, shape or form, and the part about Destiny is the most relevant thing about it. It’s about Destiny and Activision, NOT Halo and Activision. Also, other forum users have told you the same thing. Again I’ll ask, please link where Activision were directly involved in Halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. What you linked has nothing to do with Activision and Halo. I already stated I don’t care whether it’s a stand alone or add on. If they make a Halo Battle Royale I think a stand alone would be better. The parts about Battle Royale are my opinions, the part about Activision not being involved with Halo is a fact.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
> > > > >
> > > > > It does not prove your point in any way. Bungie and Microsoft had parted ways long before Activision were on the scene. Activision have done nothing to Halo, and you also stated they were directly involved with Halo, they were not. All you’re trying to do is back up your opinion with false info. Back on topic…
> > > > >
> > > > > Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale mode. However, there are players that would like Battle Royale. It’s my hope that they make one in the future. If they make it, I’m not bothered how they do it, either add on or stand alone, but it’s my opinion a stand alone would be better. 1) Players that don’t like it can avoid it. 2) It does not affect another title by replacing another mode. 3) They can dedicate full recources to that game.
> > > >
> > > > LAlso I agree that a battle royal would be fun but I disagree with the fact that you can just ignore the game if you don’t like it as it would have to fit in story wise and make sense in the lore otherwise it’s just a game that looks like halo with different gameplay mechanics
> > >
> > > You can just ignore it if you don’t like Battle Royale. I already stated I don’t like RTS games like Halo Wars. I’ll admit I bought the first Halo Wars, but I never completed it and I ignored Halo Wars 2 because of the type of game it is. Halo Wars 2 is exactly what you describe, it’s a game that looks like Halo with different gameplay mechanics. It also was made to fit the lore and it can be ignored, I pass on all RTS games. There is no reason a Halo Battle Royale cannot be made to fit the lore too.
> >
> > I agree with you about halo wars but you have to at least understand to lore behind the game, this is why I think ODST would work best as they have so much potential atm which could possibly make a battle royal as they make sense in the lore to do something like this but in a training simulation that it. Spartans not so much at the moment as the enhanced mobility given to them in halo 5 would completely ruin gameplay as it would be a matter of who Spartan charges first or ground slams you get the idea. I would be ok with a battle royal existing as long as it doesn’t take away from the main games, doesn’t have a battle pass system and makes sense in the lore.
>
> Fair points. However you’re thinking of Spartans as they are in Halo 5. How about a Battle Royale with teams of MK 2 against MK 1, or ODST training against Spartans, or a solo Spartan guarding a sniper or other rare weapons ? There are so many different ways it could work. As for lore, I already said it could be made to fit the lore. Also you say Spartans with enhanced mobility would ruin it ? I would love that, 100 Spartans dropping with a base loadout of magnum and assault rifle with rare weapons randomly on the map and being able to run at up to 55 kph or more ? Bring it on, in my opinion that would be fantastic.
I mean the thruster packs and Spartan charges as those abilities would annihilate anybody unsuspecting, Spartans in the other halos would be ok but I still think it makes more sense with ODST as they are the only ones in the lore to drop out of pods as often as they do.
The concept is beautiful! But I’d need to be it’s own standalone project, consistently updated. There’s so many neat tools they can play around with. It drives me insane when people talk mad trash on the fact that we’re trying to make Halo, like other games. We’re not saying it needs it, it’s just something a lot of folks want. It will be played, without a doubt!
> 2535442879769873;192:
> Please could we have no battle royale mode.It isnt necessary for a multiplayer game to thrive and almost all games with a battle royale mode are a mess because battle royale in a game leads to easy and definite profit and as a result leads to very little polish as the creators know they dont need to polish the mode because it’ll make money anyways - in short, battle royale in halo would drive away almost all actual halo fans and bring in kids who only play battle royale games - No thank you.
Agreed and the community is actually very small to kill it 
> 2554050324403420;194:
> > 2592250499819446;191:
> > > 2535421570132842;190:
> > > > 2592250499819446;185:
> > > > > 2535421570132842;184:
> > > > > > 2592250499819446;179:
> > > > > > > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;165:
> > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;160:
> > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;155:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;154:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;153:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;152:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;149:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;145:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;143:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I can’t be bothered with this you can’t tell me what the director says is wrong when he’s the one in charge of making halo, they have stated that they will always treat it as a game mode rather than a stand alone game which you cannot grasp so if you seriously can’t take the truth then I cannot be held responsible for your ignorance and if you knew that much about halo you would understand that activision was directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes I don’t know how you don’t know this information?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I know what Frank said. It’s my opinion that a stand alone Halo would be better, that’s what you cannot seem to grasp. It’s also my hope that they do make a stand alone, changes can be made and game studios change too.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Please link where Activision was involved with Halo 4 and 5.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I can grasp it you just don’t understand it as I’m not talking about your “opinion” im talking about fact, also Let me try and explained the Reason activision is involved, activision was in charge on Bungie the original creators of halo but due to the changes activision wanted to incorporate Bungie split from the company and activision put 343 in charge making the whole dilemma activisions fault.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You’re not talking about facts. You’re stating your opinions as facts. Again, you’re of the opinion Activision was involved with Halo, please link where Activision were directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. It did not happen, Activision have never been involved with Halo.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The part about destiny isn’t relevant Bungie splits with Activision, keeps control of Destiny | PC Gamer also can you stop with “YoUr PoStInG YoUr OpiNionS As FaCt” I’m giving information about the game I don’t care much for battle royal but you cannot seem to grasp that they won’t be making a stand alone game but they may make a gamemode. And if you don’t understand that information than there’s nothing I can do to help you.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You’re giving wrong information of the game. Activision has never had anything to do with Halo, not in any way, shape or form, and the part about Destiny is the most relevant thing about it. It’s about Destiny and Activision, NOT Halo and Activision. Also, other forum users have told you the same thing. Again I’ll ask, please link where Activision were directly involved in Halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. What you linked has nothing to do with Activision and Halo. I already stated I don’t care whether it’s a stand alone or add on. If they make a Halo Battle Royale I think a stand alone would be better. The parts about Battle Royale are my opinions, the part about Activision not being involved with Halo is a fact.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It does not prove your point in any way. Bungie and Microsoft had parted ways long before Activision were on the scene. Activision have done nothing to Halo, and you also stated they were directly involved with Halo, they were not. All you’re trying to do is back up your opinion with false info. Back on topic…
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale mode. However, there are players that would like Battle Royale. It’s my hope that they make one in the future. If they make it, I’m not bothered how they do it, either add on or stand alone, but it’s my opinion a stand alone would be better. 1) Players that don’t like it can avoid it. 2) It does not affect another title by replacing another mode. 3) They can dedicate full recources to that game.
> > > > >
> > > > > LAlso I agree that a battle royal would be fun but I disagree with the fact that you can just ignore the game if you don’t like it as it would have to fit in story wise and make sense in the lore otherwise it’s just a game that looks like halo with different gameplay mechanics
> > > >
> > > > You can just ignore it if you don’t like Battle Royale. I already stated I don’t like RTS games like Halo Wars. I’ll admit I bought the first Halo Wars, but I never completed it and I ignored Halo Wars 2 because of the type of game it is. Halo Wars 2 is exactly what you describe, it’s a game that looks like Halo with different gameplay mechanics. It also was made to fit the lore and it can be ignored, I pass on all RTS games. There is no reason a Halo Battle Royale cannot be made to fit the lore too.
> > >
> > > I agree with you about halo wars but you have to at least understand to lore behind the game, this is why I think ODST would work best as they have so much potential atm which could possibly make a battle royal as they make sense in the lore to do something like this but in a training simulation that it. Spartans not so much at the moment as the enhanced mobility given to them in halo 5 would completely ruin gameplay as it would be a matter of who Spartan charges first or ground slams you get the idea. I would be ok with a battle royal existing as long as it doesn’t take away from the main games, doesn’t have a battle pass system and makes sense in the lore.
> >
> > Fair points. However you’re thinking of Spartans as they are in Halo 5. How about a Battle Royale with teams of MK 2 against MK 1, or ODST training against Spartans, or a solo Spartan guarding a sniper or other rare weapons ? There are so many different ways it could work. As for lore, I already said it could be made to fit the lore. Also you say Spartans with enhanced mobility would ruin it ? I would love that, 100 Spartans dropping with a base loadout of magnum and assault rifle with rare weapons randomly on the map and being able to run at up to 55 kph or more ? Bring it on, in my opinion that would be fantastic.
>
> Right, but the thread is asking if Infinite specifically need a Battle Royale, and Infinite is going to be a Master Chief installment. I could see there being a bad -Yoink- Royale Halo lore/theme and play styles, and weapons etc from 343, but that may be bette served in a non Chief installment, like a future release of another ODST style game.
The thread has progressed as most do. If you have read some of my previous posts you’ll know I stated that Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale, on numerous occasions. We’re discussing hypothetical scenarios of how we see a Halo Battle Royale working, either as an add on or a stand alone game.
> 2535421570132842;196:
> > 2592250499819446;191:
> > > 2535421570132842;190:
> > > > 2592250499819446;185:
> > > > > 2535421570132842;184:
> > > > > > 2592250499819446;179:
> > > > > > > 2535421570132842;167:
> > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;165:
> > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;160:
> > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;155:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;154:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;153:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;152:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;149:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535421570132842;145:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2592250499819446;143:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I can’t be bothered with this you can’t tell me what the director says is wrong when he’s the one in charge of making halo, they have stated that they will always treat it as a game mode rather than a stand alone game which you cannot grasp so if you seriously can’t take the truth then I cannot be held responsible for your ignorance and if you knew that much about halo you would understand that activision was directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes I don’t know how you don’t know this information?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I know what Frank said. It’s my opinion that a stand alone Halo would be better, that’s what you cannot seem to grasp. It’s also my hope that they do make a stand alone, changes can be made and game studios change too.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Please link where Activision was involved with Halo 4 and 5.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I can grasp it you just don’t understand it as I’m not talking about your “opinion” im talking about fact, also Let me try and explained the Reason activision is involved, activision was in charge on Bungie the original creators of halo but due to the changes activision wanted to incorporate Bungie split from the company and activision put 343 in charge making the whole dilemma activisions fault.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You’re not talking about facts. You’re stating your opinions as facts. Again, you’re of the opinion Activision was involved with Halo, please link where Activision were directly involved in halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. It did not happen, Activision have never been involved with Halo.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The part about destiny isn’t relevant Bungie splits with Activision, keeps control of Destiny | PC Gamer also can you stop with “YoUr PoStInG YoUr OpiNionS As FaCt” I’m giving information about the game I don’t care much for battle royal but you cannot seem to grasp that they won’t be making a stand alone game but they may make a gamemode. And if you don’t understand that information than there’s nothing I can do to help you.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You’re giving wrong information of the game. Activision has never had anything to do with Halo, not in any way, shape or form, and the part about Destiny is the most relevant thing about it. It’s about Destiny and Activision, NOT Halo and Activision. Also, other forum users have told you the same thing. Again I’ll ask, please link where Activision were directly involved in Halo 4 and 5 which was the main reason for most of the changes. What you linked has nothing to do with Activision and Halo. I already stated I don’t care whether it’s a stand alone or add on. If they make a Halo Battle Royale I think a stand alone would be better. The parts about Battle Royale are my opinions, the part about Activision not being involved with Halo is a fact.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Still you do not understand, that link proved my point if activision hadn’t done what they had done Bungie would still be in charge of halo and not 343 meaning that we wouldn’t have had the changes that 343 made this is my opinion on the matter.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It does not prove your point in any way. Bungie and Microsoft had parted ways long before Activision were on the scene. Activision have done nothing to Halo, and you also stated they were directly involved with Halo, they were not. All you’re trying to do is back up your opinion with false info. Back on topic…
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Halo Infinite does not need a Battle Royale mode. However, there are players that would like Battle Royale. It’s my hope that they make one in the future. If they make it, I’m not bothered how they do it, either add on or stand alone, but it’s my opinion a stand alone would be better. 1) Players that don’t like it can avoid it. 2) It does not affect another title by replacing another mode. 3) They can dedicate full recources to that game.
> > > > >
> > > > > LAlso I agree that a battle royal would be fun but I disagree with the fact that you can just ignore the game if you don’t like it as it would have to fit in story wise and make sense in the lore otherwise it’s just a game that looks like halo with different gameplay mechanics
> > > >
> > > > You can just ignore it if you don’t like Battle Royale. I already stated I don’t like RTS games like Halo Wars. I’ll admit I bought the first Halo Wars, but I never completed it and I ignored Halo Wars 2 because of the type of game it is. Halo Wars 2 is exactly what you describe, it’s a game that looks like Halo with different gameplay mechanics. It also was made to fit the lore and it can be ignored, I pass on all RTS games. There is no reason a Halo Battle Royale cannot be made to fit the lore too.
> > >
> > > I agree with you about halo wars but you have to at least understand to lore behind the game, this is why I think ODST would work best as they have so much potential atm which could possibly make a battle royal as they make sense in the lore to do something like this but in a training simulation that it. Spartans not so much at the moment as the enhanced mobility given to them in halo 5 would completely ruin gameplay as it would be a matter of who Spartan charges first or ground slams you get the idea. I would be ok with a battle royal existing as long as it doesn’t take away from the main games, doesn’t have a battle pass system and makes sense in the lore.
> >
> > Fair points. However you’re thinking of Spartans as they are in Halo 5. How about a Battle Royale with teams of MK 2 against MK 1, or ODST training against Spartans, or a solo Spartan guarding a sniper or other rare weapons ? There are so many different ways it could work. As for lore, I already said it could be made to fit the lore. Also you say Spartans with enhanced mobility would ruin it ? I would love that, 100 Spartans dropping with a base loadout of magnum and assault rifle with rare weapons randomly on the map and being able to run at up to 55 kph or more ? Bring it on, in my opinion that would be fantastic.
>
> I mean the thruster packs and Spartan charges as those abilities would annihilate anybody unsuspecting, Spartans in the other halos would be ok but I still think it makes more sense with ODST as they are the only ones in the lore to drop out of pods as often as they do.
For sure. I’m in agreement that ODST are the only ones that use drop pods, but I also remember Master Chief escaping the Pillar of Autumn on an escape pod in Halo Combat Evolved, there’s another possibility. Spartans could be dropped in fleets of Pelicans, I’m sure Warzone starts like that, I only played a little on release and stopped so I’m not 100%. Then there’s the drop pods that fit in the Pelicans. There are so many possibilities.
Edit. Sorry mods, messed up my quotes.