Call me crazy but I feel if we removed granades, it will allow players to utilize their primary weapon, the br more efficiently and skillfully instead of nading everytime they get shot once or run away. Literally anyone can panic and double nade anyone for a cheap kill.
1 Like
Maybe one nade would be better, but not zero. It’s a part of the “golden triangle” of Halo combat. Gun, melee, nade.
3 Likes
It wouldn’t be Halo…this isn’t the game for you if you don’t believe in the Trinity of shoot, nade, and melee…
1 Like
the trinity exists for a reason. (fire, throw grenade, melee)
if you’re gonna think that’s a “better” thing, iiiiiiimma be real with you,
you’re kinda crazy. think about how people use grenades.
you dont understand how grenades work in halo. it stops people camping in cover so that you can actually shoot them with your weapon.
1 Like
Then call me a heretic, but I no longer welcome the old trinity in ranked.
I’m well aware. I’m not new
I’m well aware you know?
Perhaps one then sure
uuuhh yeah? sooo…why you didnt have second thoughts before posting?
no grenades will make things worse. what you want is swat where grenades are less important.
2 Likes
Maybe just decrease the damage range and fix damage being able to travel through walls and other solid objects.
1 Like
I’m not having second thoughts
the less shield, the better.
Original Post: Click at your own discretion
Summary
Then I don’t welcome your feedback in this game, Go play CoD
1 Like
I don’t play CoD? Be civil man.
Not bad tbh…like yeah
Stay civil mind yall. No ridiculing.
Comp was always good a sucking the fun out of everything.