In BTB
- Nuff said.
Not really, this is a great map, just get rid of the Imperial Walkers for both bases.
the robots have ruined this map
The Mantis does ruin the flow somewhat, it’s just, you can’t really take it down as infantry, you can take the tank out fairly easily from behind, but the Mantis can just turn around and splat you.
i’m not, its the only good BTB map currently available.
How can anyone get sick of Valhalla?
Oh well. Until 343 releases more maps then you’ll just have to either put up with it, quit or find something else to do with your time.
I love the map. I’ll pick it every time it appears until they offer something better.
Yea I never really liked the map to begin with, especially now with DMR sniping.
> How can anyone get sick of Valhalla?
I was sick of it in H3, and I’m still sick of it now.
> > How can anyone get sick of Valhalla?
>
> I was sick of it in H3, and I’m still sick of it now.
this x100000000
this map has been beaten to death.
Apparently the vast majority of voting players disagree with you. (me being on of them)
Ragnarok is the worst -Yoink- ever. How can they bring that map back from H3 because it was a fan favorite? That was not a fan favorite map. Maybe for the -Yoink- kids it was because when I always played H3 50 Tslayer or Snipes everybody ALWAYS veto the map. Nobody ever veto Guardian or The Pit. But I tolerate it since has now turned into a decent map only becuase all of the other maps beside Haven and Solace are really bad.
Probably got to do with the size of the map or the way it’s layed out for travel and long distance shooting. I’d much rather play Vortex or Longbow. Some sweet Dominion type gameplay on those maps. Me likey those more 
Many players actually do agree with you. I played it too much during Halo 3. It had a bit of a novelty factor on day one of playing multiplayer. But, the map quickly got old.
Maybe it would work without the Mantis or the Banshee. Just have one or the other.
Maybe it speaks on 343’s map design that so many players overwhelmingly want to play the only map NOT designed by them. Me, I’ll continue voting for anything other than Ragnarok.
I can’t complain about Ragnarok. Its fairly easy to take down the Mantis if you go at it right.
It’s not even BTB anymore without CTF and Assault anyways.
They could give us BTB-CTF but they don’t seem into it. So focused on mid sized party sizes, so so strange. I am not interested in being worried about the limited maps causing Ragnarok overload until they get serious and bring the Halo standard playlists to play them with. It’s like we got sold a car missing wheels, and we are told we have to wait until the new year to drive the car.
Constant Slayer simply isn’t Halo. To me the whole thing is broken for the moment, so I am not surprised or worried in the slightest about how limiting the experience is. Turning Halo 4 on is limiting.
It will only stand a chance of getting better with DLC. And time.
Time to give us back what we got with every other online Halo ever.
> Ragnarok is the worst Yoink! ever. How can they bring that map back from H3 because it was a fan favorite? That was not a fan favorite map. Maybe for the Yoink! kids it was because when I always played H3 50 Tslayer or Snipes everybody ALWAYS veto the map. Nobody ever veto Guardian or The Pit. But I tolerate it since has now turned into a decent map only becuase all of the other maps beside Haven and Solace are really bad.
Ya know pretty sure it is a fan favorite
And you know why?
Because in halo 3 if your team lost hill
It would take a brain to win the match
Because 7-8 times outa 10
A decent team holding hill would dominate.
I disagree, I think Ragnarok is the best map in the game. I agree with the other posters though that Valhalla was better because static weapon spawns created more opportunity to use map control as a strategy. In Ragnarok, map control is still relevant, but that whole aspect has been dumbed down a lot (in Halo 4 in general).
> > Ragnarok is the worst Yoink! ever. How can they bring that map back from H3 because it was a fan favorite? That was not a fan favorite map. Maybe for the Yoink! kids it was because when I always played H3 50 Tslayer or Snipes everybody ALWAYS veto the map. Nobody ever veto Guardian or The Pit. But I tolerate it since has now turned into a decent map only becuase all of the other maps beside Haven and Solace are really bad.
>
> Ya know pretty sure it is a fan favorite
> And you know why?
>
> Because in halo 3 if your team lost hill
> It would take a brain to win the match
> Because 7-8 times outa 10
> A decent team holding hill would dominate.
http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Halo3/Default.aspx?player=xxI+Valkeri+Ixx&sg=1
Thanks for proving my point.
> I disagree, I think Ragnarok is the best map in the game. I agree with the other posters though that Valhalla was better because static weapon spawns created more opportunity to use map control as a strategy. In Ragnarok, map control is still relevant, but that whole aspect has been dumbed down a lot (in Halo 4 in general).
Your comment is invalid http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Halo3/Default.aspx?player=Zombie+Lawyer&sg=1