What happened 343i? Did you not see all the criticism and negative Bungie got after creating Reach? For Halo 4 you might as well take the word “Halo” out of the title unless there is going to be classic playlists, REAL classic playlists unlike the ones that came out for Reach. The old school casual players and competitive players are most likely going to disband from this game after a month just because you guys are trying to satisfy the call of duty nubs.
Frankie said we are reading the new information “out of context” and to me that just sounds like him trying to calm everyone down with BS because he was expecting a negative reaction. Reach was a terrible game and I’ve been playing Halo ever since CE came out. Halo CE, Halo 2, and Halo 3 to a certain extent were good games that had a Halo FEEL to them. I am probably going to get a negative reaction or some smart -Yoink- saying “you haven’t played the game yet so how do you know” but I felt Reach was going to be bad before it came out, the competitive community felt that way too after the drop off from Halo 3.
Halo 4 is going to need full customization, the customization Reach never had and it would probably need a wide variety of playlists to satisfy everyone. Halo 2 and Halo 3 had multiplayer success because they were their own game, not Call of Duty. Halo was never broken, so why try and fix it by making it CoD?
In b4 tl;dr
in b4 wall of text
in b4 mad fanboy
in b4 don’t like don’t play
> What happened 343i? Did you not see all the criticism and negative Bungie got after creating Reach? For Halo 4 you might as well take the word “Halo” out of the title unless there is going to be classic playlists, REAL classic playlists unlike the ones that came out for Reach. The old school casual players and competitive players are most likely going to disband from this game after a month just because you guys are trying to satisfy the call of duty nubs.
>
> Frankie said we are reading the new information “out of context” and to me that just sounds like him trying to calm everyone down with BS because he was expecting a negative reaction. Reach was a terrible game and I’ve been playing Halo ever since CE came out. Halo CE, Halo 2, and Halo 3 to a certain extent were good games that had a Halo FEEL to them. I am probably going to get a negative reaction or some smart -Yoink!- saying “you haven’t played the game yet so how do you know” but I felt Reach was going to be bad before it came out, the competitive community felt that way too after the drop off from Halo 3.
>
> Halo 4 is going to need full customization, the customization Reach never had and it would probably need a wide variety of playlists to satisfy everyone. Halo 2 and Halo 3 had multiplayer success because they were their own game, not Call of Duty. Halo was never broken, so why try and fix it by making it CoD?
>
> In b4 tl;dr
> in b4 wall of text
> in b4 mad fanboy
> in b4 don’t like don’t play
yet another post about a game that you haven’t played yet.
Where are you people coming from everyone who post something along these lines has under 20 or 10 post and i don’t care I’m going to say it anyways don’t like what you see don’t buy it it’s a simple solution passed down from generation to generation.
> Where are you people coming from everyone who post something along these lines has under 20 or 10 post and i don’t care I’m going to say it anyways don’t like what you see don’t buy it it’s a simple solution passed down from generation to generation.
> > ‘If it’s close to perfection, improve’
>
> Halo 3: Great game
> Halo Reach: Added Features that broke the game
> Halo 4: Added Features that Broke Reach, and ignore Halo 3 Forumla
>
> This is why were pissed.
> > ‘If it’s close to perfection, improve’
>
> Halo 3: Great game
> Halo Reach: Added Features that broke the game
> Halo 4: Added Features that Broke Reach, and ignore Halo 3 Forumla
>
> This is why were pissed.
> > ‘If it’s close to perfection, improve’
>
> Halo 3: Great game
> Halo Reach: Added Features that broke the game
> Halo 4: Added Features that Broke Reach, and ignore Halo 3 Forumla
>
> This is why were pissed.
but whoses to say they work the same way. I am waiting until E3 when we will most likey get some good gameplay
I don’t want a classic playlist… I want a classic game. Halo 2 and Halo 3 didn’t have a classic playlist because THEY DIDN’T NEED IT! They were great games, one playlist won’t save this game they just need to gut all the stupid gimmicks, and go back to classic halo.
I’m not gonna bother to fight you, because obviously you have no clue. Reach wasn’t terrible but it wasn’t good. And you haven’t played the game, nobody has. Change is good, most people adjusted to Reach. And since they don’t have “classic” gameplay then there need’s to be a classic playlist.
> I don’t want a classic playlist… I want a classic game. Halo 2 and Halo 3 didn’t have a classic playlist because THEY DIDN’T NEED IT! They were great games, one playlist won’t save this game they just need to gut all the stupid gimmicks, and go back to classic halo.
Too bad they won’t go back all these things are being kept in so tell me…are you mad bro?
> > ‘If it’s close to perfection, improve’
>
> Halo 3: Great game
> Halo Reach: Added Features that broke the game
> Halo 4: Added Features that Broke Reach, and ignore Halo 3 Forumla
>
> This is why were pissed.
I understand that, but don’t you think that some of the new features are worthy to be improved? It’s not a good idea to throw out a half-done recipe for a perfect pizza, just saying.
