If IGN or any site gave Halo 4 a 10...

If Halo 4 got a 10/10 or a 5/5 from any of the various, well known gaming sites, would you all say that it was paid for?

A lot of people love to say that whenever a CoD game scores over a 9 (pretty much most of them)it is paid for. However, I’ve always wondered if people would keep their same logic if a game they liked got such a high score.

So what will it be? Halo 4 comes out and gets a 10/10…heck, even a 9.5. Was it paid for? Or are you going to ignore all of the logic you throw upon “undeserving reviews” and say that a 9.5/10 is what H4 deserves?

Game reviewers by and large are biased or paid so I wouldn’t trust any of the rankings they give. That being said I’m sure halo 4 will get a 9+.

People who think IGN get paid to give high ratings are, well, I can’t even think of a suitable word so we’ll just say silly.

Websites like IGN are extremely biased because they don’t get a lot of hands on time with the game to give it a full review, until they’ve played every Campaign level on all difficulties, all the Multiplayer levels on every game mode and played through the first season of Spartan Ops, then their rating should mean absolutely nothing and technically, it does mean absolutely nothing.

a lot of sites sometimes do a recall on their scoring. after the new game scent is worn off. i wouldnt doubt seeing that happen for 4

I don’t care about the overall score, I care about the actual review, you know, the words?

It depends on the magazine on whether it’s biased/payed or not, Electronic Gaming Monthly is pretty trustworthy.

COD would never get a 10 because it’s not innovative in any way.

> People who think IGN get paid to give high ratings are, well, I can’t even think of a suitable word so we’ll just say silly.
>
> Websites like IGN are extremely biased because they don’t get a lot of hands on time with the game to give it a full review, until they’ve played every Campaign level on all difficulties, all the Multiplayer levels on every game mode and played through the first season of Spartan Ops, then their rating should mean absolutely nothing and technically, it does mean absolutely nothing.

Which is why I don’t go by what these game rating websites like IGN have to say about the game. Although, they did give Arkham Asylum and Arkham City good ratings, and I would agree with them there.=/

> COD would never get a 10 because it’s not innovative in any way.

Black ops 2 looks very promising. I wouldn’t be shocked if it got a 9.5.

I aboslutly DESPISE Game Rating companies, they’re too biased and if COD gets a high rating like a 9 then I get the sense that they were paid or they just don’t know a Terrible game series is when they see it, just imagine the hipocrisy of IGN giving Black Ops 2 a 9.5 after making it Number 5 in the worst games shown at E3…

> I aboslutly DESPISE Game Rating companies, they’re too biased and if COD gets a high rating like a 9 then I get the sense that they were paid or they just don’t know a Terrible game series is when they see it…

See that right there is what I’m talking about. Call of Duty isn’t terrible franchise. Each installment provides great gameplay and is really fun. You say that if it gets a good score, it’s paid…yet you’re probably the first one to say that Halo 4 deserves no less than a 10. I just don’t get it.

I wouldn’t say paid for, but there’s always bias when a popular franchise is getting scored and Halo’s no stranger to that.

Game reviewers have no idea what they’re talking about for the most part, so I usually tend to ignore them and not care what they rate a game. If anyone takes game rating seriously, well… that’s good for them.

If they don’t play the game at home for fun – Then its likely they have no idea what is good or bad and, what HALO FANS want in a game …

I can make my personal review when I get my hands on the game!

im my opinion there is no movie, game etc that i can rate 10/10 no matter how good it is 9 is the highest i can give.

It’ll probably get a 9 or higher

Well they gave Halo Reach a 9.5 I believe, and I don’t think it deserves that high of a rating. On the other hand, I do think Halo 3 deserves a 10/10… with that being said we’re talking about somebodies subjective opinion that is as worthy as yours or mine… the fact that Gladiator got dismal ratings from movies sites proves that the people who get to see the movies/video games first and rate them are a bunch of nobodies.

Game review sites operate on a tight schedule. They usually don’t have enough time to fully appreciate games, just to take a quick spin through the campaign on the easiest difficultly, try out a bit of co-op, and hop in and out of a few multiplayer matches. Thus, most reviews will be - well, not biased, but limited in scope.

I dislike people claiming that game reviewers were paid to give certain games a good score. It is fairly obvious when people make these claims just because of fanboyish hatred for other game franchises. While it’s possible that game reviewers are paid to give good reviews, most usually don’t accept bribes, and even if they do it’s usually easy to make out the bias.

So if Halo 4 gets a 10, I wouldn’t say it’s biased or bribery or whatever. From what footage I have seen so far, it looks as though it deserves a 9 and above. Despite my reservations towards a certain game series, I have to admit that Black Ops 2 may also be deserving of a relatively high score.

Halo 4 HAS to get a 9/10 on IGN at least, it just has to. Or else the series is doomed.

metacritic is the only real source of reviews I count…