SO I have seen all the -Yoink- storm that ensued from the GI info. I can honestly care less if it’s true, I can’t judge a game I haven’t tried, but I want to ask you all something.
Why do you want a “Halo” game? why do you want the same exact thing over and over again? why do you want to pay for something you have already played before?
Me? for one, I want to get my money’s worth when I pay for a game, so if this new halo is a straight carbon copy of CoD, but manage to make it fun, I’ll gladly pay for it.
You don’t know how fun, or competitive this game is, you are thinking of how this game is not “Halo”, and maybe it’s not, but what makes you all so sure it won’t be fun or competitive?
> Me? for one, I want to get my money’s worth when I pay for a game, so if this new halo is a straight carbon copy of CoD, but manage to make it fun, I’ll gladly pay for it.
You dont want to play the same Halo game; yet you’d be perfectly happy with a Halo game that is a carbon copy of COD?
Are you mentally slow? How exactly does that make sense?
I want classic Halo because I am buying a game with Halo in the title. If you want to shoehorn new things into Halo, make a new series.
Even the title ‘Halo 4’ implies an update, not an entire uprooting of what Halo was.
You don’t think a Halo game should copy the older Halo games, but would happily buy a Halo game that plays exactly like CoD? What kind of logic is that?
I know it won’t be better than the older Halo games because it simply has added to what Reach did, strayed way too far from the roots of what made Halo great in the first place. Could it be a good game in it’s own right? Sure. Reach was. Will it be a great game like CE and H2 was? I have massive doubts.
You asked why I want the same thing over and over again. I told you I want innovation. Most people want change, but not change that randomizes gameplay