I honestly really like how Halo 5 looks. It looks much more competitive, faster pasted, and generally a good time.
The new gamemodes really help too.
Giving praise on a promise is not a good thing to do.
> 2533274858862740;1:
> I honestly really like how Halo 5 looks. It looks much more competitive, faster pasted, and generally a good time.
> The new gamemodes really help too.
>
Yeah. It does look Faster Pastedā¦
> 2533274827777640;2:
> Giving praise on a promise is not a good thing to do.
Guess weāll soon find out if it deserves the praise. 
This game does look like the most competitive Halo game yet Iām interested to see how this will play out
Praising halo 4 worked out so well before launchā¦
> 2533274898131165;6:
> Praising halo 4 worked out so well before launchā¦
Your point? 2, 3, and Reach were all praised before launch, and they all have great to fantastic multiplayers.
> 2535466383778942;7:
> > 2533274898131165;6:
> > Praising halo 4 worked out so well before launchā¦
>
>
> Your point? 2, 3, and Reach were all praised before launch, and they all have great to fantastic multiplayers.
Each of them received large amounts of critique after release, and many people would argue that each was worse than the previous. There has never been a time in the history of Halo where the next one would have been almost unanimously considered better than the previous one.
> 2533274858862740;1:
> I honestly really like how Halo 5 looks. It looks much more competitive, faster pasted, and generally a good time.
> The new gamemodes really help too.
>
I feel the same way!
> 2533274825830455;8:
> > 2535466383778942;7:
> > > 2533274898131165;6:
> > > Praising halo 4 worked out so well before launchā¦
> >
> >
> >
> > Your point? 2, 3, and Reach were all praised before launch, and they all have great to fantastic multiplayers.
>
>
> Each of them received large amounts of critique after release, and many people would argue that each was worse than the previous. There has never been a time in the history of Halo where the next one would have been almost unanimously considered better than the previous one.
Yeah, but at the end of the day, people still say that they all had solid multiplayers. Many people still, to this day, over two years since 4ās release and multiple patches ridicule 4ās multiplayer and call it the worst multiplayer in any Halo, ever. Thatās the difference - the large majority of Halo fans think that 2, 3, and Reachās multiplayer were, at the very least, decent. The same cannot be said for 4.
> 2533274827777640;2:
> Giving praise on a promise is not a good thing to do.
Same as bashing a game before it is played.
> 2535432369599366;11:
> > 2533274827777640;2:
> > Giving praise on a promise is not a good thing to do.
>
>
>
> Same as bashing a game before it is played.
Unless there is constructive criticism. We have seen +30 videos of the game, it is perfectly logical to express disdain for some of the mechanics and features from it.
> 2535432369599366;11:
> > 2533274827777640;2:
> > Giving praise on a promise is not a good thing to do.
>
>
> Same as bashing a game before it is played.
Not at all. The former is setting yourself up for failure.
> 2535466383778942;10:
> > 2533274825830455;8:
> > > 2535466383778942;7:
> > > > 2533274898131165;6:
> > > > Praising halo 4 worked out so well before launchā¦
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your point? 2, 3, and Reach were all praised before launch, and they all have great to fantastic multiplayers.
> >
> >
> >
> > Each of them received large amounts of critique after release, and many people would argue that each was worse than the previous. There has never been a time in the history of Halo where the next one would have been almost unanimously considered better than the previous one.
>
>
> Yeah, but at the end of the day, people still say that they all had solid multiplayers. Many people still, to this day, over two years since 4ās release and multiple patches ridicule 4ās multiplayer and call it the worst multiplayer in any Halo, ever. Thatās the difference - the large majority of Halo fans think that 2, 3, and Reachās multiplayer were, at the very least, decent. The same cannot be said for 4.
As far as I know, there is still a large amount of players who think Reach was far from solid. When it comes to Halo 2 and 3, there simply arenāt enough people left here to tell you how much problems they had. The people who thought Halo 2 was absolute junk when it released most likely still think itās absolute junk. The only reason you donāt see them is that if they thought Halo 2 was really bad, they probably didnāt manage to suffer through the following games. They arenāt here to tell their opinion. What you can hear nowadays are the filtered opinions of people who thought these games were good enough. All the āHalo 2 sucksā, āHalo 3 sucksā, āHalo Reach sucksā statements are slowly forgotten because the people who hold those opinions arenāt around to tell them.
The reality of it is, there will be a day when the large majority of fans still around will say Halo 4 was at least decent. Old fans leave, new fans come, and the popular opinion changes. Thatās how it goes, and thatās the only reason you see almost no one criticizing Halo 2 or 3.
I also really like what weāve seen so far, and canāt wait to get my hands on it and get an actual opinion