Honestly, i personally think it has one of the most interesting and diverse mutiplayers out of any of the halo’s.
I love being able to change my style of play at anytime.
May not be the most liked halo, but it’s one of my favorites.
Halo Reach and COD or Battlefield are the FPS kings if you ask me. Whereas The Elder Scrolls dominates RPG. I know all of you Reach-Haters hate change, but it had to be or Halo’s style would decay. I am just curious 1) about Bungie’s new game and 2) Halo 4’s degree of change. Everyone is saying the same thing. 343 will have to change without ruing the feel. I’m not convinced
> I know all of you Reach-Haters hate change, but it had to be or Halo’s style would decay.
No. This is simply wrong. Look at the current populations for MW2, Black Ops, and MW3. All are significantly higher than reaches population and they’re all basically the same game. Halo didn’t need to change and still doesn’t, it needs to go back to the simple gameplay that made Halo CE and Halo 2 great.
> > I know all of you Reach-Haters hate change, but it had to be or Halo’s style would decay.
>
> No. This is simply wrong. Look at the current populations for MW2, Black Ops, and MW3. All are significantly higher than reaches population and they’re all basically the same game. Halo didn’t need to change and still doesn’t, it needs to go back to the simple gameplay that made Halo CE and Halo 2 great.
there popular because of how cosual they are, they couldn’t give -Yoink- if its the same gameplay every time most are around 11-15 anyway and just want to have some fun with there friends
> > I know all of you Reach-Haters hate change, but it had to be or Halo’s style would decay.
>
> No. This is simply wrong. Look at the current populations for MW2, Black Ops, and MW3. All are significantly higher than reaches population and they’re all basically the same game. Halo didn’t need to change and still doesn’t, it needs to go back to the simple gameplay that made Halo CE and Halo 2 great.
the call of duty games are popular because of how casual they are, they couldn’t give -Yoink- if its the same gameplay every time most are around 11-15 anyway and just want to have some fun with there friends
> > > I know all of you Reach-Haters hate change, but it had to be or Halo’s style would decay.
> >
> > No. This is simply wrong. Look at the current populations for MW2, Black Ops, and MW3. All are significantly higher than reaches population and they’re all basically the same game. Halo didn’t need to change and still doesn’t, it needs to go back to the simple gameplay that made Halo CE and Halo 2 great.
>
> the call of duty games are popular because of how casual they are, they couldn’t give Yoink! if its the same gameplay every time most are around 11-15 anyway and just want to have some fun with there friends
Halo Reach is easily the most casual Halo title to date, and look at it’s population.
Reach playlists:
Action Sack
Squad Action Sack
Arena Action Sack
Doubles Action Sack
Big Team Action Sack
Yep, very diverse.
> > > > I know all of you Reach-Haters hate change, but it had to be or Halo’s style would decay.
> > >
> > > No. This is simply wrong. Look at the current populations for MW2, Black Ops, and MW3. All are significantly higher than reaches population and they’re all basically the same game. Halo didn’t need to change and still doesn’t, it needs to go back to the simple gameplay that made Halo CE and Halo 2 great.
> >
> > the call of duty games are popular because of how casual they are, they couldn’t give Yoink! if its the same gameplay every time most are around 11-15 anyway and just want to have some fun with there friends
>
> Halo Reach is easily the most casual Halo title to date, and look at it’s population.
yes but argubly call of duty is also more easily accesable among other factors