You see i was introduced to halo (and first person shooters) with halo 3 i had never liked shooters before.but when i played this the gameplay wasent just how did i die? It was actually fun,i played a few multiplayer games and then i discovered something called forge
I could build anything i wanted…
And all my attention was poured into halo forge1.0.never touched multiplayer again.
But then reach came out,so first i played on forge and then i poured all my attention into reach multiplayer,it was fun,but very frustrating at times,i diden’t like the dmr and all the maps were all grey and i coulden’t tell if im just colourblind,i got to cournal and then occasionally played online.saw halo 4 multiplayer trailer and decided i wanted to try 3’s multiplayer just so i could compare the style to reach and halo 4.
All i can say is wow…
How could bungie make reach terrible compared to halo 3
Halo 3 multiplayer is balanced,the br is great,much cooler guns and better maps
(i would gladly welcome halo 4 sprint if they change flow and larger sizes of maps accordingly as sometimes you had to take a stroll across the map to get into the fight and if shields drain and health lowers)
Please make halo 4 a sequel to not only 3 storywise,but gameplay wise too.
> I guess they wanted to make something diffrent, and they did. The game is decent, it has its bad sides and good sides.
>
> Bungie have never owed us anything.
They owed us a great last halo game, that never happened…
Reach isn’t a bad game…on its own…
but for a Halo game, it is complete and utter -Yoink-, and that is why Halo needs to go back to H2-3 multiplayer.
Bungie’s Halo went out with a bang, but it was a bang that destroyed the Halo feel, and hopefully 343i can revive True Halo, which is very unlikely, but a man can dream can’t he?
> > I guess they wanted to make something diffrent, and they did. The game is decent, it has its bad sides and good sides.
> >
> > Bungie have never owed us anything.
>
> They owed us a great last halo game, that never happened…
>
> Reach isn’t a bad game…on its own…
>
> but for a Halo game, it is complete and utter Yoink!, and that is why Halo needs to go back to H2-3 multiplayer.
>
> Bungie’s Halo went out with a bang, but it was a bang that destroyed the Halo feel, and hopefully 343i can revive True Halo, which is very unlikely, but a man can dream can’t he?
343 brought hope with Halo 4, hope that we will get a game that is truly a Halo, yet some people already hate it. I believe in 343i, and have huge exceptations towards the new Halo game. Hope all this waiting and speculating have been worth it.
Halo 3’s multiplayer has the worst multiplayer. I still play Halo PC, Halo 2 on XBC and of course Halo Reach. They are all more fun, more competitive and more balanced than Halo 3’s multiplayer. Even the campaign was pretty bad, it was way too hasty. After Halo CE and Halo 2 I really expected something better.
And how is Reach too gray? Ever played Halo: CE? That’s really gray, the remakes of those maps in Halo Reach look awesome and colourfull. Ok, forge is gray, but so what? Sandbox is only brown, nobody complains about that.
> Halo 3’s multiplayer has the worst multiplayer. I still play Halo PC, Halo 2 on XBC and of course Halo Reach. They are all more fun, more competitive and more balanced than Halo 3’s multiplayer. Even the campaign was pretty bad, it was way too hasty. After Halo CE and Halo 2 I really expected something better.
>
> And how is Reach too gray? Ever played Halo: CE? That’s really gray, the remakes of those maps in Halo Reach look awesome and colourfull. Ok, forge is gray, but so what? Sandbox is only brown, nobody complains about that./My opinion
> > Halo 3’s multiplayer has the worst multiplayer. I still play Halo PC, Halo 2 on XBC and of course Halo Reach. They are all more fun, more competitive and more balanced than Halo 3’s multiplayer. Even the campaign was pretty bad, it was way too hasty. After Halo CE and Halo 2 I really expected something better.
> >
> > And how is Reach too gray? Ever played Halo: CE? That’s really gray, the remakes of those maps in Halo Reach look awesome and colourfull. Ok, forge is gray, but so what? Sandbox is only brown, nobody complains about that./My opinion
>
> Fixed
That’s just spam… Of course it’s an opinion, just like this topic is an opinion.
> Halo 3’s multiplayer has the Best multiplayer. I still play Halo PC, Halo 2 on XBC and of course Halo Reach. Only halo 2 ismore competitive and more balanced than Halo 3’s multiplayer. Even the campaign was pretty good, it was awsome. After Halo CE and Halo 2 I really expected something like halo 3.
>
> And how is Reach too gray? Ever played Halo: CE? That’s really gray, the remakes of those maps in Halo Reach look boring and dull. Ok, forge is gray, but so what? Sandbox is only brown, nobody complains about that.
> Halo 3’s multiplayer has the worst multiplayer. I still play Halo PC, Halo 2 on XBC and of course Halo Reach. They are all more fun, more competitive and more balanced than Halo 3’s multiplayer. Even the campaign was pretty bad, it was way too hasty. After Halo CE and Halo 2 I really expected something better.
>
> And how is Reach too gray? Ever played Halo: CE? That’s really gray, the remakes of those maps in Halo Reach look awesome and colourfull. Ok, forge is gray, but so what? Sandbox is only brown, nobody complains about that.
Unfortunatly the majority of maps now are forge designed so yeah there pretty grey,and i never played two so yeah they probobly are better
Halo 2/3 With BR = Spamming Noobs with overpowered fun gun, DMR in Reach equals Dull but balanced gun. PS: Halo 2 MP is boring, fun but dull unless your a “Pro”
Reach is still quite fun, I’ve never really cared much for the competitive scene since I only like playing games for fun. I guess when you play without a care in the world whether you die a lot or not, you kind of see what is good about it.
Heresy?