> > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> >
> > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> >
> > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
>
> why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> or, so people claim.
because it doesnt. Armor lock has always been a joke, people that use it lose the power of maneuvering, you can barely maintain powerweapons, and unless you have heavy team support youre bound to die in a dmr battle. I almost never use it, I only used it to get the achievement for it, also: It can slow a spawn kill with its antivechicle capabilities, but it does hardly anything else but annoy prospecting 5 shotters.
> > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > >
> > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > >
> > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> >
> > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > or, so people claim.
>
> because it doesnt. Armor lock has always been a joke, people that use it lose the power of maneuvering, you can barely maintain powerweapons, and unless you have heavy team support youre bound to die in a dmr battle. I almost never use it, I only used it to get the achievement for it, also: It can slow a spawn kill with its antivechicle capabilities, but it does hardly anything else but annoy prospecting 5 shotters.
exactly.
> > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> >
> > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> >
> > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
>
> why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> or, so people claim.
Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > >
> > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > >
> > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> >
> > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > or, so people claim.
>
> Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
Define exploit.
> > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > >
> > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > >
> > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> >
> > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > or, so people claim.
>
> Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
but, a part of being a good player is to abuse anything that can be abused to gain an advantage, if armour lock is so easily abused then why aren’t you abusing it?
it may feall better to kill without using it but you can’t kill when using armour lock because armour lock makes you immobile.
> > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > >
> > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > >
> > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > >
> > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > or, so people claim.
> >
> > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
>
> Define exploit.
i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
> > > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > > >
> > > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > > >
> > > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > > >
> > > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > > or, so people claim.
> > >
> > > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> >
> > Define exploit.
>
> i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
> in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
but you aren’t exploiting the armour ability…
> > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > >
> > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > >
> > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > >
> > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > or, so people claim.
> >
> > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
>
> but, a part of being a good player is to abuse anything that can be abused to gain an advantage, if armour lock is so easily abused then why aren’t you abusing it?
>
> it may feall better to kill without using it but you can’t kill when using armour lock because armour lock makes you immobile.
then i am not that good 
i mean i dont play for real money so i have no interest in abusing something i dont like
> > > > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > > > >
> > > > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > > > or, so people claim.
> > > >
> > > > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > > > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> > >
> > > Define exploit.
> >
> > i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
> > in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
>
> but you aren’t exploiting the armour ability…
read again.
note that this is MY opinion
> > > > > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > > > > or, so people claim.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > > > > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> > > >
> > > > Define exploit.
> > >
> > > i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
> > > in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
> >
> > but you aren’t exploiting the armour ability…
>
> read again.
> note that this is MY opinion
but your opinion is faulty.
> > > > > > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > > > > > or, so people claim.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > > > > > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> > > > >
> > > > > Define exploit.
> > > >
> > > > i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
> > > > in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
> > >
> > > but you aren’t exploiting the armour ability…
> >
> > read again.
> > note that this is MY opinion
>
> but your opinion is faulty.
how can an opinion about something be faulty?
i know you use AL and you like it and you dont see a problem with it.
that is alright but why am i wrong just because i differ from your opinion?
> > > > > > > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > > > > > > or, so people claim.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > > > > > > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Define exploit.
> > > > >
> > > > > i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
> > > > > in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
> > > >
> > > > but you aren’t exploiting the armour ability…
> > >
> > > read again.
> > > note that this is MY opinion
> >
> > but your opinion is faulty.
>
> how can an opinion about something be faulty?
> i know you use AL and you like it and you dont see a problem with it.
> that is alright but why am i wrong just because i differ from your opinion?
but using the armour ability normally (pressing the button) isn’t exploiting it.
i never said i use armour lock, i despise that armour ability myself and think that it’s bad for gameplay but the main point most people make that “it helps bad players kill good players” is totally -Yoink-.
> > > > > > > > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > > > > > > > or, so people claim.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > > > > > > > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Define exploit.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
> > > > > > in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
> > > > >
> > > > > but you aren’t exploiting the armour ability…
> > > >
> > > > read again.
> > > > note that this is MY opinion
> > >
> > > but your opinion is faulty.
> >
> > how can an opinion about something be faulty?
> > i know you use AL and you like it and you dont see a problem with it.
> > that is alright but why am i wrong just because i differ from your opinion?
>
> but using the armour ability normally (pressing the button) isn’t exploiting it.
i did write that this is MY opinion. i see it like this: using armor lock is exploiting this AA.
now you just come along and write “no that isnt exploiting it”
youre pretty good at just ignoring the parts i already highlighted.
> i never said i use armour lock, i despise that armour ability myself and think that it’s bad for gameplay but the main point most people make that “it helps bad players kill good players” is totally -Yoink!-.
i gave you examples and tried to explain why AL is decreasing the skill gap.
if you can not understand them or if you do not want to understand my points i can not do much about it.
> > > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > > >
> > > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > > >
> > > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > > >
> > > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > > or, so people claim.
> > >
> > > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> >
> > Define exploit.
>
> i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
> in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
then why did come back and repost if you felt you had said all you need to say?
> > > > > > > > > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > > > > > > > > or, so people claim.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > > > > > > > > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Define exploit.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
> > > > > > > in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but you aren’t exploiting the armour ability…
> > > > >
> > > > > read again.
> > > > > note that this is MY opinion
> > > >
> > > > but your opinion is faulty.
> > >
> > > how can an opinion about something be faulty?
> > > i know you use AL and you like it and you dont see a problem with it.
> > > that is alright but why am i wrong just because i differ from your opinion?
> >
> > but using the armour ability normally (pressing the button) isn’t exploiting it.
>
> i did write that this is MY opinion. i see it like this: using armor lock is exploiting this AA.
> now you just come along and write “no that isnt exploiting it”
> youre pretty good at just ignoring the parts i already highlighted.
ok then.
by this logic, anyone who use an armour ability normally is exploiting it.
> > i never said i use armour lock, i despise that armour ability myself and think that it’s bad for gameplay but the main point most people make that “it helps bad players kill good players” is totally -Yoink!-.
>
> i gave you examples and tried to explain why AL is decreasing the skill gap.
> if you can not understand them or if you do not want to understand my points i can not do much about it.
so a player failing to adapt to new situations is reducing the skill gap?
more like showing how much players rely on one style of play.
> > > > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > > > >
> > > > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > > > or, so people claim.
> > > >
> > > > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > > > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> > >
> > > Define exploit.
> >
> > i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
> > in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
>
> then why did come back and repost if you felt you had said all you need to say?
i felt guilty since i was annoying haunted to answer my questions so i made another statement.
but as i read his last post i see he simply does not want to understand what i write.
im done now mister plunderfull.
> > My contention is and always has been that it can be exploited,yet has had the noob finger pointed at it,not so for other game exploits.Your first post had 2 major points,1 it delays the game,2 it can only be mindlessly applied to wich I responded does sprint delay the game and are you saying there is no way to skillfully use AL.After that you began a non sequiter fest of post about equipment pickups and simplistic uses for AL,I sir have stuck to your original argument while you have started injecting information not pertinent to the argument.(are you related to my wife?thats a joke.you will get that in a decade or so.)
>
> The entire argument, simplified:
>
>
>
> > Me: “Difference why people stuck to/took advantage of an ‘OP’ gun like the BR for so much time is because there is a difference in ‘skill-gap’ aka the gun’s deadly nature varies by expertise. With Armor Lock, there isn’t such a skill gap with simply tapping LB. AL slows down gameplay and simply using it doesn’t make it any better”
> >
> > You: “So sprinting doesn’t slow down gameplay?” (only argues the last point made)
> >
> > Me: " I never said Sprinting, or any armor ability doesn’t slow down gameplay. They’d all be pickups and that’d be ideal."
> >
> > You: “So you basically want Halo 3?”
> >
> > Me: “In some cases. But just because something needs to be based off an older model doesn’t make it bad. New isn’t better”
> >
> > You: “… You never addressed Sprint. Also, there is more than mindlessly pressing a button” (I DID address Sprint…)
> >
> > Me: “…yes I did… also: while things like Sprint slow down gameplay, it isn’t nearly as bad as AL because people remain vulnerable and there is a counter other than waiting. Also, pressing LB in the face of danger doesn’t require the utmost amount of skill or intellect, just the basic knowledge of timing. All abilities are incredibly simplistic”
> >
> > You: “I didn’t ask about any of that…” (“So sprinting doesn’t slow down gameplay?” “AL is more than mindlessly pressing a button” Yes you did… )
> >
> > Me: insert highlighted references to the answers of your previously asked questions “You asked this question, I answered it here. Are you not reading my full post? Also, whenever I make a series of points, you only refer to one of the many points or you respond to an older, buried argument”
> >
> > You: “No U. I simply asked about two points: AL being mindless, and Sprint and you can’t answer it” (I DID answer it and you have yet to recognize that I did.
> >
> > Me talking about all AAs being pickups on maps is COMPLETELY relevant because you tried to defend AL by throwing another AA (Sprint) under the bus, so I responded by saying that they are all crap unless there are only a few to be picked up and be fought over instead of started with, then gameplay wouldn’t be slowed down. )
That is the entire argument<mark>simpified</mark>to show your side of the argument,it cuts out relevant statements that you made that validate what I have said,all AA delay the game and help each player kill and gain advantage over his opponent,not just AL.Each AA can be used with a high degree of skill,not just sprint.To kill your opponent and not be killed is the point of this game and almost all FPS,manipulation of the parameters of the game is a certinty by good players who wish to have advantage over their opponent,the strange phenomenon is the hate for a game parameter that has been in play for a year now and continues to be beat into everbodies head by a vocal minority.
> > > > > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > > > > or, so people claim.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > > > > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> > > >
> > > > Define exploit.
> > >
> > > i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
> > > in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
> >
> > then why did come back and repost if you felt you had said all you need to say?
>
> i felt guilty since i was annoying haunted to answer my questions so i made another statement.
> but as i read his last post i see he simply does not want to understand what i write.
> im done now mister plunderfull.
understand what?..
> > > > > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > > > > or, so people claim.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > > > > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> > > >
> > > > Define exploit.
> > >
> > > i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
> > > in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
> >
> > then why did come back and repost if you felt you had said all you need to say?
>
> i felt guilty since i was annoying haunted to answer my questions so i made another statement.
> but as i read his last post i see he simply does not want to understand what i write.
> im done now mister plunderfull.
Please call me plundy LOL and you are correct haunted is a tough nut to crack,hang in there though you might find that you like him despite his opposing veiw and ability to post until you fall asleep at your computer.
> > > > > > > > I haven’t read any of this thread except for the OP.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My answer is player integrity. People know a lot of tactics that are too powerful, unfair, etc. But some people simply believe (myself included) that implementing those tactics into their play style is simply wrong. It’s the “do unto others as you would have them do” mentality. If you HATE armor lock with the burning rage of a thousand suns, why in the world would you use it? You’re against everything it stands for, you’re not going to sell yourself out by supporting its usage.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Some people think it’s ok to use and will use it no matter what the situation is. That’s their opinion and choice.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > why not use it when it gives you such a big advantage by the press of a button?
> > > > > > > or, so people claim.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also for me it feels so much better to kill enemies (especially ALs) without exploiting the AA.
> > > > > > Although the enemy decreased the skill gap i was still better than him.
> > > > >
> > > > > Define exploit.
> > > >
> > > > i think i already stated often enough that for me AL is completely missplaced
> > > > in a shooter so in my point of view using it normally already is exploiting it.
> > >
> > > then why did come back and repost if you felt you had said all you need to say?
> >
> > i felt guilty since i was annoying haunted to answer my questions so i made another statement.
> > but as i read his last post i see he simply does not want to understand what i write.
> > im done now mister plunderfull.
>
> Please call me plundy LOL and you are correct haunted is a tough nut to crack,hang in there though you might find that you like him despite his opposing veiw and ability to post until you fall asleep at your computer.
i’m not a nut though, i’m a stubborn -Yoink-.
i have yet to see an actual strong argument that explains how armour lock reduces the skill gap.
at the moment every arguemnt has been down how the player chooses to react to the person using armour lock.