> So it’s the player with the rockets fault that he didn’t know the other player had AL, right.
oh, you obviously are just skimming through what i wrote and just not taking in what was put forward.
also, didn’t i say this?
> though, i agree that this feature of armour lock should be removed.
hm…
> > you could actually use teamwork, you might die but it’s more or less a traded kill and gives your team as a whole to take controll.
> >
> > all i really see is a failure to adapt to changing situations.
>
> thats the point. why should there a possibility that the better player still dies if he clearly outplayed/outsmarted the other player?
>
> answer this question without beating around the bush please.
i’m sorry but how do you know the kills wouldn’t have been traded anyway?
i thought good players trade kills to push in and gain an advantage.
> wait, so in the above statement about player 1 vs player 2:
>
> player one lacks situational awareness, so he gets ninja’d
> player one has enough situational awareness to realize he is being ninja’d and counter the ninja with a cocklock melee?
>
> this is a terrible example of amror lock stupidity, a better example is.
>
> Player A1 and A2 (both cocklockers) vs player B1 and B2 (both onyx lords)
>
> Player A1 and A2 attack with assault rifles and armor lock and B1 and B2 counter with concentrated dmr fire on A1, A1 goes one shot and locks, A2 continues spraying, B1 and B2 switch concentrated fire to A2, B2 and A2 go one shot, A2 locks, A1 comes out and mutuals with B2, B1 finishes off A1 when he exits lock.
>
> In the above scenario, 2 huge noobs got a net -1 when they deserved a net -2.
> This is why lock is bad. Lock should stay in social slayer but at least its not in arena, objective, or mlg where it would be detremental.
did anyone even see my post? this is an actual break down of the way -Yoink- lock cuts up gameplay.
> > > you could actually use teamwork, you might die but it’s more or less a traded kill and gives your team as a whole to take controll.
> > >
> > > all i really see is a failure to adapt to changing situations.
> >
> > thats the point. why should there a possibility that the better player still dies if he clearly outplayed/outsmarted the other player?
> >
> > answer this question without beating around the bush please.
>
> i’m sorry but how do you know the kills wouldn’t have been traded anyway?
>
> i thought good players trade kills to push in and gain an advantage.
i know the kills wouldnt have been traded because i wrote “the better player still dies if he clearly outplayed/outsmarted the other player”
this implies that there are no trades
> > > > explain how it decreases the skill gap?
> > > > you say it does but provide no explanation so why should i listen to you?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > but, for the better player to win more battles would mean that armour lock was causing them to loose battles which isn’t true.
> > >
> > > a teammate of the AL comes by and kills you although you were better at aiming and outplayed the AL. so the worse player denied your kill without skill (unless you regard using the left stick in loadout screen and pressing a button as skill; but then i wont argue with you anymore)
> >
> > so, he wasn’t killed because of armour lock, he was killed because he failed to adapt to the changed situation and failed to use teamwork.
> >
> >
> >
> > > you got the rocket by setting up map control and watching the respawn timer. you shoot your rocket at the opponent but he armor locks and deflects your rocket back and you die. same as above
> >
> > this is extremely unlikely but does happen and is an actual cause of armour lock but it is extremely rare, it may happen once in a game causing you to die but overall your team took controll and adapted to the changed situation causing a win.
> >
> > or if your team lost then it’s your teams fault for failure to adapt to the changed situation which is the other team now has rockets.
> >
> > though, i agree that this feature of armour lock should be removed.
> >
> >
> >
> > > you fight a swordwielder (implying youre not using AL) and kill him. you pick up the sword and lunge at your next opponent. he armor locks and and denies you another kill
> >
> > swing again using the mele button, he’ll get a sword block on you but you will kill him.
> > jump backwards to dodge the EMP and lunge again.
> > this again is a failure to adapt to a new situation.
> >
> >
> >
> > > what i dont understand with you people is that you do not want to see the contradiction in using invincibility in a game that is about kills
> > >
> > >
> > > the point is that losing battles bc of AL happens to better players. read examples above
> >
> > what i don’t understand is why the “good” players are so narrow minded.
> >
> > also, the examples above are mostly due to players incompetence and not the armour ability.
>
> its awesome that you defend your precious AA 
>
> you wanted me to give examples why armor lock decreases the skill gap. i gave them to you and i will point it out in a more abstract way.
>
> Non-AL players put effort into gaining an advantage (strategy, power weapons, map control).
> AL players put no effort into gaining an advantage.
>
> this can be summarized as a decreased skill gap for the armor lock user.
>
> there you go
it’s awsome that you refuse to debate what i put forward.
if a players wasn’t using an effort to get an advantage while using armour lock then they wouldn’t be getting an advantage but instead be putting themselfs at a diss-advantage.
> > wait, so in the above statement about player 1 vs player 2:
> >
> > player one lacks situational awareness, so he gets ninja’d
> > player one has enough situational awareness to realize he is being ninja’d and counter the ninja with a cocklock melee?
> >
> > this is a terrible example of amror lock stupidity, a better example is.
> >
> > Player A1 and A2 (both cocklockers) vs player B1 and B2 (both onyx lords)
> >
> > Player A1 and A2 attack with assault rifles and armor lock and B1 and B2 counter with concentrated dmr fire on A1, A1 goes one shot and locks, A2 continues spraying, B1 and B2 switch concentrated fire to A2, B2 and A2 go one shot, A2 locks, A1 comes out and mutuals with B2, B1 finishes off A1 when he exits lock.
> >
> > In the above scenario, 2 huge noobs got a net -1 when they deserved a net -2.
> > This is why lock is bad. Lock should stay in social slayer but at least its not in arena, objective, or mlg where it would be detremental.
>
> did anyone even see my post? this is an actual break down of the way -Yoink!- lock cuts up gameplay.
Not to mention b1 and b2 don’t deserve any punishment.
> @A haunted Army
> How do YOU define skill in Halo?
the ability to:
> > I hate AL mostly because a large group of the people who use it, use it as a crutch for their crappy playing style. It severely slows the game down, and they usually just get killed anyway.
> >
> > Then there are the jack*sses, like the ones I ran into last night.
> >
> > I was playing Team Slayer with a friend when another player and his guest we picked up in matchmaking dropped out because they did not like the map.
> >
> > So here it is 4 vs. 2 on a small map, and at least two of these little girls decided to use AL as well as every other power weapon on the map against my friend and I. My friend and I still did fairly well against them, but in my book their play was very unsportsmanlike!
> >
> > When the roles are reversed, my friends and I may pick up the power weapons, but we generally do not use them against the outnumbered team. Seems only fair to me to give them a chance to compete. I would rather have them play the game out than quit. Do not get me started on the clowns that think it is funny to hide. Go play custom games with your other clown friends!
> >
> > I do not mind the Jet pack anywhere near as much as I dislike AL. On certain maps it can be annoying especially if they have the grenade launcher, but if you are decent with the DMR or sniper, then generally Jet packers are easy kills. None of the other abilities tip game play near as much as AL in my opinion.
> >
> > Those players who are good with it, or use it to become bait for their team will probably still use it. Hopefully the crappy players that use it will stop, but if they do not then they will not slow the game down as much.
> >
> > So if you are using it all the time to save your bacon because you cannot shoot worth a crap, then maybe you ought to reevaluate your playing style!
>
> Could you link the game you are refering to?
Here’s the game.
http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Reach/GameStats.aspx?gameid=841274201&player=F111F 19740186
I stand corrected, our teammates didn’t quit, they were just standing round and not playing. I was thinking of another game.
Also, three of the four on the other team used AL against us. Take away the 22 kills they got against our 2 non-existent teammates and we win 30 to 27.
Take away AL and they probably lose by even more. Every time I turned around one of them was in AL. The high scoring guy was using invisibility.
> > @A haunted Army
> > How do YOU define skill in Halo?
>
> the ability to:
> - aim
> - react in a controlled manner instead of panicking
> - be able to adapt and adjust consistently to chaning situations
> - understand and use teamwork
> - find and abuse anything to gain an advantage
So wouldn’t K/D be a reflection of that?
> > > > > explain how it decreases the skill gap?
> > > > > you say it does but provide no explanation so why should i listen to you?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > but, for the better player to win more battles would mean that armour lock was causing them to loose battles which isn’t true.
> > > >
> > > > a teammate of the AL comes by and kills you although you were better at aiming and outplayed the AL. so the worse player denied your kill without skill (unless you regard using the left stick in loadout screen and pressing a button as skill; but then i wont argue with you anymore)
> > >
> > > so, he wasn’t killed because of armour lock, he was killed because he failed to adapt to the changed situation and failed to use teamwork.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > you got the rocket by setting up map control and watching the respawn timer. you shoot your rocket at the opponent but he armor locks and deflects your rocket back and you die. same as above
> > >
> > > this is extremely unlikely but does happen and is an actual cause of armour lock but it is extremely rare, it may happen once in a game causing you to die but overall your team took controll and adapted to the changed situation causing a win.
> > >
> > > or if your team lost then it’s your teams fault for failure to adapt to the changed situation which is the other team now has rockets.
> > >
> > > though, i agree that this feature of armour lock should be removed.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > you fight a swordwielder (implying youre not using AL) and kill him. you pick up the sword and lunge at your next opponent. he armor locks and and denies you another kill
> > >
> > > swing again using the mele button, he’ll get a sword block on you but you will kill him.
> > > jump backwards to dodge the EMP and lunge again.
> > > this again is a failure to adapt to a new situation.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > what i dont understand with you people is that you do not want to see the contradiction in using invincibility in a game that is about kills
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > the point is that losing battles bc of AL happens to better players. read examples above
> > >
> > > what i don’t understand is why the “good” players are so narrow minded.
> > >
> > > also, the examples above are mostly due to players incompetence and not the armour ability.
> >
> > its awesome that you defend your precious AA
> >
> > you wanted me to give examples why armor lock decreases the skill gap. i gave them to you and i will point it out in a more abstract way.
> >
> > Non-AL players put effort into gaining an advantage (strategy, power weapons, map control).
> > AL players put no effort into gaining an advantage.
> >
> > this can be summarized as a decreased skill gap for the armor lock user.
> >
> > there you go
>
> it’s awsome that you refuse to debate what i put forward.
>
> if a players wasn’t using an effort to get an advantage while using armour lock then they wouldn’t be getting an advantage but instead be putting themselfs at a diss-advantage.
I dont know where i was refusing a debate? im answering you all the time
okay so you dont see it as an advantage that armor lock counters every amount of damage?
> > wait, so in the above statement about player 1 vs player 2:
> >
> > player one lacks situational awareness, so he gets ninja’d
> > player one has enough situational awareness to realize he is being ninja’d and counter the ninja with a cocklock melee?
> >
> > this is a terrible example of amror lock stupidity, a better example is.
> >
> > Player A1 and A2 (both cocklockers) vs player B1 and B2 (both onyx lords)
> >
> > Player A1 and A2 attack with assault rifles and armor lock and B1 and B2 counter with concentrated dmr fire on A1, A1 goes one shot and locks, A2 continues spraying, B1 and B2 switch concentrated fire to A2, B2 and A2 go one shot, A2 locks, A1 comes out and mutuals with B2, B1 finishes off A1 when he exits lock.
> >
> > In the above scenario, 2 huge noobs got a net -1 when they deserved a net -2.
> > This is why lock is bad. Lock should stay in social slayer but at least its not in arena, objective, or mlg where it would be detremental.
>
> did anyone even see my post? this is an actual break down of the way -Yoink!- lock cuts up gameplay.
sorry, was going to get to this after i was done replying to the other guys.
the issue here is frosting and as i’ve said in previous posts:
frosting and sticky shedding/deflecting rockets are the only bad things about armour lock, the rest is just failure to adapt and adjust to changing situations.
> > > > > > explain how it decreases the skill gap?
> > > > > > you say it does but provide no explanation so why should i listen to you?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but, for the better player to win more battles would mean that armour lock was causing them to loose battles which isn’t true.
> > > > >
> > > > > a teammate of the AL comes by and kills you although you were better at aiming and outplayed the AL. so the worse player denied your kill without skill (unless you regard using the left stick in loadout screen and pressing a button as skill; but then i wont argue with you anymore)
> > > >
> > > > so, he wasn’t killed because of armour lock, he was killed because he failed to adapt to the changed situation and failed to use teamwork.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > you got the rocket by setting up map control and watching the respawn timer. you shoot your rocket at the opponent but he armor locks and deflects your rocket back and you die. same as above
> > > >
> > > > this is extremely unlikely but does happen and is an actual cause of armour lock but it is extremely rare, it may happen once in a game causing you to die but overall your team took controll and adapted to the changed situation causing a win.
> > > >
> > > > or if your team lost then it’s your teams fault for failure to adapt to the changed situation which is the other team now has rockets.
> > > >
> > > > though, i agree that this feature of armour lock should be removed.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > you fight a swordwielder (implying youre not using AL) and kill him. you pick up the sword and lunge at your next opponent. he armor locks and and denies you another kill
> > > >
> > > > swing again using the mele button, he’ll get a sword block on you but you will kill him.
> > > > jump backwards to dodge the EMP and lunge again.
> > > > this again is a failure to adapt to a new situation.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > what i dont understand with you people is that you do not want to see the contradiction in using invincibility in a game that is about kills
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > the point is that losing battles bc of AL happens to better players. read examples above
> > > >
> > > > what i don’t understand is why the “good” players are so narrow minded.
> > > >
> > > > also, the examples above are mostly due to players incompetence and not the armour ability.
> > >
> > > its awesome that you defend your precious AA
> > >
> > > you wanted me to give examples why armor lock decreases the skill gap. i gave them to you and i will point it out in a more abstract way.
> > >
> > > Non-AL players put effort into gaining an advantage (strategy, power weapons, map control).
> > > AL players put no effort into gaining an advantage.
> > >
> > > this can be summarized as a decreased skill gap for the armor lock user.
> > >
> > > there you go
> >
> > it’s awsome that you refuse to debate what i put forward.
> >
> > if a players wasn’t using an effort to get an advantage while using armour lock then they wouldn’t be getting an advantage but instead be putting themselfs at a diss-advantage.
>
> I dont know where i was refusing a debate? im answering you all the time
>
> okay so you dont see it as an advantage that armor lock counters every amount of damage?
ok then, where were you replying to my points that it’s the players fault and not the armour ability?
it’s only countering damage that you choose to deal to him while he is in armour lock, if he armour locks to block in-comming damage then you stop trying to deal damage when you know it isn’t going to work.
> > > > you could actually use teamwork, you might die but it’s more or less a traded kill and gives your team as a whole to take controll.
> > > >
> > > > all i really see is a failure to adapt to changing situations.
> > >
> > > thats the point. why should there a possibility that the better player still dies if he clearly outplayed/outsmarted the other player?
> > >
> > > answer this question without beating around the bush please.
> >
> > i’m sorry but how do you know the kills wouldn’t have been traded anyway?
> >
> > i thought good players trade kills to push in and gain an advantage.
>
> i know the kills wouldnt have been traded because i wrote “the better player still dies if he clearly outplayed/outsmarted the other player”
>
> this implies that there are no trades
just posting it again in case you overread it.
i really would like an answer to this
> > > @A haunted Army
> > > How do YOU define skill in Halo?
> >
> > the ability to:
> > - aim
> > - react in a controlled manner instead of panicking
> > - be able to adapt and adjust consistently to chaning situations
> > - understand and use teamwork
> > - find and abuse anything to gain an advantage
>
> So wouldn’t K/D be a reflection of that?
er nope.
if they where matched against people with roughly the same skill level then there k/d will be lower.
though, the higher your skill level is the less people you will be matched against with roughly the same skill level as you resulting in a higher k/d.
but lets not forget that k/d is boosted.
also, MLG doesn’t have a higher skill gap, it’s actually the opposite since the average skill level in that playlist is alot higher.
> > > > > you could actually use teamwork, you might die but it’s more or less a traded kill and gives your team as a whole to take controll.
> > > > >
> > > > > all i really see is a failure to adapt to changing situations.
> > > >
> > > > thats the point. why should there a possibility that the better player still dies if he clearly outplayed/outsmarted the other player?
> > > >
> > > > answer this question without beating around the bush please.
> > >
> > > i’m sorry but how do you know the kills wouldn’t have been traded anyway?
> > >
> > > i thought good players trade kills to push in and gain an advantage.
> >
> > i know the kills wouldnt have been traded because i wrote “the better player still dies if he clearly outplayed/outsmarted the other player”
> >
> > this implies that there are no trades
>
> just posting it again in case you overread it.
>
> i really would like an answer to this
how do you know he was outplayed and outsmarted?
> > > > @A haunted Army
> > > > How do YOU define skill in Halo?
> > >
> > > the ability to:
> > > - aim
> > > - react in a controlled manner instead of panicking
> > > - be able to adapt and adjust consistently to chaning situations
> > > - understand and use teamwork
> > > - find and abuse anything to gain an advantage
> >
> > So wouldn’t K/D be a reflection of that?
>
> er nope.
>
> if they where matched against people with roughly the same skill level then there k/d will be lower.
>
> though, the higher your skill level is the less people you will be matched against with roughly the same skill level as you resulting in a higher k/d.
>
> but lets not forget that k/d is boosted.
>
>
> also, MLG doesn’t have a higher skill gap, it’s actually the opposite since the average skill level in that playlist is alot higher.
Why not? I’m abusing the less skilled players!
> > > > > @A haunted Army
> > > > > How do YOU define skill in Halo?
> > > >
> > > > the ability to:
> > > > - aim
> > > > - react in a controlled manner instead of panicking
> > > > - be able to adapt and adjust consistently to chaning situations
> > > > - understand and use teamwork
> > > > - find and abuse anything to gain an advantage
> > >
> > > So wouldn’t K/D be a reflection of that?
> >
> > er nope.
> >
> > if they where matched against people with roughly the same skill level then there k/d will be lower.
> >
> > though, the higher your skill level is the less people you will be matched against with roughly the same skill level as you resulting in a higher k/d.
> >
> > but lets not forget that k/d is boosted.
> >
> >
> > also, MLG doesn’t have a higher skill gap, it’s actually the opposite since the average skill level in that playlist is alot higher.
>
> Why not? I’m abusing the less skilled players!
and how do i know it wasn’t arranged just so you can get the higher k/d?
> > > > > > > explain how it decreases the skill gap?
> > > > > > > you say it does but provide no explanation so why should i listen to you?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > but, for the better player to win more battles would mean that armour lock was causing them to loose battles which isn’t true.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > a teammate of the AL comes by and kills you although you were better at aiming and outplayed the AL. so the worse player denied your kill without skill (unless you regard using the left stick in loadout screen and pressing a button as skill; but then i wont argue with you anymore)
> > > > >
> > > > > so, he wasn’t killed because of armour lock, he was killed because he failed to adapt to the changed situation and failed to use teamwork.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > you got the rocket by setting up map control and watching the respawn timer. you shoot your rocket at the opponent but he armor locks and deflects your rocket back and you die. same as above
> > > > >
> > > > > this is extremely unlikely but does happen and is an actual cause of armour lock but it is extremely rare, it may happen once in a game causing you to die but overall your team took controll and adapted to the changed situation causing a win.
> > > > >
> > > > > or if your team lost then it’s your teams fault for failure to adapt to the changed situation which is the other team now has rockets.
> > > > >
> > > > > though, i agree that this feature of armour lock should be removed.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > you fight a swordwielder (implying youre not using AL) and kill him. you pick up the sword and lunge at your next opponent. he armor locks and and denies you another kill
> > > > >
> > > > > swing again using the mele button, he’ll get a sword block on you but you will kill him.
> > > > > jump backwards to dodge the EMP and lunge again.
> > > > > this again is a failure to adapt to a new situation.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > what i dont understand with you people is that you do not want to see the contradiction in using invincibility in a game that is about kills
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > the point is that losing battles bc of AL happens to better players. read examples above
> > > > >
> > > > > what i don’t understand is why the “good” players are so narrow minded.
> > > > >
> > > > > also, the examples above are mostly due to players incompetence and not the armour ability.
> > > >
> > > > its awesome that you defend your precious AA
> > > >
> > > > you wanted me to give examples why armor lock decreases the skill gap. i gave them to you and i will point it out in a more abstract way.
> > > >
> > > > Non-AL players put effort into gaining an advantage (strategy, power weapons, map control).
> > > > AL players put no effort into gaining an advantage.
> > > >
> > > > this can be summarized as a decreased skill gap for the armor lock user.
> > > >
> > > > there you go
> > >
> > > it’s awsome that you refuse to debate what i put forward.
> > >
> > > if a players wasn’t using an effort to get an advantage while using armour lock then they wouldn’t be getting an advantage but instead be putting themselfs at a diss-advantage.
> >
> > I dont know where i was refusing a debate? im answering you all the time
> >
> > okay so you dont see it as an advantage that armor lock counters every amount of damage?
>
> ok then, where were you replying to my points that it’s the players fault and not the armour ability?
>
> it’s only countering damage that you choose to deal to him while he is in armour lock, if he armour locks to block in-comming damage then you stop trying to deal damage when you know it isn’t going to work.
i do not want to know what to do.
i want to know if you see the ability of armor lock to counter every amount of damage as ana advantage or not.
> > > > > > @A haunted Army
> > > > > > How do YOU define skill in Halo?
> > > > >
> > > > > the ability to:
> > > > > - aim
> > > > > - react in a controlled manner instead of panicking
> > > > > - be able to adapt and adjust consistently to chaning situations
> > > > > - understand and use teamwork
> > > > > - find and abuse anything to gain an advantage
> > > >
> > > > So wouldn’t K/D be a reflection of that?
> > >
> > > er nope.
> > >
> > > if they where matched against people with roughly the same skill level then there k/d will be lower.
> > >
> > > though, the higher your skill level is the less people you will be matched against with roughly the same skill level as you resulting in a higher k/d.
> > >
> > > but lets not forget that k/d is boosted.
> > >
> > >
> > > also, MLG doesn’t have a higher skill gap, it’s actually the opposite since the average skill level in that playlist is alot higher.
> >
> > Why not? I’m abusing the less skilled players!
>
> and how do i know it wasn’t arranged just so you can get the higher k/d?
…How about taking a quick peek at my game history?
> > > > > > > > explain how it decreases the skill gap?
> > > > > > > > you say it does but provide no explanation so why should i listen to you?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > but, for the better player to win more battles would mean that armour lock was causing them to loose battles which isn’t true.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > a teammate of the AL comes by and kills you although you were better at aiming and outplayed the AL. so the worse player denied your kill without skill (unless you regard using the left stick in loadout screen and pressing a button as skill; but then i wont argue with you anymore)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > so, he wasn’t killed because of armour lock, he was killed because he failed to adapt to the changed situation and failed to use teamwork.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > you got the rocket by setting up map control and watching the respawn timer. you shoot your rocket at the opponent but he armor locks and deflects your rocket back and you die. same as above
> > > > > >
> > > > > > this is extremely unlikely but does happen and is an actual cause of armour lock but it is extremely rare, it may happen once in a game causing you to die but overall your team took controll and adapted to the changed situation causing a win.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > or if your team lost then it’s your teams fault for failure to adapt to the changed situation which is the other team now has rockets.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > though, i agree that this feature of armour lock should be removed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > you fight a swordwielder (implying youre not using AL) and kill him. you pick up the sword and lunge at your next opponent. he armor locks and and denies you another kill
> > > > > >
> > > > > > swing again using the mele button, he’ll get a sword block on you but you will kill him.
> > > > > > jump backwards to dodge the EMP and lunge again.
> > > > > > this again is a failure to adapt to a new situation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > what i dont understand with you people is that you do not want to see the contradiction in using invincibility in a game that is about kills
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > the point is that losing battles bc of AL happens to better players. read examples above
> > > > > >
> > > > > > what i don’t understand is why the “good” players are so narrow minded.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > also, the examples above are mostly due to players incompetence and not the armour ability.
> > > > >
> > > > > its awesome that you defend your precious AA
> > > > >
> > > > > you wanted me to give examples why armor lock decreases the skill gap. i gave them to you and i will point it out in a more abstract way.
> > > > >
> > > > > Non-AL players put effort into gaining an advantage (strategy, power weapons, map control).
> > > > > AL players put no effort into gaining an advantage.
> > > > >
> > > > > this can be summarized as a decreased skill gap for the armor lock user.
> > > > >
> > > > > there you go
> > > >
> > > > it’s awsome that you refuse to debate what i put forward.
> > > >
> > > > if a players wasn’t using an effort to get an advantage while using armour lock then they wouldn’t be getting an advantage but instead be putting themselfs at a diss-advantage.
> > >
> > > I dont know where i was refusing a debate? im answering you all the time
> > >
> > > okay so you dont see it as an advantage that armor lock counters every amount of damage?
> >
> > ok then, where were you replying to my points that it’s the players fault and not the armour ability?
> >
> > it’s only countering damage that you choose to deal to him while he is in armour lock, if he armour locks to block in-comming damage then you stop trying to deal damage when you know it isn’t going to work.
>
> i do not want to know what to do.
> i want to know if you see the ability of armor lock to counter every amount of damage as ana advantage or not.
it’s not an advantage if you cannot move.
it’s how you use it that gives the advantage and that’s down to the player and not the armour ability.